IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v41y2020i2p143-166.html

Carbon Tax and Energy Intensity: Assessing the Channels of Impact using UK Microdata

Author

Listed:
  • Morakinyo O. Adetutu
  • Kayode A. Odusany
  • Thomas G. Weyman-Jones

Abstract

Prior empirical studies indicate that carbon taxes have a negative impact on energy intensity, yet, the literature is unable to shed much light on the channels through which a moderate carbon tax reduces industrial energy intensity. Using a two-stage econometric approach, we provide the first comprehensive analysis of the five components of the energy intensity gain (EIG) arising from the UK climate change levy (CCL). First, we propose an EIG decomposition based on a stochastic energy cost frontier and a confidential panel of UK manufacturing plants covering 2001-2006. In the second stage, we identify the impact of the CCL on EIG components using an instrumental variable (IV) approach that addresses the endogeneity of the carbon tax rules. Factor substitution and technological progress are the dominant firm responses to the CCL, while energy efficiency is surprisingly the least responsive component. Our findings underscore the challenge arising from overreliance on narrow energy policy objectives such as energy efficiency improvements, suggesting that a broader policy approach aimed at improving overall firm resource allocation might be more appropriate.

Suggested Citation

  • Morakinyo O. Adetutu & Kayode A. Odusany & Thomas G. Weyman-Jones, 2020. "Carbon Tax and Energy Intensity: Assessing the Channels of Impact using UK Microdata," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(2), pages 143-166, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:41:y:2020:i:2:p:143-166
    DOI: 10.5547/01956574.41.2.made
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/01956574.41.2.made
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/01956574.41.2.made?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur Lewbel, 2012. "Using Heteroscedasticity to Identify and Estimate Mismeasured and Endogenous Regressor Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 67-80.
    2. Barker, Terry & Ekins, Paul & Foxon, Tim, 2007. "Macroeconomic effects of efficiency policies for energy-intensive industries: The case of the UK Climate Change Agreements, 2000-2010," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 760-778, July.
    3. repec:aen:journl:2011v32-02-a03 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Filippini, Massimo & Hunt, Lester C., 2012. "US residential energy demand and energy efficiency: A stochastic demand frontier approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1484-1491.
    5. repec:aen:journl:2008v29-02-a02 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Philippe Aghion & Antoine Dechezleprêtre & David Hémous & Ralf Martin & John Van Reenen, 2016. "Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(1), pages 1-51.
    7. Reifschneider, David & Stevenson, Rodney, 1991. "Systematic Departures from the Frontier: A Framework for the Analysis of Firm Inefficiency," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 32(3), pages 715-723, August.
    8. Antonio Alvarez & Christine Amsler & Luis Orea & Peter Schmidt, 2006. "Interpreting and Testing the Scaling Property in Models where Inefficiency Depends on Firm Characteristics," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 201-212, June.
    9. repec:aen:journl:ej37-3-adetutu is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Battese, G E & Coelli, T J, 1995. "A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 325-332.
    11. Floros, Nikolaos & Vlachou, Andriana, 2005. "Energy demand and energy-related CO2 emissions in Greek manufacturing: Assessing the impact of a carbon tax," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 387-413, May.
    12. repec:aen:journl:ej39-1-pengzhou is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Morakinyo Adetutu & Anthony Glass & Karligash Kenjegalieva & Robin Sickles, 2015. "The effects of efficiency and TFP growth on pollution in Europe: a multistage spatial analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 307-326, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rui Tang & Dingyao Yu & Yongbo Tan, 2025. "Navigating the Carbon Challenge: Strategic Integration of Hybrid Policies in Green Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Su, Xuewei & Wang, Kaike, 2025. "Carbon dioxide emission reduction effects of non-economic sector tournaments: Evidence from the national civilized city selection," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Hua Li & Wei Zhao & Weijun Wang & Yifan Zhang & Qin Zhang, 2024. "What Determines Rural Residents’ Intention and Behavior Towards Clean Energy Use? Evidence from Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher F. Parmeter & Hung-Jen Wang & Subal C. Kumbhakar, 2017. "Nonparametric estimation of the determinants of inefficiency," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 205-221, June.
    2. Deng, Yaguo & Wiper, Michael Peter & Veiga, Helena, 2024. "A Bayesian semi-parametric approach to stochastic frontier models with inefficiency heterogeneity," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 43837, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    3. Antonio Alvarez & Carlos Arias, 2014. "A selection of relevant issues in applied stochastic frontier analysis," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 3-11.
    4. Young Hoon Lee, 2009. "Frontier Models and their Application to the Sports Industry," Working Papers 0903, Nam Duck-Woo Economic Research Institute, Sogang University (Former Research Institute for Market Economy), revised 2009.
    5. Subal C. Kumbhakar & Christopher F. Parmeter & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2022. "Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Foundations and Advances I," Springer Books, in: Subhash C. Ray & Robert G. Chambers & Subal C. Kumbhakar (ed.), Handbook of Production Economics, chapter 8, pages 331-370, Springer.
    6. Peter Schmidt, 2011. "One-step and two-step estimation in SFA models," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 201-203, October.
    7. Antti Saastamoinen, 2015. "Heteroscedasticity Or Production Risk? A Synthetic View," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 459-478, July.
    8. Shamsuzzoha & Makoto Tanaka, 2021. "The role of human capital on the performance of manufacturing firms in Bangladesh," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 21-33, January.
    9. Jorge Galán & Helena Veiga & Michael Wiper, 2014. "Bayesian estimation of inefficiency heterogeneity in stochastic frontier models," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 85-101, August.
    10. Federico Belotti & Giancarlo Ferrara, 2026. "Imposing Monotonicity in Stochastic Frontier Models: An Iterative Nonlinear Least Squares Procedure," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 68(2), pages 1155-1189, August.
    11. Jamasb, Tooraj & Llorca, Manuel & Khetrapal, Pavan & Thakur, Tripta, 2021. "Institutions and performance of regulated firms: Evidence from electricity distribution in India," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 68-82.
    12. Seunghwa Rho & Peter Schmidt, 2015. "Are all firms inefficient?," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 327-349, June.
    13. Jacob A. Bikker & Barbara Casu & Claudia Girardone & Mohamed E Chaffai & Michel Dietsch & Antonio Colangelo & Robert Inklaar & Marco Colagiovanni & Martin Czurda & Roger Hartmann & Charles-Henri Di Ma, 2009. "Productivity in the Financial Services Sector," SUERF Studies, SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum, number 2009/4 edited by Morten Balling & Ernest Gnan & Frank Lierman & Jean-Pierre Schoder, January-J.
    14. Amjadi, Golnaz & Lundgren, Tommy, 2022. "Is industrial energy inefficiency transient or persistent? Evidence from Swedish manufacturing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    15. Cliff Huang & Hung-pin Lai, 2012. "Estimation of stochastic frontier models based on multimodel inference," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 273-284, December.
    16. Young Hoon Lee, 2010. "The Effects of Management Practices on Productivity: Evidence from Baseball Team Production," Working Papers 1005, Nam Duck-Woo Economic Research Institute, Sogang University (Former Research Institute for Market Economy), revised 2010.
    17. Ajayi, V. & Weyman-Jones, T., 2021. "State-Level Electricity Generation Efficiency: Do Restructuring and Regulatory Institutions Matter in the US?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2166, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    18. Christine Amsler & Peter Schmidt & Wen-Jen Tsay, 2015. "A post-truncation parameterization of truncated normal technical inefficiency," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 209-220, October.
    19. Cheol-Keun Cho & Peter Schmidt, 2020. "The wrong skew problem in stochastic frontier models when inefficiency depends on environmental variables," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 2031-2047, May.
    20. Ajayi, Victor & Weyman-Jones, Tom, 2021. "State-level electricity generation efficiency: Do restructuring and regulatory institutions matter in the US?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:41:y:2020:i:2:p:143-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.