IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v39y2007i7p1752-1769.html

Outliers and Spatial Dependence in Cross-Sectional Regressions

Author

Listed:
  • Jesús Mur

    (Department of Economic Analysis, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Jørgen Lauridsen

    (The Econometric Group, Department of Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark)

Abstract

Outliers are a risk factor in any econometric analysis. They are often observations that exert an excessive influence on the results and lower our confidence in the estimations. As a consequence, the attention given to their identification and treatment in the context of time series is not surprising. Our intention in the present paper is to advance in this same direction but now focusing the discussion on the impact of outliers on cross-sectional specifications. In particular, we will analyse the behaviour of the most habitual misspecification tests in this field in the presence of outliers. With this objective, we present a series of analytical results that try to delimit the effects suffered by these statistics and complete the study with a Monte Carlo exercise designed to measure their effect more precisely. According to our results, the impact of outliers can be very important, especially when several coincide in the sample.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesús Mur & Jørgen Lauridsen, 2007. "Outliers and Spatial Dependence in Cross-Sectional Regressions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(7), pages 1752-1769, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:39:y:2007:i:7:p:1752-1769
    DOI: 10.1068/a38207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a38207
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a38207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davidson, James, 1994. "Stochastic Limit Theory: An Introduction for Econometricians," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198774037.
    2. Robert P. Haining, 1995. "Data Problems in Spatial Econometric Modeling," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Luc Anselin & Raymond J. G. M. Florax (ed.), New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, chapter 7, pages 156-171, Springer.
    3. Luc Anselin & Raymond J. G. M. Florax, 1995. "Small Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models: Some Further Results," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Luc Anselin & Raymond J. G. M. Florax (ed.), New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, chapter 2, pages 21-74, Springer.
    4. Douglas M. Hawkins, 1980. "Critical Values for Identifying Outliers," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 29(1), pages 95-96, March.
    5. Raymond J. G. M. Florax & Thomas Graaff, 2004. "The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models: A Meta-Analysis of Simulation Studies," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Luc Anselin & Raymond J. G. M. Florax & Sergio J. Rey (ed.), Advances in Spatial Econometrics, chapter 2, pages 29-65, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fernando López Hernández, 2021. "In memoriam of Professor Jesús Mur (1961–2020)," Journal of Spatial Econometrics, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-5, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mur, Jesús & Angulo, Ana, 2009. "Model selection strategies in a spatial setting: Some additional results," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 200-213, March.
    2. Jesus Mur & Ana Angulo, 2005. "A closer look at the Spatial Durbin Model," ERSA conference papers ersa05p392, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Pede, Valerien O. & Florax, Raymond J.G.M. & Lambert, Dayton M., 2014. "Spatial econometric STAR models: Lagrange multiplier tests, Monte Carlo simulations and an empirical application," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 118-128.
    4. Stephan Brunow & Georg Hirte, 2006. "Age structure and regional economic growth," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 26(1), pages 3-23, March.
    5. Ana M. Angulo & Jesús Mur, 2011. "The Likelihood Ratio Test of Common Factors under Non-Ideal Conditions," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 21, pages 37-52.
    6. López, Fernando & Matilla-García, Mariano & Mur, Jesús & Marín, Manuel Ruiz, 2010. "A non-parametric spatial independence test using symbolic entropy," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2-3), pages 106-115, May.
    7. Jørgen Lauridsen & Jesus Mur, 2004. "Outliers in Cross-Sectional Regression," ERSA conference papers ersa04p27, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Jin, Fei & Lee, Lung-fei, 2013. "Cox-type tests for competing spatial autoregressive models with spatial autoregressive disturbances," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 590-616.
    9. Eleftheria Kontou & Noreen McDonald, 2021. "Associating ridesourcing with road safety outcomes: Insights from Austin, Texas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Li, Jia & Liao, Zhipeng & Zhou, Wenyu, 2025. "A general test for functional inequalities," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    11. Alberto Abadie & Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2020. "Sampling‐Based versus Design‐Based Uncertainty in Regression Analysis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 265-296, January.
    12. Pierre Perron & Yohei Yamamoto, 2022. "Structural change tests under heteroskedasticity: Joint estimation versus two‐steps methods," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 389-411, May.
    13. Hendrik Thiel & Stephan L. Thomsen, 2015. "Individual Poverty Paths and the Stability of Control-Perception," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 794, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    14. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & Ferrari, Claudio & Tei, Alessio, 2014. "Ports and regional development: A spatial analysis on a panel of European regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 44-55.
    15. H. Peter Boswijk & Jeroen Dalderop & Roger J. A. Laeven & Niels Marijnen, 2025. "Semiparametric Estimation of Probability Weighting Functions Implicit in Option Prices," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 25-022/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    16. Brüggemann, Ralf & Jentsch, Carsten & Trenkler, Carsten, 2016. "Inference in VARs with conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 69-85.
    17. Matteo Barigozzi & Matteo Luciani, 2019. "Quasi Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference of Large Approximate Dynamic Factor Models via the EM algorithm," Papers 1910.03821, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    18. Pentti Saikkonen & Rickard Sandberg, 2016. "Testing for a Unit Root in Noncausal Autoregressive Models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 99-125, January.
    19. Martins-Filho, Carlos & Yao, Feng & Torero, Maximo, 2018. "Nonparametric Estimation Of Conditional Value-At-Risk And Expected Shortfall Based On Extreme Value Theory," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 23-67, February.
    20. Davidson James & Rambaccussing Dooruj, 2015. "A Test of the Long Memory Hypothesis Based on Self-Similarity," Journal of Time Series Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 115-141, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:39:y:2007:i:7:p:1752-1769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.