IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intstu/v45y2008i2p89-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Putin's Legacy and the State of Democracy in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Rajan Kumar

    (The author is Assistant Professor, Centre for Russian & Central Asian Studies, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. E-mail: rajan75jnu@gmail.com)

Abstract

Two terms of Putin's presidency set in motion a dichotomous trend of growth and stability, on the one hand, and stifling of political and civil liberties, on the other. This was an inevitable outcome of Putin's policies, which laid more emphasis on growth and stability than democratisation of Russia. This imbalance has led to a divergence of assessments and interpretations by the experts. While most of the Russian scholars consider Putin to be a remarkable president, their counterparts from the West condemn him as an authoritarian ruler who derailed the progress of democracy in Russia. Against this backdrop, this article argues that some of the centralization measures of Putin were necessary to keep Russia united and growing. But his attempts at consolidation of the hold of a single party over the legislature militate against one of the fundamental democratic principles of separation of powers between the legislature and the executive. While this has provided unbridled powers to the president, the process of the growth of a strong opposition party in Russia has suffered a definite setback. As a powerful president, Putin emerged as the chief architect of a nation-in-the-making. Under him, national-ism triumphed but democracy staggered.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajan Kumar, 2008. "Putin's Legacy and the State of Democracy in Russia," International Studies, , vol. 45(2), pages 89-103, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:45:y:2008:i:2:p:89-103
    DOI: 10.1177/002088170804500201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002088170804500201
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002088170804500201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Yi, 1997. "Democracy, Political Stability and Economic Growth," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 391-418, July.
    2. Lipset, Seymour Martin, 1959. "Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy1," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 69-105, March.
    3. Andrei Shleifer & Daniel Treisman, 2005. "A Normal Country: Russia After Communism," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(1), pages 151-174, Winter.
    4. Nita Rudra, 2005. "Globalization and the Strengthening of Democracy in the Developing World," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(4), pages 704-730, October.
    5. Andrew Konitzer & Stephen K. Wegren, 0. "Federalism and Political Recentralization in the Russian Federation: United Russia As the Party of Power," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 36(4), pages 503-522.
    6. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226731445 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Desai, Padma, 2006. "Conversations on Russia: Reform from Yeltsin to Putin," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195300611.
    8. Oleh Protsyk, 2004. "Ruling with decrees: presidential decree making in Russia and Ukraine," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(5), pages 637-660.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berhanu Nega, 2011. "Short Changing the Value of Democracy for Economic Development in Africa," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 40(3), pages 313-334, October.
    2. Salahodjaev, Raufhon, 2015. "Democracy and economic growth: the role of intelligence in cross-country regressions," MPRA Paper 65716, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 26 Apr 2015.
    3. Berhanu Nega, 2011. "Short Changing the Value of Democracy for Economic Development in Africa," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 313-334, January.
    4. Tang, Sam Hak Kan & Yung, Linda Chor Wing, 2008. "Does rapid economic growth enhance democratization? Time-series evidence from high performing Asian economies," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 244-253, June.
    5. Mishra, Sudhanshu K, 2018. "A Simultaneous Equation Model of Globalization, Corruption, Democracy, Human Development and Social Progress," MPRA Paper 84213, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Ryan H Murphy, 2020. "Does democracy die in recessions? A descriptive analysis of aggregate demand shortfalls and regime transition," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 63-76, February.
    7. John A. Doces & Christopher S. P. Magee, 2015. "Trade and Democracy: A Factor-Based Approach," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 407-425, March.
    8. Jeffrey Edwards & Frank Thames, 2010. "Growth volatility and the interaction between economic and political development," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 183-201, August.
    9. Philip Nel, 2006. "When Can the Rabble Redistribute? Democratization and Income Distribution in Low- and Middle-income Countries," Working Papers 43, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    10. Bougharriou, Nouha & Benayed, Walid & Gabsi, Foued Badr, 2019. "The democracy and economic growth nexus: Do FDI and government spending matter? Evidence from the Arab world," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 13, pages 1-29.
    11. Saul Estrin & Svetlana Poukliakova & Daniel Shapiro, 2009. "The Performance Effects of Business Groups in Russia," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 393-420, May.
    12. Pakhnin, M. & Shapovalov, R., 2023. "Democratic capital and economic growth in the countries of the third wave of democratization," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 58(1), pages 12-31.
    13. Eatzaz Ahmad & Muhammad Zakaria, 2011. "Openness and Democracy: Some Evidence from Pakistan," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 175-185.
    14. Krenz, Astrid, 2016. "Do political institutions influence international trade? Measurement of institutions and the Long-Run effects," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 276, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    15. Sudhanshu K. Mishra, 2018. "A Study on Regime Type and Globalization in Simultaneous Equation Framework," Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis, Tripal Publishing House, vol. 2(1), pages 99-128.
    16. Shereen Nosier & Aya El-Karamani, 2018. "The Indirect Effect of Democracy on Economic Growth in the MENA Region (1990–2015)," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Baris Kablamaci, 2019. "Does economic openness affect liberal and electoral democracy in a different way? Empirical evidence from developing countries," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 66(3), pages 404-433, July.
    18. Kalyvitis, Sarantis & Vlachaki, Irene, 2012. "When does more aid imply less democracy? An empirical examination," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 132-146.
    19. Chaudhry, Ahmed & Mazhar, Ummad, 2018. "Political competition and economic performance: Empirical evidence from Pakistan," Economics Discussion Papers 2018-27, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    20. Hayam Kim & Uk Heo, 2018. "International Organizations and Democracy Development: The Indirect Link," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(1), pages 423-438, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:45:y:2008:i:2:p:89-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.