IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v45y2013i10p2362-2378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fishing for Nature: The Politics of Subjectivity and Emotion in Scottish Inshore Fisheries Management

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Nightingale

    (School of Global Studies, PO Box 700, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden; and Institute of Geography and the Lived Environment, School of Geo Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, Scotland)

Abstract

This paper explores the relational emergence of subjects, emotions, and socionatures and their consequences for Scottish inshore fishery management. Using a conception of the embodied spatial production of individual and collective subjectivities, and the ‘ambivalence’ of the subject, I explore why some fishers are committed to sustaining the fishing ground and others are not. Many people who work the land or the sea have a deep respect for and attachment to those environments, but overexploit them to make a living. How is it that people whose livelihoods depend on ‘natural’ environments embody apparently contradictory relationships with those environments? I probe such contradictions by exploring how the boundaries between subjects and environments are formed, and the consequences for Scottish inshore fisheries management of such boundary un/making. Using work from socionature, subjectivity, and emotional geographies, I show how fishing subjectivities are highly political and produce emotional and practical responses that have real consequences for how fisheries management plays out. Attending to the way in which subjectivities position fishers differently in relation to their resources and fisheries policies is therefore vital for successful management.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Nightingale, 2013. "Fishing for Nature: The Politics of Subjectivity and Emotion in Scottish Inshore Fisheries Management," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(10), pages 2362-2378, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:45:y:2013:i:10:p:2362-2378
    DOI: 10.1068/a45340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a45340
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a45340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kraak, Sarah B.M. & Bailey, Nick & Cardinale, Massimiliano & Darby, Chris & De Oliveira, José A.A. & Eero, Margit & Graham, Norman & Holmes, Steven & Jakobsen, Tore & Kempf, Alexander & Kirkegaard, Es, 2013. "Lessons for fisheries management from the EU cod recovery plan," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 200-213.
    2. Phillipson, Jeremy & Symes, David, 2010. "Recontextualising inshore fisheries: The changing face of British inshore fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1207-1214, November.
    3. Raakjær Nielsen, Jesper, 2003. "An analytical framework for studying: compliance and legitimacy in fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 425-432, September.
    4. Grafton, R. Quentin & Hilborn, Ray & Squires, Dale & Tait, Maree & Williams, Meryl (ed.), 2010. "Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195370287, Decembrie.
    5. Pita, Cristina & Pierce, Graham J. & Theodossiou, Ioannis, 2010. "Stakeholders' participation in the fisheries management decision-making process: Fishers' perceptions of participation," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1093-1102, September.
    6. Jentoft, Svein, 2000. "Legitimacy and disappointment in fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 141-148, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maiko Nishi, 2023. "Japanese land reform in the new era? Farmers’ wellbeing and sustainable farmland management," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(3), pages 429-447, May.
    2. Arguello Calle, X. A., 2021. "Becoming a free dandelion," ISS Working Papers - General Series 679, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    3. Morales, Margaret C. & Harris, Leila M., 2014. "Using Subjectivity and Emotion to Reconsider Participatory Natural Resource Management," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 703-712.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schultz, Oliver J., 2015. "Defiance and obedience: Regulatory compliance among artisanal fishers in St Helena Bay," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 331-337.
    2. Sundström, Aksel, 2016. "Corruption and Violations of Conservation Rules: A Survey Experiment with Resource Users," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 73-83.
    3. Santiago, Jose L. & Ballesteros, Marta A. & Chapela, Rosa & Silva, Cristina & Nielsen, Kåre N. & Rangel, Mafalda & Erzini, Karim & Wise, Laura & Campos, Aida & Borges, Maria F. & Sala, Antonello & Vir, 2015. "Is Europe ready for a results-based approach to fisheries management? The voice of stakeholders," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 86-97.
    4. Finkbeiner, Elena M. & Basurto, Xavier, 2015. "Re-defining co-management to facilitate small-scale fisheries reform: An illustration from northwest Mexico," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 433-441.
    5. Nolde Nielsen, Kåre & Holm, Petter & Aschan, Michaela, 2015. "Results based management in fisheries: Delegating responsibility to resource users," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 442-451.
    6. Kerri Brick & Martine Visser & Justine Burns, 2012. "Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence from South African Fishing Communities," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 94(1), pages 133-152.
    7. Ramcilovic-Suominen, Sabaheta & Hansen, Christian P., 2012. "Why some forest rules are obeyed and others violated by farmers in Ghana: Instrumental and normative perspective of forest law compliance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 46-54.
    8. Lan Ho, 2015. "My boat my identity: Investment in tuna fishing in Viet Nam," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(3), pages 562-583, August.
    9. Sturla F. Kvamsdal, 2022. "Optimal Management of a Renewable Resource Under Multiple Regimes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 81(3), pages 481-499, March.
    10. Wallace, Scott & Turris, Bruce & Driscoll, John & Bodtker, Karin & Mose, Brian & Munro, Gordon, 2015. "Canada's Pacific groundfish trawl habitat agreement: A global first in an ecosystem approach to bottom trawl impacts," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 240-248.
    11. Baptiste Parent & Lauriane Mouysset & Antoine Missemer & Harold Levrel, 2023. "Building Integrated Models In Environmental And Natural Resource Economics: The Case Of Gordon’S 1954 Fishery Model," Post-Print hal-04250105, HAL.
    12. J. Allister McGregor, 2014. "Human wellbeing and sustainability: interdependent and intertwined," Chapters, in: Giles Atkinson & Simon Dietz & Eric Neumayer & Matthew Agarwala (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development, chapter 14, pages 217-234, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Wehner, Nicholas & Mackay, Mary & Jennings, Sarah & van Putten, E.I. & Sibly, Hugh & Yamazaki, Satoshi, 2018. "When push comes to shove in recreational fishing compliance, think ‘nudge’," MarXiv 2fyuc, Center for Open Science.
    14. Parés, Claudio & Dresdner, Jorge & Salgado, Hugo, 2015. "Who should set the total allowable catch? Social preferences and legitimacy in fisheries management institutions," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 36-43.
    15. Jules Selles, 2018. "Fisheries management: what uncertainties matter?," Working Papers hal-01824238, HAL.
    16. Thomas, Alyssa S. & Milfont, Taciano L. & Gavin, Michael C., 2015. "What determines fishers’ knowledge of and attitudes towards regulations? A case study from the Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 547-554.
    17. Yates, K.L., 2014. "View from the wheelhouse: Perceptions on marine management from the fishing community and suggestions for improvement," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 39-50.
    18. Omukuti, Jessica, 2020. "Challenging the obsession with local level institutions in country ownership of climate change adaptation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    19. Rodwell, Lynda D. & Lowther, Jason & Hunter, Charlotte & Mangi, Stephen C., 2014. "Fisheries co-management in a new era of marine policy in the UK: A preliminary assessment of stakeholder perceptions," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 279-286.
    20. Simon Birnbaum & Örjan Bodin & Annica Sandström, 2015. "Tracing the sources of legitimacy: the impact of deliberation in participatory natural resource management," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(4), pages 443-461, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:45:y:2013:i:10:p:2362-2378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.