IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v6y1982i5p649-672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility of Benefit-Cost Analysis of Data Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce D. Spencer

    (Northwestern University)

Abstract

Explicit consideration of benefits and costs is needed to determine how much to spendfor public data. It is argued that benefit-cost analysis is also feasible. In support of feasibility, a benefit-cost analysis of the 1970 census is discussed in some detail, with emphasis on allocative uses of the data. Other precedents are discussed for evaluating the production, analysis, and dissemination of forecasts and projections, data used for determining allocations, and physical monitoring data. The greatest potential value of benefit-cost analysis of data may be for social monitoring data, such as social and economic indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce D. Spencer, 1982. "Feasibility of Benefit-Cost Analysis of Data Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 6(5), pages 649-672, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:6:y:1982:i:5:p:649-672
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8200600505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8200600505
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8200600505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hirshleifer, J & Riley, John G, 1979. "The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information-An Expository Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1375-1421, December.
    2. Willis L. Peterson, 1967. "Return to Poultry Research in the United States," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 49(3), pages 656-669.
    3. Zvi Griliches, 1958. "Research Costs and Social Returns: Hybrid Corn and Related Innovations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66, pages 419-419.
    4. Freebairn, John W & Withers, Glenn A, 1979. "Welfare Effects of Salary Forecast Error in Professional Labour Markets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 61(2), pages 234-241, May.
    5. Smith, Lawrence N & Scherr, Bruce A, 1973. "Social Return to Public Information Services: Statistical Reporting of U.S. Farm Commodities: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(5), pages 1017-1019, December.
    6. James L. Pierce, 1974. "Quantitative Analysis for Decisions at the Federal Reserve," NBER Chapters, in: Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 3, number 1, pages 11-19, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Klevorick, Alvin K. & Kramer, Gerald H., 1973. "Social choice on pollution management: the genossenschaften," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 101-146, April.
    8. Hayami, Yujiro & Peterson, Willis, 1972. "Social Returns to Public Information Services: Statistical Reporting of U. S. Farm Commodities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 119-130, March.
    9. William D. Watson & Ronald G. Ridker, 1981. "Revising Water Pollution Standards in an Uncertain World," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(4), pages 485-506.
    10. R. K. Lindner & F. G. Jarrett, 1978. "Supply Shifts and the Size of Research Benefits," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(1), pages 48-58.
    11. David F. Bradford & Harry H. Kelejian, 1978. "The Value of Information for Crop Forecasting with Bayesian Speculators: Theory and Empirical Results," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 9(1), pages 123-144, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vere, David T. & Sinden, Jack A. & Campbell, M.H., 1980. "Social Benefits of Serrated Tussock Control in New South Wales," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(03), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Parton, Kevin A. & O'Brien, Melissa J., 2013. "A Farm-Level Approach to Examining Supply Shifts and Research Benefits," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 147088, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    3. Michael Harris & Alan Lloyd, 1991. "The Returns to Agricultural Research and the Underinvestment Hypothesis ‐ A Survey," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 24(3), pages 16-27, July.
    4. Vernon Ruttan, 1980. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 529-547, January.
    5. Fox, Glenn, 1985. "Social Rates Of Return To Public Investment In Agricultural Research And The Underinvestment Hypothesis: An Agnostic View," Staff Papers 14054, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    6. Jarrett, Frank G. & Lindner, Robert K., 1977. "Research Benefits Revisited," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(04), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Jean-Paul Chavas & Rulon D. Pope, 1984. "Information: Its Measurement and Valuation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(5), pages 705-710.
    8. Lusk, Jayson L., 2016. "From Farm Income to Food Consumption: Valuing USDA Data Products," C-FARE Reports 266593, Council on Food, Agricultural, and Resource Economics (C-FARE).
    9. Norton, George W., 1987. "Evaluating Social Science Research in Agriculture," Evaluating Agricultural Research and Productivity, Proceedings of a Workshop, Atlanta, Georgia, January 29-30, 1987, Miscellaneous Publication 52 50028, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
    10. Skold, Karl Durwood, 1989. "The integration of alternative information systems: an application to the Hogs and Pigs report," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010239, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Ahmed, Mohamed M. & Masters, William A. & Sanders, John H., 1995. "Returns from research in economies with policy distortions: hybrid sorghum in Sudan," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 183-192, August.
    12. Vernon Ruttan, 1982. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research revisited — A rejoinder," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 319-329, January.
    13. Griffith, Garry R., 1978. "An Ex Ante Evaluation of the National Pig Carcase Measurement and Information Service," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(03), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Widmer, Lorne & Fox, Glenn & Brinkman, George, 1987. "The Rate of Return to Beef Cattle Research in Canda," Working Papers 244821, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    15. Fuller, Stephen W. & Eastman, Clyde & Dewbre, Joe, 1973. "Marketing Efficiency And Equity: A Case Study Of An Area'S Cotton Ginning Industry," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 5(2), pages 1-6, December.
    16. Zachariah, Oswald E. R. & Fox, Glenn & Brinkman, George L., 1988. "The Returns to Broiler Research in Canada: 1968 to 1984," Department of Agricultural Economics and Business 258611, University of Guelph.
    17. Jones, Harold B., Jr., 1975. "Empirical Success Ratios In Usda Agricultural Utilization Research," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 1-6, December.
    18. Gardner, Bruce L., 1997. "Returns to Policy-Related Social Science Research in Agriculture," Working Papers 197845, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    19. Easter, K. William & Norton, George W., 1976. "Estimates Of Potential Returns From Added Research Budget For The Land Grant Universities," Staff Papers 13464, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    20. Christophe Gouel, 2020. "The Value of Public Information in Storable Commodity Markets: Application to the Soybean Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 846-865, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:6:y:1982:i:5:p:649-672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.