IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v231y2017i5p481-494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A health condition model for wind turbine monitoring through neural networks and proportional hazard models

Author

Listed:
  • Peyman Mazidi
  • Mian Du
  • Lina Bertling Tjernberg
  • Miguel A Sanz Bobi

Abstract

In this article, a parametric model for health condition monitoring of wind turbines is developed. The study is based on the assumption that a wind turbine’s health condition can be modeled through three features: rotor speed, gearbox temperature and generator winding temperature. At first, three neural network models are created to simulate normal behavior of each feature. Deviation signals are then defined and calculated as accumulated time-series of differences between neural network predictions and actual measurements. These cumulative signals carry health condition–related information. Next, through nonlinear regression technique, the signals are used to produce individual models for considered features, which mathematically have the form of proportional hazard models. Finally, they are combined to construct an overall parametric health condition model which partially represents health condition of the wind turbine. In addition, a dynamic threshold for the model is developed to facilitate and add more insight in performance monitoring aspect. The health condition monitoring of wind turbine model has capability of evaluating real-time and overall health condition of a wind turbine which can also be used with regard to maintenance in electricity generation in electric power systems. The model also has flexibility to overcome current challenges such as scalability and adaptability. The model is verified in illustrating changes in real-time and overall health condition with respect to considered anomalies by testing through actual and artificial data.

Suggested Citation

  • Peyman Mazidi & Mian Du & Lina Bertling Tjernberg & Miguel A Sanz Bobi, 2017. "A health condition model for wind turbine monitoring through neural networks and proportional hazard models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(5), pages 481-494, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:231:y:2017:i:5:p:481-494
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X17707902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X17707902
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X17707902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre Tchakoua & René Wamkeue & Mohand Ouhrouche & Fouad Slaoui-Hasnaoui & Tommy Andy Tameghe & Gabriel Ekemb, 2014. "Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring: State-of-the-Art Review, New Trends, and Future Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-36, April.
    2. Sun, Peng & Li, Jian & Wang, Caisheng & Lei, Xiao, 2016. "A generalized model for wind turbine anomaly identification based on SCADA data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 550-567.
    3. Kusiak, Andrew & Zheng, Haiyang & Song, Zhe, 2009. "On-line monitoring of power curves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1487-1493.
    4. Tian, Zhigang & Liao, Haitao, 2011. "Condition based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems using proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 581-589.
    5. de Azevedo, Henrique Dias Machado & Araújo, Alex Maurício & Bouchonneau, Nadège, 2016. "A review of wind turbine bearing condition monitoring: State of the art and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 368-379.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pliego Marugán, Alberto & Peco Chacón, Ana María & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro, 2019. "Reliability analysis of detecting false alarms that employ neural networks: A real case study on wind turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Izquierdo, J. & Crespo Márquez, A. & Uribetxebarria, J., 2019. "Dynamic artificial neural network-based reliability considering operational context of assets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 483-493.
    3. Xia, Tangbin & Dong, Yifan & Xiao, Lei & Du, Shichang & Pan, Ershun & Xi, Lifeng, 2018. "Recent advances in prognostics and health management for advanced manufacturing paradigms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 255-268.
    4. Moghaddass, Ramin & Sheng, Shuangwen, 2019. "An anomaly detection framework for dynamic systems using a Bayesian hierarchical framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 561-582.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stetco, Adrian & Dinmohammadi, Fateme & Zhao, Xingyu & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Barnes, Mike & Keane, John & Nenadic, Goran, 2019. "Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 620-635.
    2. Jijian Lian & Ou Cai & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Yue Zhao, 2019. "Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Yang, Wenguang & Liu, Chao & Jiang, Dongxiang, 2018. "An unsupervised spatiotemporal graphical modeling approach for wind turbine condition monitoring," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 230-241.
    4. Hsu-Hao Yang & Mei-Ling Huang & Shih-Wei Yang, 2015. "Integrating Auto-Associative Neural Networks with Hotelling T 2 Control Charts for Wind Turbine Fault Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Francesc Pozo & Yolanda Vidal & Óscar Salgado, 2018. "Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring Strategy through Multiway PCA and Multivariate Inference," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Ren, Zhengru & Verma, Amrit Shankar & Li, Ye & Teuwen, Julie J.E. & Jiang, Zhiyu, 2021. "Offshore wind turbine operations and maintenance: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Qu, Fuming & Liu, Jinhai & Zhu, Hongfei & Zhou, Bowen, 2020. "Wind turbine fault detection based on expanded linguistic terms and rules using non-singleton fuzzy logic," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    8. Bangalore, P. & Patriksson, M., 2018. "Analysis of SCADA data for early fault detection, with application to the maintenance management of wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 521-532.
    9. Pliego Marugán, Alberto & Peco Chacón, Ana María & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro, 2019. "Reliability analysis of detecting false alarms that employ neural networks: A real case study on wind turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Cheng Xiao & Zuojun Liu & Tieling Zhang & Lei Zhang, 2019. "On Fault Prediction for Wind Turbine Pitch System Using Radar Chart and Support Vector Machine Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Yang, Hsu-Hao & Huang, Mei-Ling & Lai, Chun-Mei & Jin, Jhih-Rong, 2018. "An approach combining data mining and control charts-based model for fault detection in wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 808-816.
    12. Md Liton Hossain & Ahmed Abu-Siada & S. M. Muyeen, 2018. "Methods for Advanced Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring and Early Diagnosis: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    13. Leite, Gustavo de Novaes Pires & Araújo, Alex Maurício & Rosas, Pedro André Carvalho, 2018. "Prognostic techniques applied to maintenance of wind turbines: a concise and specific review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1917-1925.
    14. Ruiz de la Hermosa González-Carrato, Raúl, 2018. "Wind farm monitoring using Mahalanobis distance and fuzzy clustering," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 526-540.
    15. Asadzadeh, S.M. & Azadeh, A., 2014. "An integrated systemic model for optimization of condition-based maintenance with human error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 117-131.
    16. Chen, Xuejun & Yang, Yongming & Cui, Zhixin & Shen, Jun, 2019. "Vibration fault diagnosis of wind turbines based on variational mode decomposition and energy entropy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1100-1109.
    17. Coria, V.H. & Maximov, S. & Rivas-Dávalos, F. & Melchor, C.L. & Guardado, J.L., 2015. "Analytical method for optimization of maintenance policy based on available system failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 55-63.
    18. Habibi, Hamed & Howard, Ian & Simani, Silvio, 2019. "Reliability improvement of wind turbine power generation using model-based fault detection and fault tolerant control: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 877-896.
    19. Arkaitz Rabanal & Alain Ulazia & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi & Jon Sáenz & Unai Elosegui, 2018. "MIDAS: A Benchmarking Multi-Criteria Method for the Identification of Defective Anemometers in Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Miguel A. Rodríguez-López & Luis M. López-González & Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas, 2018. "Methodology for Detecting Malfunctions and Evaluating the Maintenance Effectiveness in Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Using Generic versus Specific Models from SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:231:y:2017:i:5:p:481-494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.