IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11109-d1546808.html

What Determines Rural Residents’ Intention and Behavior Towards Clean Energy Use? Evidence from Northwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Hua Li

    (College of Economics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Wei Zhao

    (College of Economics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Weijun Wang

    (College of Tourism, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Yifan Zhang

    (College of Economics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Qin Zhang

    (China Center for Modernization Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

Abstract

Two United Nations Sustainable Development Goals highlight that energy supply, conversion, transmission, and consumption are primary contributors to climate change, accounting for 60% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Exploring the influencing factors on the intention and behavior of clean energy use in rural areas is a crucial step in achieving the “Dual Carbon” target and global sustainable development goals. The article constructed a theoretical analysis framework of “environmental knowledge—perceived value—use intention—use behavior”. Taking Gansu Province, a typical case area in northwest China, as a case study, data from 766 survey questionnaires were used to analyze the characteristics and impact mechanism of clean energy use behavior among residents. This article finds that rural household energy use is moving towards low-carbon goals, but traditional energy remains an important component, especially in winter heating scenarios. Only the use intention has a direct promoting effect on use behavior, with a regression coefficient of 0.108. Perceived value and use intention play a chain-mediating role between environmental knowledge and use behavior. Residents with higher income levels, higher education levels, and poorer health conditions are more likely to develop clean energy use intention and behavior. At the same time, government intervention measures also have a promoting effect. Finally, countermeasures and suggestions for improving the public’s level of clean energy utilization in underdeveloped areas were proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua Li & Wei Zhao & Weijun Wang & Yifan Zhang & Qin Zhang, 2024. "What Determines Rural Residents’ Intention and Behavior Towards Clean Energy Use? Evidence from Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11109-:d:1546808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11109/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11109/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schmitt, Michael T. & Aknin, Lara B. & Axsen, Jonn & Shwom, Rachael L., 2018. "Unpacking the Relationships Between Pro-environmental Behavior, Life Satisfaction, and Perceived Ecological Threat," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 130-140.
    2. Xue, Chaokai & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Ahmed, Zahoor & Ahmad, Mahmood & Sinha, Avik, 2022. "Clean energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: What is the role of economic policy uncertainty?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 899-907.
    3. Mingyue Li & Jingjing Wang & Kai Chen & Lianbei Wu, 2020. "Willingness and Behaviors of Farmers’ Green Disposal of Pesticide Packaging Waste in Henan, China: A Perceived Value Formation Mechanism Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Piyapong Janmaimool & Samattaphong Khajohnmanee, 2019. "Roles of Environmental System Knowledge in Promoting University Students’ Environmental Attitudes and Pro-Environmental Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. repec:aen:journl:ej41-2-adetutu is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Morakinyo O. Adetutu & Kayode A. Odusany & Thomas G. Weyman-Jones, 2020. "Carbon Tax and Energy Intensity: Assessing the Channels of Impact using UK Microdata," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(2), pages 143-166, March.
    7. Ma, Yuan & Liu, Changshan, 2023. "Configuration analysis of influencing factors of energy-saving behaviors: From the perspective of consumers’ pro-environmental characteristics and environmentally friendly social atmosphere," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    8. Hoffmann, Roman & Kanitsar, Georg & Seifert, Marcel, 2024. "Behavioral barriers impede pro-environmental decision-making: Experimental evidence from incentivized laboratory and vignette studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ouyang, Wei & Liang, Chen & Zhou, Yang, 2026. "Back to the hearth: Unraveling the triple nexus of population aging, income descent, and regressive energy transition in rural households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Laura Mariana Cismaș & Luminița Vochița & Teodor Marian Cojocaru & Răducu-Ștefan Bratu, 2023. "Can Europe Reach Its Environmental Sustainability Targets by 2030? A Critical Mid-Term Assessment of the Implementation of the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Sun, Yunpeng & Tian, Wenjuan & Mehmood, Usman & Zhang, Xiaoyu & Tariq, Salman, 2023. "How do natural resources, urbanization, and institutional quality meet with ecological footprints in the presence of income inequality and human capital in the next eleven countries?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    3. Samridhi Tanwar & Aakash Khindri, 2026. "Three Decades of Life Satisfaction: A Bibliometric Review and Research Agenda," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 15(2), pages 184-198, March.
    4. Canelli, Rosa & Fontana, Giuseppe & Realfonzo, Riccardo & Passarella, Marco Veronese, 2024. "Energy crisis, economic growth and public finance in Italy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Bernardas Vaznonis & Algirdas Justinas Staugaitis & Gintarė Vaznonienė, 2024. "The Interrelationship between Pro-Environmental Attitudes and Subjective Well-Being: The Case of Central and Eastern European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Muhammad Asif & Jian-Qiao Li & Muhammad Azam Zia & Muhammad Hashim & Uzair Aslam Bhatti & Mughair Aslam Bhatti & Ahmad Hasnain, 2024. "Environmental Sustainability in BRICS Economies: The Nexus of Technology Innovation, Economic Growth, Financial Development, and Renewable Energy Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-29, August.
    7. Muhammad Sadiq & Syed Tauseef Hassan & Irfan Khan & Mohammad Mafizur Rahman, 2024. "Policy uncertainty, renewable energy, corruption and CO2 emissions nexus in BRICS-1 countries: a panel CS-ARDL approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21595-21621, August.
    8. Wang, Weilong & Xiao, Deheng & Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The cost of pollution in the digital era: Impediments of air pollution on enterprise digital transformation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Lorena Antunes Jimenez & Taissa Cambraia & Saulo Silvestre & Laisa Freire & Jose Julio de Toledo, 2025. "The influence of environmental attitudes on urban afforestation in the most preserved state of the Brazilian Amazon," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Ying Zhang & Hui-Ling Hu, 2025. "Media Influence on Tourists’ Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Analysis of Environmental Cognitive Evaluation in the Context of Chinese Tourism," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    11. Gkargkavouzi, Anastasia & Halkos, George & Matsiori, Steriani, 2019. "How do motives and knowledge relate to intention to perform environmental behavior? Assessing the mediating role of constraints," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Usman Mehmood & Salman Tariq & Zia Ul-Haq & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Salah Kamel & Mohamed Elnaggar & Hasan Nawaz & Ammar Hameed & Shafqat Ali, 2022. "Can Financial Institutional Deepening and Renewable Energy Consumption Lower CO 2 Emissions in G-10 Countries: Fresh Evidence from Advanced Methodologies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Leonhard K. Lades & Kate Laffan & Till O. Weber, 2020. "Do economic preferences predict pro-environmental behaviour?," Working Papers 202003, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    14. Xin Deng & Yating Zhan & Qian Qiao, 2025. "Improving Farmers’ Pesticide Packaging Waste Recycling Behavior: Using Smartphones to Access the Internet," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    15. Echeverría, Lucía & Gimenez-Nadal, José Ignacio & Molina, José Alberto, 2022. "Active Commuting and the Health of Workers," IZA Discussion Papers 15572, IZA Network @ LISER.
    16. Morgan Alamandi, 2025. "Sustainable Innovation Management: Balancing Economic Growth and Environmental Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-31, May.
    17. Claborn, Kelly A. & Brooks, Jeremy S., 2019. "Can We Consume Less and Gain More? Environmental Efficiency of Well-being at the Individual Level," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 110-120.
    18. Herziger, Atar & Claborn, Kelly A. & Brooks, Jeremy S., 2020. "Is There Hope for the Double Dividend? How Social Context Can Shape Synergies and Tradeoffs between Sustainable Consumption and Well-Being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Sahra Svensson-Hoglund & M. Joseph Sirgy & Jennifer D. Russell, 2025. "The Impact of Engagement in the Circular Economy on Consumer Well-being: A Review of Outcomes and Salient Contexts," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 20(6), pages 2299-2331, December.
    20. Lange, Florian & Dewitte, Siegfried, 2020. "Positive affect and pro-environmental behavior: A preregistered experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11109-:d:1546808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.