IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intstu/v58y2021i3p363-379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BRICS and Global Governance: Will the Grouping be able to Reform the United Nations Security Council?

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Petrone

Abstract

This article analyses the role played by the Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) countries within the context of the reform of international institutions, in primis the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). In recent years, the new emerging powers, among which the BRICS occupy a central position, have instigated a paradigm shift in international relations and global governance (GG). Furthermore, some scholars argue that the BRICS could inaugurate a new world order. Since the United Nations (UN) is one of the institutions in which these changes need to be more broadly reflected due to its global projection, it is doubtful if the BRICS will be able to bring about its reform. In fact, several debates were conducted about the need to reform the UN and, in particular, the Security Council (SC). In order to do this, the article examines the interests of the BRICS countries, within the group itself, and their vision for the UNSC. Only a common vision within the group could have specific effects in reforming the UNSC, thus giving a new shape to GG, which may not be possible. There are several obstacles from within the BRICS itself in this regard, despite the fact that during their summits, they have repeatedly called for the UN reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Petrone, 2021. "BRICS and Global Governance: Will the Grouping be able to Reform the United Nations Security Council?," International Studies, , vol. 58(3), pages 363-379, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:58:y:2021:i:3:p:363-379
    DOI: 10.1177/00208817211029409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00208817211029409
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00208817211029409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madeleine O. Hosli & Thomas Dörfler, 2019. "Why is change so slow? Assessing prospects for United Nations Security Council reform," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 35-50, January.
    2. Deepak Nayyar, 2016. "BRICS, developing countries and global governance," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 575-591, April.
    3. Madeleine O. Hosli & Thomas Dörfler, 2019. "Why is change so slow? Assessing prospects for United Nations Security Council reform," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 35-50, January.
    4. Ramesh Thakur, 2014. "How representative are ?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 1791-1808, November.
    5. Stephen Browne, 2014. "A changing world: is the UN development system ready?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 1845-1859, November.
    6. Thomas G. Weiss & Adriana Erthal Abdenur, 2014. "Introduction: emerging powers and the UN – what kind of development partnership?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 1749-1758, November.
    7. Christian Downie & Marc Williams, 2018. "After the Paris Agreement: What Role for the BRICS in Global Climate Governance?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(3), pages 398-407, September.
    8. Mark Weisbrot & Jake Johnston, 2016. "Voting Share Reform at the IMF: Will it Make a Difference?," CEPR Reports and Issue Briefs 2016-09, Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Petrone, 2020. "What If Soft Power Becomes the New Weapon for World Leadership? Considerations on the Debate in Relation to the New World Order," Proceedings of the 17th International RAIS Conference, June 1-2, 2020 020fp, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    2. Haug, Sebastian, 2021. "Mainstreaming South-South and triangular cooperation: Work in progress at the United Nations," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    3. Wen Pan & Madeleine O. Hosli & Michaël Lantmeeters, 2023. "Historical institutionalism and policy coordination: origins of the European semester," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 141-167, April.
    4. Carolijn van Noort, 2017. "Study of Strategic Narratives: The Case of BRICS," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 121-129.
    5. Bas Hooijmaaijers, 2021. "The BRICS Countries’ Bilateral Economic Relations, 2009 to 2019: Between Rhetoric and Reality," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    6. Tana Johnson & Johannes Urpelainen, 2020. "The more things change, the more they stay the same: Developing countries’ unity at the nexus of trade and environmental policy," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 445-473, April.
    7. Xiaoguang Wang, 2020. "Leadership-building dilemmas in emerging powers’ economic diplomacy: Russia’s energy diplomacy and China’s OBOR," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 117-138, March.
    8. Yitong Chen & Huirong Liu, 2023. "Critical Perspectives on the New Situation of Global Ocean Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Deepak Nayyar, 2016. "Structural transformation in the world economy: On the significance of developing countries," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-102, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Fang Ye, 2023. "The New Development Bank and the structure of the multilateral development financial system," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 1957-1972, August.
    11. Mohammed Nuruzzaman, 2020. "Why BRICS Is No Threat to the Post-war Liberal World Order," International Studies, , vol. 57(1), pages 51-66, January.
    12. Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko & Muchhala, Bhumika, 2020. "The Southern origins of sustainable development goals: Ideas, actors, aspirations," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    13. Hussain, Arif & Perwez, Usama & Ullah, Kafait & Kim, Chul-Hwan & Asghar, Nosheen, 2021. "Long-term scenario pathways to assess the potential of best available technologies and cost reduction of avoided carbon emissions in an existing 100% renewable regional power system: A case study of G," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Javier Vadell, 2019. "La iniciativa BRICS y China: entre la emergencia y la irrelevancia [A iniciativa BRICS e a China: entre a emergência e a irrelevância]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 29(2), pages 401-428, May-Augus.
    15. Margot Schüller & Jan Peter Wogart, 2017. "The emergence of post-crisis regional financial institutions in Asia—with a little help from Europe," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 483-501, December.
    16. Carlson, D'Arcy & Robinson, Stacy-ann & Blair, Catherine & McDonough, Marjorie, 2021. "China's climate ambition: Revisiting its First Nationally Determined Contribution and centering a just transition to clean energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. Rodrigo Fracalossi de Moraes, 2020. "Whither Security Cooperation in the BRICS? Between the Protection of Norms and Domestic Politics Dynamics," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(4), pages 439-447, September.
    18. Park, Albert Sanghoon, 2017. "Does the Development Discourse Learn from History?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 52-64.
    19. Suk Hyun & James F. Paradise, 2020. "Toward an Asian Monetary Fund: Ideas for Transition," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 19(2), pages 65-77, Summer.
    20. Acquaye, Adolf & Ibn-Mohammed, Taofeeq & Genovese, Andrea & Afrifa, Godfred A & Yamoah, Fred A & Oppon, Eunice, 2018. "A quantitative model for environmentally sustainable supply chain performance measurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 188-205.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:58:y:2021:i:3:p:363-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.