IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i14p2693-d248209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Fault Prediction for Wind Turbine Pitch System Using Radar Chart and Support Vector Machine Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng Xiao

    (School of Control Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300131, China
    School of Electronic and Control Engineering, North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering, Hebei 065000, China)

  • Zuojun Liu

    (School of Control Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300131, China)

  • Tieling Zhang

    (Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia)

  • Lei Zhang

    (School of Control Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300131, China)

Abstract

In order to reduce operation and maintenance cost and improve fault diagnosis and detection accuracy for wind turbines, a study on advanced methods has been carried out. The purpose of this paper is to present a new method developed using radar chart and support vector machine (SVM) approach for fault diagnosis and prediction of wind turbine pitch system as it usually has a higher failure rate. In the study, the supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system data are utilized as source data for SVM prediction. First of all, the characteristics of the indicator variable data collected by the SCADA system are analyzed, and the radar charts corresponding to the normal and faulty operation of the wind turbine pitch system are constructed using the indicator variable data. Secondly, the SVM method is used to extract the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features and histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) features of the radar charts, and the SVM classifier is trained. Then, the operational status is predicted, the classification effect is evaluated by the confusion matrix, and the prediction evaluation index is calculated. Thirdly, the support vector regression method is used to analyze the SCADA indicator variable data, the input and output of the regression model are determined, and the training prediction model is established, and the prediction accuracy of the test model is analyzed using the test sample data. Finally, the forecasting evaluation indexes obtained by the above two methods are compared. It proves that the proposed method using SVM to analyze the system radar charts has a higher prediction accuracy of 91.24% than the support vector regression method. The prediction accuracy is improved by 8.6%. Hence, it is verified that the new method using a radar chart and SVM approach has superiority over the support vector regression method.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng Xiao & Zuojun Liu & Tieling Zhang & Lei Zhang, 2019. "On Fault Prediction for Wind Turbine Pitch System Using Radar Chart and Support Vector Machine Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:14:p:2693-:d:248209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/14/2693/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/14/2693/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Hsu-Hao & Huang, Mei-Ling & Lai, Chun-Mei & Jin, Jhih-Rong, 2018. "An approach combining data mining and control charts-based model for fault detection in wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 808-816.
    2. Bangalore, P. & Patriksson, M., 2018. "Analysis of SCADA data for early fault detection, with application to the maintenance management of wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 521-532.
    3. Bi, Ran & Zhou, Chengke & Hepburn, Donald M., 2017. "Detection and classification of faults in pitch-regulated wind turbine generators using normal behaviour models based on performance curves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 674-688.
    4. Pierre Tchakoua & René Wamkeue & Mohand Ouhrouche & Fouad Slaoui-Hasnaoui & Tommy Andy Tameghe & Gabriel Ekemb, 2014. "Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring: State-of-the-Art Review, New Trends, and Future Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-36, April.
    5. Ruiz de la Hermosa González-Carrato, Raúl, 2018. "Wind farm monitoring using Mahalanobis distance and fuzzy clustering," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 526-540.
    6. Sun, Peng & Li, Jian & Wang, Caisheng & Lei, Xiao, 2016. "A generalized model for wind turbine anomaly identification based on SCADA data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 550-567.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zuojun Liu & Cheng Xiao & Tieling Zhang & Xu Zhang, 2020. "Research on Fault Detection for Three Types of Wind Turbine Subsystems Using Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo & Ruifeng Cao, 2020. "Towards Developing an Automated Faults Characterisation Framework for Rotating Machines. Part 1: Rotor-Related Faults," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Gisela Pujol-Vazquez & Leonardo Acho & José Gibergans-Báguena, 2020. "Fault Detection Algorithm for Wind Turbines’ Pitch Actuator Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge Maldonado-Correa & Sergio Martín-Martínez & Estefanía Artigao & Emilio Gómez-Lázaro, 2020. "Using SCADA Data for Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Annalisa Santolamazza & Daniele Dadi & Vito Introna, 2021. "A Data-Mining Approach for Wind Turbine Fault Detection Based on SCADA Data Analysis Using Artificial Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Jijian Lian & Ou Cai & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Yue Zhao, 2019. "Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    4. Hong Wang & Hongbin Wang & Guoqian Jiang & Jimeng Li & Yueling Wang, 2019. "Early Fault Detection of Wind Turbines Based on Operational Condition Clustering and Optimized Deep Belief Network Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Peyman Mazidi & Mian Du & Lina Bertling Tjernberg & Miguel A Sanz Bobi, 2017. "A health condition model for wind turbine monitoring through neural networks and proportional hazard models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(5), pages 481-494, October.
    6. Yang, Wenguang & Liu, Chao & Jiang, Dongxiang, 2018. "An unsupervised spatiotemporal graphical modeling approach for wind turbine condition monitoring," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 230-241.
    7. Yuri Merizalde & Luis Hernández-Callejo & Oscar Duque-Perez & Víctor Alonso-Gómez, 2019. "Maintenance Models Applied to Wind Turbines. A Comprehensive Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-41, January.
    8. Xiaoyi Qian & Yuxian Zhang & Mohammed Gendeel, 2019. "State Rules Mining and Probabilistic Fault Analysis for 5 MW Offshore Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Francesc Pozo & Yolanda Vidal & Óscar Salgado, 2018. "Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring Strategy through Multiway PCA and Multivariate Inference," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Gang Li & Weidong Zhu, 2022. "A Review on Up-to-Date Gearbox Technologies and Maintenance of Tidal Current Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Md Liton Hossain & Ahmed Abu-Siada & S. M. Muyeen, 2018. "Methods for Advanced Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring and Early Diagnosis: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Chen, Junsheng & Li, Jian & Chen, Weigen & Wang, Youyuan & Jiang, Tianyan, 2020. "Anomaly detection for wind turbines based on the reconstruction of condition parameters using stacked denoising autoencoders," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1469-1480.
    13. Sales-Setién, Ester & Peñarrocha-Alós, Ignacio, 2020. "Robust estimation and diagnosis of wind turbine pitch misalignments at a wind farm level," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1746-1765.
    14. Chen, Xuejun & Yang, Yongming & Cui, Zhixin & Shen, Jun, 2019. "Vibration fault diagnosis of wind turbines based on variational mode decomposition and energy entropy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1100-1109.
    15. Habibi, Hamed & Howard, Ian & Simani, Silvio, 2019. "Reliability improvement of wind turbine power generation using model-based fault detection and fault tolerant control: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 877-896.
    16. Arkaitz Rabanal & Alain Ulazia & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi & Jon Sáenz & Unai Elosegui, 2018. "MIDAS: A Benchmarking Multi-Criteria Method for the Identification of Defective Anemometers in Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Miguel A. Rodríguez-López & Luis M. López-González & Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas, 2018. "Methodology for Detecting Malfunctions and Evaluating the Maintenance Effectiveness in Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Using Generic versus Specific Models from SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, March.
    18. Przemyslaw Baranski & Piotr Pietrzak, 2016. "Computational Effective Fault Detection by Means of Signature Functions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Fan Zhang & Juchuan Dai & Deshun Liu & Linxing Li & Xin Long, 2019. "Investigation of the Pitch Load of Large-Scale Wind Turbines Using Field SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Sun, Chuan & Chen, Yueyi & Cheng, Cheng, 2021. "Imputation of missing data from offshore wind farms using spatio-temporal correlation and feature correlation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:14:p:2693-:d:248209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.