IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indgen/v19y2012i2p321-340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engendering Policies and Programmes through Feminist Evaluation: Opportunities and Insights

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine Hay

Abstract

This article examines how feminist theory and practice is influencing the framing, methods and conduct of evaluation in India. It examines several sets of evaluation efforts and experiences and explores how feminist grounding and theory plays out in evaluation practice. Documenting and analysing experiences, perspectives and ideas from practice, the article aims at connecting them to emerging developments in evaluation and feminist theory. The article argues that in a broader context of development evaluation that privileges certain methods and approaches—feminist evaluators need stronger language for demonstrating and speaking to the strengths, rigour, validity (and limitations) of the approaches they are using. The argument is that in the context of persistent gender inequities, feminist evaluation must play a stronger role in understanding how societies change and what policies and programmes show promise in shifting norms and inequities.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine Hay, 2012. "Engendering Policies and Programmes through Feminist Evaluation: Opportunities and Insights," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 19(2), pages 321-340, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:indgen:v:19:y:2012:i:2:p:321-340
    DOI: 10.1177/097152151201900208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097152151201900208
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097152151201900208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cornwall, Andrea, 2003. "Whose Voices? Whose Choices? Reflections on Gender and Participatory Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1325-1342, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hosein, Gabrielle & Basdeo-Gobin, Tricia & Gény, Lydia Rosa, 2020. "Gender mainstreaming in national sustainable development planning in the Caribbean," Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for The Caribbean 45086, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. Hillenbrand, E. & Karim, N. & Mohanraj, P. & Wu, D., 2015. "Measuring gender-transformative change: A review of literature and promising practices," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 40647, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shannon Sutton, 2012. "Add Producers and Stir? (Re) politicizing Fairtrade participation," Working Papers 38, Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research.
    2. J. C. Keenan & D. L. Kemp & R. B. Ramsay, 2016. "Company–Community Agreements, Gender and Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 607-615, June.
    3. Nitya Rao, 2018. "Global Agendas, Local Norms: Mobilizing around Unpaid Care and Domestic Work in Asia," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(3), pages 735-758, May.
    4. Khandelwal, Meena & Hill, Matthew E. & Greenough, Paul & Anthony, Jerry & Quill, Misha & Linderman, Marc & Udaykumar, H.S., 2017. "Why Have Improved Cook-Stove Initiatives in India Failed?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 13-27.
    5. Palash Kamruzzaman, 2020. "Exploring the Nexus Between Participation and Empowerment," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 5(1), pages 32-53, January.
    6. Palash Kamruzzaman, 2013. "Civil society or ‘comprador class’, participation or parroting?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 13(1), pages 31-49, January.
    7. Ragasa, Catherine, 2012. "Gender and Institutional Dimensions of Agricultural Technology Adoption: A Review of Literature and Synthesis of 35 Case Studies," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126747, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Annie George & Kim M Blankenship, 2015. "Peer Outreach Work as Economic Activity: Implications for HIV Prevention Interventions among Female Sex Workers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Michelle R. Brear & Rebecca Gordon, 2021. "Translating the Principle of Beneficence into Ethical Participatory Development Research Practice," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 109-126, January.
    10. Sarmiento Barletti, Juan Pablo & Larson, Anne M. & Hewlett, Christopher & Delgado, Deborah, 2020. "Designing for engagement: A Realist Synthesis Review of how context affects the outcomes of multi-stakeholder forums on land use and/or land-use change," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    11. Sonja Ayeb-Karlsson, 2020. "No Power without Knowledge: A Discursive Subjectivities Approach to Investigate Climate-Induced (Im)mobility and Wellbeing," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    12. James Sumberg & John Thompson & Philip Woodhouse, 2013. "Why agronomy in the developing world has become contentious," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(1), pages 71-83, March.
    13. Timothy J. Downs & Edward R. Carr & Rob Goble, 2017. "Re-imagining environmental science and policy graduate education for the twenty-first century using an integrative frame," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 177-188, June.
    14. John‐Michael Davis & Yaakov Garb, 2019. "Participatory shaping of community futures in e‐waste processing hubs: Complexity, conflict and stewarded convergence in a Palestinian context," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(1), pages 67-89, January.
    15. Rebecca Nixon & Francis Owusu, 2017. "Choice, Inclusion, and Access to Information: Understanding Female Farmers’ Participation in Kyrgyzstan’s Water-User Associations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Umar, B.B. & Nyanga, P.H. & Chibamba, D. & Nchito, W.S., 2020. "Women’s empowerment, land and donor-driven agricultural interventions in Eastern Zambia," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    17. S. Revi Sterling & John O’Brien & John K. Bennett, 2009. "Advancement through interactive radio," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 145-154, April.
    18. Breuer, Anita & Asiedu, Edward, 2017. "Can Gender-Targeted Employment Interventions Help Enhance Community Participation? Evidence from Urban Togo," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 390-407.
    19. Jessica A Kaminsky, 2017. "Culturally appropriate organization of water and sewerage projects built through public private partnerships," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Chapwa Kasoma & Hussein Shimelis & Mark D. Laing & Admire Shayanowako & Isack Mathew, 2021. "Outbreaks of the Fall Armyworm ( Spodoptera frugiperda ), and Maize Production Constraints in Zambia with Special Emphasis on Coping Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indgen:v:19:y:2012:i:2:p:321-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.