IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v49y2005i1p90-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discord and Collaboration between Allies

Author

Listed:
  • Akan Malici

    (Department of Political Science, Arizona State University)

Abstract

Why did France and Great Britain cooperate in Operation Enduring Freedom after September 11, 2001, and fail to achieve cooperation in Operation Iraqi Freedom in March 2003? Operational code analysis is used to test the threat-cooperation proposition that common perceptions of a security externality and common prescriptions toward it lead to cooperation, whereas an absence of common perceptions or prescriptions leads to a lack of cooperation. Operational code analysis is well suited for this task because it conceptualizes the “self in situation,†with the self having diagnostic propensities about a security externality and prescriptive propensities toward this situation. An examination of these propensities in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom lends strong support for the threat-cooperation proposition.

Suggested Citation

  • Akan Malici, 2005. "Discord and Collaboration between Allies," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 49(1), pages 90-119, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:49:y:2005:i:1:p:90-119
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002704269356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002704269356
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002704269356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur A. Stein, 1976. "Conflict and Cohesion," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 20(1), pages 143-172, March.
    2. Vasquez, John A., 1997. "The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz's Balancing Proposition," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 91(4), pages 899-912, December.
    3. Wendt, Alexander E., 1987. "The agent-structure problem in international relations theory," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(3), pages 335-370, July.
    4. Wendt, Alexander, 1992. "Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 391-425, April.
    5. Arthur T. Denzau & Douglass C. North, 1994. "Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 3-31, February.
    6. Putnam, Robert D., 1988. "Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 427-460, July.
    7. Lebow, Richard Ned, 1994. "The long peace, the end of the cold war, and the failure of realism," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(2), pages 249-277, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Remi Maier-Rigaud, 2008. "International Organizations as Corporate Actors: Agency and Emergence in Theories of International Relations," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2008_07, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    2. Boryslav Brekhov, 2016. "Demokratischer Wirtschaftsfrieden," Potsdam Economic Papers 05, Universität Potsdam, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    3. Oran Young, 2001. "The Behavioral Effects of Environmental Regimes: Collective-Action vs. Social-Practice Models," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 9-29, January.
    4. Richards, Diana, 1998. "Mutual knowledge structures and social coordination: a knowledge-induced equilibrium," Bulletins 7478, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
    5. Dr. Declan A. Amaraegbu, 2015. "Contextualising the Syrian Crisis against Realism and Security Competition in the 21st Century," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 4(2), pages 795-811, April.
    6. Katzenstein, Peter Joachim, 1990. "Analyzing change in international politics: The new institutionalism and the interpretative approach," MPIfG Discussion Paper 90/10, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    7. Bhumitra Chakma, 2015. "Sheikh Hasina Government’s India Policy: A Three-level Game?," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 2(1), pages 27-51, April.
    8. Mengi-Dinçer, H. & Ediger, V.Ş. & Yesevi, Ç.G., 2021. "Evaluating the International Renewable Energy Agency through the lens of social constructivism," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    9. David L. Rousseau, 2002. "Motivations for Choice," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 46(3), pages 394-426, June.
    10. Lluc López i Vidal, 2022. "Beyond the Gaiatsu Model: Japan’s Asia-Pacific Policy and Neoclassical Realism," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 9(1), pages 26-49, April.
    11. Florent Frasson-Quenoz & Aldo Olano Alor & Erli Margarita Marín-Aranguren & Francisco Daniel Trejos-Mateus & Martha Isabel Gómez Lee & Gisela da Silva Guevara & Martha Ardila & Javier Garay & Pío Garc, 2018. "Teorías sobre las relaciones internacionales. Perspectivas y lecturas desde América latina," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales, number 128, August.
    12. Zürn, Michael, 1994. "We can do much better! Aber muß es auf amerikanisch sein? Zum Vergleich der Disziplin "Internationale Beziehungen" in den USA und in Deutschland," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 1, pages 91-114.
    13. Diana Panke, 2017. "Speech is silver, silence is golden? Examining state activity in international negotiations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 121-146, March.
    14. Tichý, Lukáš & Dubský, Zbyněk, 2020. "Russian energy discourse on the V4 countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    15. Jayati Srivastava & Ananya Sharma, 2014. "International Relations Theory and World Order," South Asian Survey, , vol. 21(1-2), pages 20-34, March.
    16. Brittnee Carter, 2022. "Revisiting the Bandwagoning Hypothesis: A Statistical Analysis of the Alliance Dynamics of Small States," International Studies, , vol. 59(1), pages 7-27, January.
    17. Marc V. Simon & Harvey Starr, 1996. "Extraction, Allocation, and the Rise and Decline of States," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(2), pages 272-297, June.
    18. Robert Pahre & Paul A. Papayoanou, 1997. "Using Game Theory to Link Domestic and International Politics," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(1), pages 4-11, February.
    19. Diana Panke & Gurur Polat & Franziska Hohlstein, 2021. "Satisfied or not? Exploring the interplay of individual, country and international organization characteristics for negotiation success," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 403-429, April.
    20. Jeremy Garlick, 2016. "Not So Simple," China Report, , vol. 52(4), pages 284-305, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:49:y:2005:i:1:p:90-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.