IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p10921-d1192384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Perspectives on the New Situation of Global Ocean Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Yitong Chen

    (Law School, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Huirong Liu

    (Law School, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

Abstract

Global ocean governance is the concretization of global governance. Various interest groups interact with and coordinate ocean issues. Global ocean governance is inevitably linked to the new global governance landscape. In recent years, a series of new scenarios in global governance have emerged. These situations have further shaped the plurality of participants and the diversity of mechanisms in global ocean governance. Science and technology innovation and application are prerequisites and prime movers for the evolution of global ocean governance. Major worldwide crises, represented by global climate change and the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, have added great uncertainty to the future development of global ocean governance. The divergence of interests and positions between emerging countries and developed countries, as well as the reshaping of the global geopolitical landscape in recent years, has led to the stagnation or deadlock of a series of international negotiations and international cooperation platforms related to global ocean governance. With the deepening of global governance, non-state actors are not only objects of ocean governance but also bearers of legal obligations and enjoy varying degrees of legal rights, participating in agenda setting, rule construction, and monitoring implementation at different levels of ocean governance. From a critical jurisprudence perspective, in the practice of global ocean governance, the relationship between non-governmental organizations, states, and international organizations is more likely to be one of reconciliation than the “state–civil society” dichotomy of moral imagination. This new set of circumstances exposes the divisive and fragmented nature of global ocean governance. This study concludes that the new situation of global ocean governance constitutes a historic opportunity for countries to reexamine the role of the rule of law during the Anthropocene to bridge the fragmentation and gaps in mechanisms and achieve a truly integrated, holistic, and closely nested global ocean governance. The question of how to implement the rule of law requires the introduction of theoretical perspectives such as the Anthropocene, complex systems theory, and the community of a shared future for humanity to undertake a fundamental critical reflection and rethinking of global ocean governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yitong Chen & Huirong Liu, 2023. "Critical Perspectives on the New Situation of Global Ocean Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10921-:d:1192384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10921/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10921/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikael Lind & Robert Ward & Michael Bergmann & Sandra Haraldson & Almir Zerem & Jan Hoffmann & Erik Eklund, 2021. "Maritime Informatics for Increased Collaboration," Progress in IS, in: Mikael Lind & Michalis Michaelides & Robert Ward & Richard T. Watson (ed.), Maritime Informatics, pages 113-136, Springer.
    2. Robert Ward & Niels Bjørn-Andersen, 2021. "The Origins of Maritime Informatics," Progress in IS, in: Mikael Lind & Michalis Michaelides & Robert Ward & Richard T. Watson (ed.), Maritime Informatics, pages 5-11, Springer.
    3. Deepak Nayyar, 2016. "BRICS, developing countries and global governance," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 575-591, April.
    4. Jin Hyoung Park & Mikael Lind & Niels Bjørn-Andersen & Thomas Christensen & Fredrik Elern & Fred Pot, 2021. "Maritime Informatics for Recreational and Fishing Vessels," Progress in IS, in: Mikael Lind & Michalis Michaelides & Robert Ward & Richard T. Watson (ed.), Maritime Informatics, pages 237-253, Springer.
    5. Knol, Maaike, 2010. "Scientific advice in integrated ocean management: The process towards the Barents Sea plan," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 252-260, March.
    6. Paul J. Crutzen, 2002. "Geology of mankind," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6867), pages 23-23, January.
    7. Scott L. Kastner & Margaret M. Pearson & Chad Rector, 2020. "China and Global Governance: Opportunistic Multilateralism," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(1), pages 164-169, February.
    8. Sumaila, U.R. & Alder, J. & Keith, H., 2006. "Global scope and economics of illegal fishing," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 696-703, November.
    9. Malin Pinsky & Michael Fogarty, 2012. "Lagged social-ecological responses to climate and range shifts in fisheries," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 883-891, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mingfei Ma & Xinyang Liu, 2023. "The Control of Microplastic Pollution in Semi-Closed Seas: Good-Faith Cooperation and Regional Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-12, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evi Plomaritou & Sotiris Jeropoulos, 2022. "The digitalisation in chartering business: special reference to the role of e-bill of lading in the bulk and liner markets," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Eli D. Lazarus, 2017. "Toward a Global Classification of Coastal Anthromes," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-27, February.
    3. Jiaxing Cui & Xuesong Kong & Jing Chen & Jianwei Sun & Yuanyuan Zhu, 2021. "Spatially Explicit Evaluation and Driving Factor Identification of Land Use Conflict in Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Tommaso Luzzati & Angela Parenti & Tommaso Rughi, 2017. "Spatial error regressions for testing the Cancer-EKC," Discussion Papers 2017/218, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    5. Andreas Bjurström & Merritt Polk, 2011. "Climate change and interdisciplinarity: a co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(3), pages 525-550, June.
    6. J. Park & T. P. Seager & P. S. C. Rao & M. Convertino & I. Linkov, 2013. "Integrating Risk and Resilience Approaches to Catastrophe Management in Engineering Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 356-367, March.
    7. Anne P. M. Velenturf & Phil Purnell, 2017. "Resource Recovery from Waste: Restoring the Balance between Resource Scarcity and Waste Overload," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Damien Bazin & Sylvie Ferrari & Richard B. Howarth, 2021. "Introducing Environmental Ethics into Economic Analysis: Some Insights from Hans Jonas' Imperative of Responsibility," GREDEG Working Papers 2021-05, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    9. C. Michael Wernerheim & Richard L. Haedrich, 2007. "A Simple Empirical Model of Data Fouling by High-Grading in Capture Fisheries," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 83(1), pages 74-85.
    10. Ethan Gordon & Federico Davila & Chris Riedy, 2022. "Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 809-826, June.
    11. Tovar, Beatriz & Wall, Alan, 2022. "The relationship between port-level maritime connectivity and efficiency," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & WorldFish Center, 2008. "Small-scale capture fisheries: a global overview with emphasis on developing countries: a preliminary report of the Big Numbers Project," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 37878, April.
    13. Nancy Grimm & Peter Groffman & Michelle Staudinger & Heather Tallis, 2016. "Climate change impacts on ecosystems and ecosystem services in the United States: process and prospects for sustained assessment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 97-109, March.
    14. Kotval-K, Zeenat & Vojnovic, Igor, 2016. "A socio-ecological exploration into urban form: The environmental costs of travel," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 87-98.
    15. Rachel Mazac & Hanna L. Tuomisto, 2020. "The Post-Anthropocene Diet: Navigating Future Diets for Sustainable Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Luzzati, Tommaso & Orsini, Marco & Gucciardi, Gianluca, 2018. "A multiscale reassessment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve for energy and CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 612-621.
    17. Loredana Antronico & Roberto Coscarelli & Francesco De Pascale & Dante Di Matteo, 2020. "Climate Change and Social Perception: A Case Study in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
    18. Sean Pascoe & Tomas A. Okey & Shane Griffiths, 2008. "Economic and ecosystem impacts of illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) fishing in Northern Australia ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 52(4), pages 433-452, December.
    19. Robert Grosse & Jonas Gamso & Roy C. Nelson, 2021. "China’s Rise, World Order, and the Implications for International Business," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 1-26, March.
    20. Toni Ruuska & Pasi Heikkurinen & Kristoffer Wilén, 2020. "Domination, Power, Supremacy: Confronting Anthropolitics with Ecological Realism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10921-:d:1192384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.