IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/iimkoz/v7y2018i2p109-121.html

Assessing Cognitive Ethical Logics for Commercial Emotions

Author

Listed:
  • Tuheena Mukherjee
  • Kanika T. Bhal

Abstract

The usefulness of cognitive ethical logic in understanding the ethicality of emotional labour at commercial establishments cannot be undermined, and drawing on this perspective, the present study explores the derived moral logics for commercialized emotions especially in the context of call centres in two distinct subsets of professionals: potential working professionals and working professionals with experience. A sample of 129 respondents has been used for collecting data through open-ended questions and vignettes, which were designed to extract the perception of ethicality for emotional labour. The content of the responses were analysed by using cues from the grounded theory framework. Results indicate that both the respondent subgroups present equally strong consideration of emotional labour as unethical and not- unethical (rather than ethical). Threatened employee dignity emerges as the most important logic for considering emotional labour as unethical, while for the same to be considered not-unethical, the role of job description and compensatory justice gain significance. The results of the study have been discussed with the help of various frameworks of business ethics.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuheena Mukherjee & Kanika T. Bhal, 2018. "Assessing Cognitive Ethical Logics for Commercial Emotions," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 7(2), pages 109-121, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:iimkoz:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:109-121
    DOI: 10.1177/2277975218770027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2277975218770027
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2277975218770027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hosmer, LaRue Tone & Kiewitz, Christian, 2005. "Organizational Justice: A Behavioral Science Concept with Critical Implications for Business Ethics and Stakeholder Theory," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 67-91, January.
    2. George Callaghan & Paul Thompson, 2002. "‘We Recruit Attitude’: The Selection and Shaping of Routine Call Centre Labour," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 233-254, March.
    3. White, Mark D., 2004. "Can homo economicus follow Kant's categorical imperative?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 89-106, March.
    4. Bowie, Norman E., 2000. "Business Ethics, Philosophy, and the Next 25 Years," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 7-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pauline Fatien & Dima Louis & Gazi Islam, 2023. "Neutral In‐Tensions: Navigating Neutrality in Coaching," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1485-1520, September.
    2. Sertan Kabadayi & Linda Alkire (née Nasr) & Garrett M. Broad & Reut Livne-Tarandach & David Wasieleski & Ann Marie Puente, 2019. "Humanistic Management of Social Innovation in Service (SIS): an Interdisciplinary Framework," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 159-185, December.
    3. Jufrizen & Hazmanan Khair & Adek Trisma Dina & Molana Malik Pandia, 2024. "Factor Affecting Workplace Spirituality, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Evidence from Indonesia," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 27-48.
    4. Kevin Money & Anastasiya Saraeva & Irene Garnelo-Gomez & Stephen Pain & Carola Hillenbrand, 2017. "Corporate Reputation Past and Future: A Review and Integration of Existing Literature and a Framework for Future Research," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 193-211, November.
    5. Sharon C. Bolton, 2009. "Getting to the heart of the emotional labour process: a reply to Brook," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(3), pages 549-560, September.
    6. Muel Kaptein, 2022. "The Moral Duty to Love One’s Stakeholders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 813-827, October.
    7. Elena Casprini & Rocco Palumbo & Jacopo Cammeo & Lorenzo Zanni, 2025. "A ‘Grey’ Side of Family Business Ethics? Looking into the Interplay of Internal and External Ethical Orientations: Empirical Insights from the Wine Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(4), pages 749-770, May.
    8. Peter Seele, 2018. "What Makes a Business Ethicist? A Reflection on the Transition from Applied Philosophy to Critical Thinking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 647-656, July.
    9. Jos Gamble, 2007. "The rhetoric of the consumer and customer control in China," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 21(1), pages 7-25, March.
    10. Kirchgassner, Gebhard, 2005. "(Why) are economists different?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 543-562, September.
    11. Groening, Christopher & Kanuri, Vamsi Krishna, 2013. "Investor reaction to positive and negative corporate social events," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1852-1860.
    12. Gary Burkhardt & Frederic Boy & Daniele Doneddu & Nick Hajli, 2023. "Privacy Behaviour: A Model for Online Informed Consent," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 237-255, August.
    13. Sophie Harnay & Élisabeth Tovar, 2017. "Obeying vs. resisting unfair laws. A structural analysis of the internalization of collective preferences on redistribution using classification trees and random forests," Working Papers hal-04141635, HAL.
    14. Johan Graafland & Corrie Mazereeuw-Van der Duijn Schouten, 2012. "Motives for Corporate Social Responsibility," De Economist, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 377-396, December.
    15. Michel Renault & Yvan Renou, 2007. "Processus d'individuation, éthique et pragmatisme. A la recherche de fondements théoriques pour appréhender la firme partenariale," Post-Print halshs-00202148, HAL.
    16. Veledar Benina & Bašić Meliha, 2021. "A Bibliometric Overview of Business Ethics," Journal of Forensic Accounting Profession, Sciendo, vol. 1(1), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Guillemette de Larquier & Emmanuelle Marchal, 2020. "Les repères de la sélection à l’embauche et leur évaluation. Une exploration de l’enquête Ofer," Working Papers halshs-02943049, HAL.
    18. van Burg, E. & Gilsing, V.A. & Reymen, I.M.M.J. & Romme, A.G.L., 2008. "Creating university spin-offs : A science-based design perspective," Other publications TiSEM ed13609d-fde4-43dc-ba8a-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Graafland, J.J. & Kaptein, M. & Mazereeuw V/d Duijn Schouten, C., 2010. "Motives of Socially Responsible Business Conduct," Other publications TiSEM 3053983b-5552-408c-86a4-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Mathieu Guigourez, 2025. "Commitment, Kantian Economics and Climate Change: Rethinking Rational Choice and Individual Responsibility," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 25002, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:iimkoz:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:109-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.