IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v33y2009i6p539-567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Approach for Addressing the Multiple Testing Problem in Social Policy Impact Evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Z. Schochet

    (Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, pschochet@mathematica-mpr.com)

Abstract

In social policy evaluations, the multiple testing problem occurs due to the many hypothesis tests that are typically conducted across multiple outcomes and subgroups, which can lead to spurious impact findings. This article discusses a framework for addressing this problem that balances Types I and II errors. The framework involves specifying confirmatory and exploratory analyses in study protocols, delineating confirmatory outcome domains, conducting t tests on composite domain outcomes, and applying multiplicity corrections to composites across domains to obtain summative impact evidence. The article presents statistical background and discusses multiplicity issues for subgroup analyses, designs with multiple treatments, and reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Z. Schochet, 2009. "An Approach for Addressing the Multiple Testing Problem in Social Policy Impact Evaluations," Evaluation Review, , vol. 33(6), pages 539-567, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:33:y:2009:i:6:p:539-567
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X09350590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X09350590
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X09350590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Wilks, 1938. "Weighting systems for linear functions of correlated variables when there is no dependent variable," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 3(1), pages 23-40, March.
    2. Gelman, Andrew & Stern, Hal, 2006. "The Difference Between," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 60, pages 328-331, November.
    3. John D. Storey, 2002. "A direct approach to false discovery rates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(3), pages 479-498, August.
    4. Richard J. Cook & Vern T. Farewell, 1996. "Multiplicity Considerations in the Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 159(1), pages 93-110, January.
    5. repec:mpr:mprres:5944 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    2. Jianqing Fan & Xu Han, 2017. "Estimation of the false discovery proportion with unknown dependence," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(4), pages 1143-1164, September.
    3. Shigeyuki Matsui & Hisashi Noma, 2011. "Estimating Effect Sizes of Differentially Expressed Genes for Power and Sample-Size Assessments in Microarray Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1225-1235, December.
    4. Lianming Wang & David B. Dunson, 2010. "Semiparametric Bayes Multiple Testing: Applications to Tumor Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 493-501, June.
    5. B. Moerkerke & E. Goetghebeur & J. De Riek & I. Roldán‐Ruiz, 2006. "Significance and impotence: towards a balanced view of the null and the alternative hypotheses in marker selection for plant breeding," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(1), pages 61-79, January.
    6. Zaili Fang & Inyoung Kim & Jeesun Jung, 2018. "Semiparametric Kernel-Based Regression for Evaluating Interaction Between Pathway Effect and Covariate," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(1), pages 129-152, March.
    7. Timothy B. Armstrong, 2014. "Adaptive Testing on a Regression Function at a Point," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1957R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Feb 2015.
    8. Nucera, Federico & Valente, Giorgio, 2013. "Carry trades and the performance of currency hedge funds," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 407-425.
    9. Iain Melvin & Jason Weston & William Stafford Noble & Christina Leslie, 2011. "Detecting Remote Evolutionary Relationships among Proteins by Large-Scale Semantic Embedding," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, January.
    10. Colin F. Camerer & Anna Dreber & Felix Holzmeister & Teck-Hua Ho & Jürgen Huber & Magnus Johannesson & Michael Kirchler & Gideon Nave & Brian A. Nosek & Thomas Pfeiffer & Adam Altmejd & Nick Buttrick , 2018. "Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 637-644, September.
    11. Chen, Song Xi & Guo, Bin & Qiu, Yumou, 2023. "Testing and signal identification for two-sample high-dimensional covariances via multi-level thresholding," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1337-1354.
    12. Lukas Haffert, 2019. "War mobilization or war destruction? The unequal rise of progressive taxation revisited," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 59-82, March.
    13. West, Kenneth D., 2006. "Forecast Evaluation," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 3, pages 99-134, Elsevier.
    14. Psaradellis, Ioannis & Laws, Jason & Pantelous, Athanasios A. & Sermpinis, Georgios, 2023. "Technical analysis, spread trading, and data snooping control," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 178-191.
    15. Michael A. Allen & Michael E. Flynn & Julie VanDusky-Allen, 2017. "Regions of Hierarchy and Security: US Troop Deployments, Spatial Relations, and Defense Burdens," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 397-423, May.
    16. Dvorkin Daniel & Biehs Brian & Kechris Katerina, 2013. "A graphical model method for integrating multiple sources of genome-scale data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(4), pages 469-487, August.
    17. Robert A. Connolly & Richard J. Rendleman, 2012. "What It Takes to Win on the PGA TOUR (If Your Name Is “Tiger” or If It Isn't)," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 554-576, December.
    18. V. T. Farewell, 2008. "Comment: Advancing public sector performance analysis by Professor C. J. Heinrich," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 391-395, September.
    19. Yuan Zhao, 2014. "Cross-sector fund performance comparison: the role of real estate mutual funds," ERES eres2014_213, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    20. Wang Chamont & Gevertz Jana L., 2016. "Finding causative genes from high-dimensional data: an appraisal of statistical and machine learning approaches," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 321-347, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:33:y:2009:i:6:p:539-567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.