Non-domination and pure negative liberty
The central insights of Philip Pettitâ€™s republican account of liberty are that (1) freedom consists in the absence of domination and (2) non-domination is not reducible to what is commonly called â€˜negative libertyâ€™. Recently, however, Matthew Kramer and Ian Carter have questioned whether the harms identified by Pettit under the banner of domination are not equally well accounted for by what they call the â€˜pure negativeâ€™ view. In this article, first I argue that Pettitâ€™s response to their criticism is problematic insofar as it produces the following dilemma: either Pettit must concede that domination which one regards as consistent with oneâ€™s own best interests does not limit oneâ€™s freedom or he must embrace the implication that one can be forced to be free, a result he explici tly wants to avoid. Second, I argue that, despite the inadequacy of Pettitâ€™s response, he is ultimately right in thinking that domination and negative liberty are sometimes compatible. My central contention, then, is that neither Pettitâ€™s non-domination view nor Carter and Kramerâ€™s pure negative view are able to account for the loss of liberty one suffers under conditions of domination.
Volume (Year): 11 (2012)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
|Contact details of provider:|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:11:y:2012:i:2:p:186-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.