IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v9y2018i3p398-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

After the Paris Agreement: What Role for the BRICS in Global Climate Governance?

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Downie
  • Marc Williams

Abstract

The rising power of the BRICS is now at the centre of debates about the future of global governance. Despite the consensus that the political, economic and strategic differences between the BRICS trump the commonalities, the BRICS have managed a level of cooperation that has exceeded expectations. This has led to inquiries about their influence on several policy domains, especially global finance. However, less attention has been given to the role of the BRICS in global climate governance, especially in the aftermath of the Paris climate agreement in 2015. Following the Paris Agreement, and the US' withdrawal, this paper examines the capacity of the BRICS to re‐shape global climate governance. Based on an analysis of the emissions profile of the BRICS, and multilateral and bilateral meetings between BRICS countries since 2015, it argues that while significant obstacles to the BRICS acting as a coalition remain, there are areas that can be identified where cooperation could be scaled up in coming years.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Downie & Marc Williams, 2018. "After the Paris Agreement: What Role for the BRICS in Global Climate Governance?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(3), pages 398-407, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:9:y:2018:i:3:p:398-407
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12550
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12550?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rajesh Sharma & Muhammad Shahbaz & Pradeep Kautish & Xuan Vinh Vo, 2023. "Diversified imports as catalysts for ecological footprint: examining the BRICS experience," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 3153-3181, April.
    2. Hussain, Arif & Perwez, Usama & Ullah, Kafait & Kim, Chul-Hwan & Asghar, Nosheen, 2021. "Long-term scenario pathways to assess the potential of best available technologies and cost reduction of avoided carbon emissions in an existing 100% renewable regional power system: A case study of G," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Carlson, D'Arcy & Robinson, Stacy-ann & Blair, Catherine & McDonough, Marjorie, 2021. "China's climate ambition: Revisiting its First Nationally Determined Contribution and centering a just transition to clean energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Alexander Thompson, 2020. "Emerging Powers and Differentiation in Global Climate Institutions," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 61-72, October.
    5. Francesco Petrone, 2021. "BRICS and Global Governance: Will the Grouping be able to Reform the United Nations Security Council?," International Studies, , vol. 58(3), pages 363-379, July.
    6. Francesco Petrone, 2020. "What If Soft Power Becomes the New Weapon for World Leadership? Considerations on the Debate in Relation to the New World Order," Proceedings of the 17th International RAIS Conference, June 1-2, 2020 020fp, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:9:y:2018:i:3:p:398-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.