IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v233y2019i2p268-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of respondent type on relationships between safety climate and safety performance in manufacturing firm

Author

Listed:
  • Vedant Singh
  • Anita Verma

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the interrelation between the dimensions of safety climate and of safety performance in the Indian manufacturing industries. A cross-sectional survey was carried out using a sample of 242 manufacturing employees from five small- and medium-scale industries across north India. An organized questionnaire was developed to acquire participant’s demographic attributes and safety climate and safety performance factors. In accordance with the literature review, a model is hypothesized to demonstrate the interrelations between safety climate and safety performance. It was examined and validated by applying confirmatory factor analysis on calibration and validation sub-samples, respectively. In addition, to analyze the moderating effects of respondent type, structural equation modeling was used. This study resulted that the impact of safety performance on safety participation and safety compliance was significantly positive whereas the impact on the number of self-reported accidents/injuries and near misses was significantly negative. The study assists the frame of understanding by uncovering the divergence in subsisting constructs of safety climate and safety performance. An accurate model is presumed to briefly determine the safety climate and safety performance in the Indian manufacturing industries; while concluding the results of the study to other developing countries, prudence must be applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Vedant Singh & Anita Verma, 2019. "Influence of respondent type on relationships between safety climate and safety performance in manufacturing firm," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 268-284, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:2:p:268-284
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X18780773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X18780773
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X18780773?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathryn Mearns & Sean M. Whitaker & Rhona Flin, 2001. "Benchmarking Safety Climate in Hazardous Environments: A Longitudinal, Interorganizational Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 771-786, August.
    2. Lu, Chin-Shan & Lai, Kee-hung & Cheng, T.C.E., 2007. "Application of structural equation modeling to evaluate the intention of shippers to use Internet services in liner shipping," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(2), pages 845-867, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simone CASCHILI & Francesca MEDDA, 2015. "The Port Attractiveness Index:Application On African Ports," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 41, pages 47-82.
    2. Abdulaziz Alghadeer & Sherif Mohamed, 2016. "Diffusion of Organisational Innovation in Saudi Arabia: The Case of the Project Management Office (PMO)," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(04), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Yanfeng Liu & Shanshan Zhao & Shuxian Zhao, 2025. "Adoption of digital logistics platforms in the maritime logistics industry: based on diffusion of innovations and extended technology acceptance," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Chao, Shih-Liang & Lin, Pei-Shan, 2009. "Critical factors affecting the adoption of container security service: The shippers' perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 67-77, November.
    5. Veasna, Sou & Wu, Wann-Yih & Huang, Chu-Hsin, 2013. "The impact of destination source credibility on destination satisfaction: The mediating effects of destination attachment and destination image," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 511-526.
    6. Vytautas Dikcius & Eleonora Seimiene & Ramunas Casas, 2018. "Brand Personality Scale: Is It Applicable For A Small Emerging Country?," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 9(2).
    7. Bastič Majda & Mulej Matjaž & Zore Mira, 2020. "CSR and Financial Performance – Linked by Innovative Activities," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 66(2), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Pani, Agnivesh & Sahu, Prasanta K., 2022. "Modelling non-response in establishment-based freight surveys: A sampling tool for statewide freight data collection in middle-income countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 128-138.
    9. Lu, Chin-Shan & Weng, Hsiang-Kai & Huang, Fei & Leung, Lai-Han & Wang, Wen-Di, 2018. "Assessing the seafaring intention of maritime students in Hong Kong," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 258-273.
    10. Deng, Ping & Lu, Shiqing & Xiao, Hanbin, 2013. "Evaluation of the relevance measure between ports and regional economy using structural equation modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 123-133.
    11. Meghan P. Leaver & Tom W. Reader, 2019. "Safety Culture in Financial Trading: An Analysis of Trading Misconduct Investigations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 461-481, January.
    12. Vedant Singh, 2016. "Perceptions of emission reduction potential in air transport: a structural equation modeling approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 377-403, December.
    13. Zore Mira & Bastič Majda & Mulej Matjaž, 2016. "Seven or Fewer Core Contents of Social Responsibility?," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 62(3), pages 29-38, September.
    14. Balci, Gökcay, 2021. "Digitalization in container shipping: Do perception and satisfaction regarding digital products in a non-technology industry affect overall customer loyalty?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    15. Alaa Badwelan & Steve Drew & Adel Bahaddad, 2016. "Towards Acceptance M-Learning Approach in Higher Education in Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 1-12, July.
    16. Chealy Chet & Serey Sok & Veasna Sou, 2022. "The Antecedents and Consequences of Study Commitment to Online Learning at Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Cambodia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-43, March.
    17. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Yu Zhang & Anil Kumar & Edmundas Zavadskas & Dalia Streimikiene, 2020. "Measuring the impact of renewable energy, public health expenditure, logistics, and environmental performance on sustainable economic growth," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 833-843, July.
    18. Shang-Yu Chen & Chung-Cheng Lu, 2016. "A Model of Green Acceptance and Intentions to Use Bike-Sharing: YouBike Users in Taiwan," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1103-1124, December.
    19. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    20. Ziaul Haque Munim & Hans-Joachim Schramm, 2018. "The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:2:p:268-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.