IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/iimkoz/v7y2018i1p13-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Credible Reviews on Brand Image: A Mixed Method Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Uttam Chakraborty
  • Savita Bhat

Abstract

Rapid growth of online social media reduces the marketer’s control over brand management. Consumers share their brand-related experiences (through online reviews) in various online social media platforms. It is a major challenge for the marketers to understand the effects of online reviews on a brand’s image. This study addresses the issue and attempts to understand the effects of online reviews on brand image. The concept of brand image is broken up into two parts, namely, functional and hedonic. The study follows a mixed method approach using both quantitative and qualitative techniques. Quantitative techniques have been used to measure the objective experiences of the consumers, whereas qualitative techniques have been used to examine the subjective experiences of the consumers. For quantitative technique, structural equation modelling (SEM) has been adopted to determine the relationships between the variables. For qualitative technique, netnography has been followed. Quantitative data analysis reveals that online credible reviews have more significant effect on hedonic brand image. Qualitative study also shows evidences of functional and hedonic brand images in online community. Future directions for research are mentioned as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Uttam Chakraborty & Savita Bhat, 2018. "Effect of Credible Reviews on Brand Image: A Mixed Method Approach," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 7(1), pages 13-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:iimkoz:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:13-22
    DOI: 10.1177/2277975217733873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2277975217733873
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2277975217733873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kostyra, Daniel S. & Reiner, Jochen & Natter, Martin & Klapper, Daniel, 2016. "Decomposing the effects of online customer reviews on brand, price, and product attributes," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 11-26.
    2. Subin Sudhir & Anandakuttan B. Unnithan, 2014. "Measuring Consumer Motivations to Share Rumors: Scale Development," International Journal of Online Marketing (IJOM), IGI Global, vol. 4(3), pages 51-67, July.
    3. Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne, 1985. "Measuring the Involvement Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 341-352, December.
    4. Mafael, Alexander & Gottschalk, Sabrina A. & Kreis, Henning, 2016. "Examining Biased Assimilation of Brand-related Online Reviews," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 91-106.
    5. Folkes, Valerie S, 1988. "Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(4), pages 548-565, March.
    6. Filieri, Raffaele, 2015. "What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1261-1270.
    7. Költringer, Clemens & Dickinger, Astrid, 2015. "Analyzing destination branding and image from online sources: A web content mining approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1836-1843.
    8. Manfred Bruhn & Verena Schoenmueller & Daniela B. Schäfer, 2012. "Are social media replacing traditional media in terms of brand equity creation?," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(9), pages 770-790, August.
    9. Som, Anirban & Lee, Yih Hwai, 2012. "The joint effects of choice assortment and regulatory focus on choice behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 202-209.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aravind Reghunathan & Sridhar G, 2023. "Enjoy Your Favourite Book as a Movie: Using an Experiential Learning Exercise to Improve Student Understanding of Brand Extensions and Marketing Plan Preparation," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 12(1), pages 112-126, January.
    2. Simon Chadwick & Alex Fenton & Richard Dron & Wasim Ahmed, 2021. "Social Media Conversations About High Engagement Sports Team Brands," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 178-191, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elvira Ismagilova & Emma L. Slade & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2020. "The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth Communications on Intention to Buy: A Meta-Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1203-1226, October.
    2. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    3. Dima Sawaftah & Ahmad Aljarah & Eva Lahuerta-Otero, 2021. "Power Brand Defense Up, My Friend! Stimulating Brand Defense through Digital Content Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Algharabat, Raed & Rana, Nripendra P. & Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Baabdullah, Abdullah & Gupta, Ashish, 2020. "Investigating the antecedents of customer brand engagement and consumer-based brand equity in social media," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. Molinillo, Sebastian & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Anaya-Sánchez, Rafael & Buhalis, Dimitrios, 2018. "DMO online platforms: Image and intention to visit," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 116-130.
    6. Bitty Balducci & Detelina Marinova, 2018. "Unstructured data in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 557-590, July.
    7. Miyea Kim & Jeongsoo Han & Mina Jun, 2020. "Do same-level review ratings have the same level of review helpfulness? The role of information diagnosticity in online reviews," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 563-591, December.
    8. Carlson, Brad D. & Donavan, D. Todd & Deitz, George D. & Bauer, Brittney C. & Lala, Vishal, 2020. "A customer-focused approach to improve celebrity endorser effectiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 221-235.
    9. Langan, Ryan & Besharat, Ali & Varki, Sajeev, 2017. "The effect of review valence and variance on product evaluations: An examination of intrinsic and extrinsic cues," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 414-429.
    10. (Kay) Byun, Kyung-ah & Ma, Minghui & Kim, Kevin & Kang, Taeghyun, 2021. "Buying a New Product with Inconsistent Product Reviews from Multiple Sources: The Role of Information Diagnosticity and Advertising," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 81-103.
    11. Puccinelli, Nancy M. & Goodstein, Ronald C. & Grewal, Dhruv & Price, Robert & Raghubir, Priya & Stewart, David, 2009. "Customer Experience Management in Retailing: Understanding the Buying Process," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 15-30.
    12. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    13. Béatrice Parguel & Florence Benoît-Moreau, 2008. "Le rôle de la congruence entre l'enseigne et son engagement dans la construction du capital-marque par la communication sociétale : une approche par la théorie de l'attribution," Post-Print halshs-00271742, HAL.
    14. Giang Huong Duong & Wann-Yih Wu & Long Hoang Le, 2020. "The effects of brand page characteristics on customer brand engagement: moderating roles of community involvement and comedy production contents," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(5), pages 531-545, September.
    15. Patrick Mikalef & Kshitij Sharma & Ilias O. Pappas & Michail Giannakos, 2021. "Seeking Information on Social Commerce: An Examination of the Impact of User- and Marketer-generated Content Through an Eye-tracking Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1273-1286, September.
    16. Pascal Güntürkün & Till Haumann & Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Jan Wieseke, 2023. "How attributions of coproduction motives shape customer relationships over time," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 990-1018, September.
    17. Zhu, Yongmin & Liu, Miaomiao & Zeng, Xiaohua & Huang, Pei, 2020. "The effects of prior reviews on perceived review helpfulness: A configuration perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 484-494.
    18. Elvira Ismagilova & Emma L. Slade & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 0. "The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth Communications on Intention to Buy: A Meta-Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    19. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2743 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Benedikt M. Brand & Cristopher Siegfried Kopplin & Theresa Maria Rausch, 2022. "Cultural differences in processing online customer reviews: holistic versus analytic thinkers," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1039-1060, September.
    21. Xue Fa Tong & David Yoon Kin Tong & Wai Sern Tam, 2016. "Food Tourism: The Melaka Gastronomic Experience," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 236-246, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:iimkoz:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:13-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.