IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v43y2022i3p229-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Analysis of the Bid-ask Spread in the Continuous Intraday Trading of the German Power Market

Author

Listed:
  • Clara Balardy

Abstract

Liquidity is decisive for a well-functioning market. As most of the literature on the subject is based on financial markets, the extrapolation of its insights to the power market is fragile. This paper shows the specificities of liquidity of the German power market. Using the bid-ask spread as a proxy, thanks to the detailed order book for the hourly contracts, I first describe the evolution of the liquidity over the trading session. The bid-ask spread has a “L-shaped†pattern over it. Second,I identify the four main drivers of the bid-ask spread: the volatility, the adjustments’ need (forecast errors), the activity and the concentration of the market. I find that an increase of the volatility or the market concentration increases the bid-ask spread while an increase of the adjustments’ need or the market activity decreases it.

Suggested Citation

  • Clara Balardy, 2022. "An Empirical Analysis of the Bid-ask Spread in the Continuous Intraday Trading of the German Power Market," The Energy Journal, , vol. 43(3), pages 229-256, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:43:y:2022:i:3:p:229-256
    DOI: 10.5547/01956574.43.3.cbal
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/01956574.43.3.cbal
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/01956574.43.3.cbal?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatih Karanfil and Yuanjing Li, 2017. "The Role of Continuous Intraday Electricity Markets: The Integration of Large-Share Wind Power Generation in Denmark," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    2. Glosten, Lawrence R. & Milgrom, Paul R., 1985. "Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 71-100, March.
    3. Karsten Neuhoff & Nolan Ritter & Aymen SalahAbou-El-Enien & Philippe Vassilopoulos, 2016. "Intraday Markets for Power: Discretizing the Continuous Trading?," Working Papers EPRG 1609, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/607 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Doojin Ryu, 2011. "Intraday price formation and bid–ask spread components: A new approach using a cross‐market model," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(12), pages 1142-1169, December.
    6. Weber, Christoph, 2010. "Adequate intraday market design to enable the integration of wind energy into the European power systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3155-3163, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Enzo Cogn'eville & Thomas Deschatre & Xavier Warin, 2024. "Battery valuation on electricity intraday markets with liquidity costs," Papers 2412.15959, arXiv.org.
    2. Konstantinos Chatziandreou & Sven Karbach, 2025. "Optimal Execution in Intraday Energy Markets under Hawkes Processes with Transient Impact," Papers 2504.10282, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hohl, Cody & Lo Prete, Chiara & Radhakrishnan, Ashish & Webster, Mort, 2023. "Intraday markets, wind integration and uplift payments in a regional U.S. power system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Ocker, Fabian & Jaenisch, Vincent, 2020. "The way towards European electricity intraday auctions – Status quo and future developments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Brijs, Tom & De Jonghe, Cedric & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Belmans, Ronnie, 2017. "Interactions between the design of short-term electricity markets in the CWE region and power system flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 36-51.
    4. Lilian M. de Menezes & Marianna Russo & Giovanni Urga, 2019. "Measuring and Assessing the Evolution of Liquidity in Forward Natural Gas Markets: The Case of the UK National Balancing Point," The Energy Journal, , vol. 40(1), pages 143-170, January.
    5. Lee, Jaeram & Ryu, Doojin & Yang, Heejin, 2021. "Does vega-neutral options trading contain information?," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 294-314.
    6. Märkle-Huß, Joscha & Feuerriegel, Stefan & Neumann, Dirk, 2018. "Contract durations in the electricity market: Causal impact of 15min trading on the EPEX SPOT market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 367-378.
    7. Lee, Jieun & Ryu, Doojin, 2019. "How does FX liquidity affect the relationship between foreign ownership and stock liquidity?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 101-119.
    8. Spodniak, Petr & Ollikka, Kimmo & Honkapuro, Samuli, 2019. "The relevance of wholesale electricity market places: the Nordic case," Papers WP631, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    9. Knaut, Andreas & Paschmann, Martin, 2017. "Decoding Restricted Participation in Sequential Electricity Markets," EWI Working Papers 2017-5, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI), revised 31 Aug 2017.
    10. Ryu, Doojin, 2016. "Considering all microstructure effects: The extension of a trade indicator model," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 107-110.
    11. Hu, Xiao & Jaraitė, Jūratė & Kažukauskas, Andrius, 2021. "The effects of wind power on electricity markets: A case study of the Swedish intraday market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Hu, Jing & Harmsen, Robert & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Worrell, Ernst & van den Broek, Machteld, 2018. "Identifying barriers to large-scale integration of variable renewable electricity into the electricity market: A literature review of market design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2181-2195.
    13. Alangi, Somayeh Rahimi & Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette, 2022. "Can the European intraday market be designed as a congestion management tool?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    14. Doojin Ryu, 2017. "Comprehensive market microstructure model: considering the inventory holding costs," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 183-201, March.
    15. Kuppelwieser, Thomas & Wozabal, David, 2021. "Liquidity costs on intraday power markets: Continuous trading versus auctions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Ioannis Boukas & Damien Ernst & Thibaut Th'eate & Adrien Bolland & Alexandre Huynen & Martin Buchwald & Christelle Wynants & Bertrand Corn'elusse, 2020. "A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Continuous Intraday Market Bidding," Papers 2004.05940, arXiv.org.
    17. Silva-Rodriguez, Lina & Sanjab, Anibal & Fumagalli, Elena & Virag, Ana & Gibescu, Madeleine, 2022. "Short term wholesale electricity market designs: A review of identified challenges and promising solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Lina Silva-Rodriguez & Anibal Sanjab & Elena Fumagalli & Ana Virag & Madeleine Gibescu, 2020. "Short Term Electricity Market Designs: Identified Challenges and Promising Solutions," Papers 2011.04587, arXiv.org.
    19. Shilpa Bindu & José Pablo Chaves Ávila & Luis Olmos, 2023. "Factors Affecting Market Participant Decision Making in the Spanish Intraday Electricity Market: Auctions vs. Continuous Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, July.
    20. Ryu, Doojin & Yang, Heejin & Yu, Jinyoung, 2022. "Insider trading and information asymmetry: Evidence from the Korea Exchange," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:43:y:2022:i:3:p:229-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.