IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v39y2018i6p99-120.html

Evaluating an Interconnection Project: Do Strategic Interactions Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Sébastien Debia
  • David Benatia
  • Pierre-Olivier Pineau

Abstract

High-Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) merchant transmission lines allow trade across separate power markets and often in different countries. Flows on existing cross-border lines are often assessed as suboptimal, which may be due to the light regulation that often prevails in these cases. This paper studies the impact of market power on HVDC interconnections as a determinant of imperfect arbitrage. We assess the impact of Physical Transmission Rights (PTRs) allocation on the management of an HVDC interconnection between a thermal and a hydroelectricity market, assuming dynamic water management. We use a two-stage game formulated as an Equilibrium Problem with Equilibrium Constraints (EPEC) to model the strategic trade between the New York (US) and Quebec (Canada) systems. The numerical model is calibrated with public data. We find that although the interconnection can create wealth, a high concentration of PTRs can destroy value because of dumping strategies. The impact of trade on local price levels may be of concern and calls for the functional unbundling of traders and generators.

Suggested Citation

  • Sébastien Debia & David Benatia & Pierre-Olivier Pineau, 2018. "Evaluating an Interconnection Project: Do Strategic Interactions Matter?," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(6), pages 99-120, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:39:y:2018:i:6:p:99-120
    DOI: 10.5547/01956574.39.6.sdeb
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/01956574.39.6.sdeb
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/01956574.39.6.sdeb?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven A. Gabriel & Antonio J. Conejo & J. David Fuller & Benjamin F. Hobbs & Carlos Ruiz, 2013. "Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4419-6123-5, March.
    2. repec:aen:journl:ej37-1-pineau is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Xinmin Hu & Daniel Ralph, 2007. "Using EPECs to Model Bilevel Games in Restructured Electricity Markets with Locational Prices," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 809-827, October.
    4. repec:aen:journl:ej34-1-06 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Gert Brunekreeft & David Newbery, 2006. "Should merchant transmission investment be subject to a must-offer provision?," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 233-260, November.
    6. SMEERS, Yves & WEI, Jing-Yuan, 1997. "Do we need a power exchange if there are enough power marketers ?," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1997060, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christos N. Dimitriadis & Evangelos G. Tsimopoulos & Michael C. Georgiadis, 2021. "A Review on the Complementarity Modelling in Competitive Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Wang, Lu & Gu, Wei & Wu, Zhi & Qiu, Haifeng & Pan, Guangsheng, 2020. "Non-cooperative game-based multilateral contract transactions in power-heating integrated systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    3. Elisabetta Allevi & Didier Aussel & Rossana Riccardi, 2018. "On an equilibrium problem with complementarity constraints formulation of pay-as-clear electricity market with demand elasticity," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 329-346, February.
    4. Ioan Alexandru Puiu & Raphael Andreas Hauser, 2022. "A fundamental Game Theoretic model and approximate global Nash Equilibria computation for European Spot Power Markets," Papers 2208.14164, arXiv.org.
    5. Arriet, Andrea & Matis, Timothy I. & Feijoo, Felipe, 2024. "Electricity sector impacts of water taxation for natural gas supply under high renewable generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    6. Sheng Chen & Antonio J. Conejo, 2020. "Strategic-Agent Equilibria in the Operation of Natural Gas and Power Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Spiridonova, Olga, 2016. "Transmission capacities and competition in Western European electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 260-273.
    8. Awad, Ahmed S.A. & Ahmed, Mohamed Hassan & El-Fouly, Tarek H.M. & Salama, Magdy M.A., 2017. "The impact of wind farm location and control strategy on wind generation penetration and market prices," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 354-364.
    9. Megy, Camille & Massol, Olivier, 2023. "Is Power-to-Gas always beneficial? The implications of ownership structure," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    10. Tom Brijs & Daniel Huppmann & Sauleh Siddiqui & Ronnie Belmans, 2016. "Auction-Based Allocation of Shared Electricity Storage Resources through Physical Storage Rights," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1566, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    11. Egging-Bratseth, Ruud & Holz, Franziska & Czempinski, Victoria, 2021. "Freedom gas to Europe: Scenarios analyzed using the Global Gas Model," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. Gert Brunekreeft & David Newbery, 2006. "Should merchant transmission investment be subject to a must-offer provision?," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 233-260, November.
    13. Nouicer, Athir & Meeus, Leonardo & Delarue, Erik, 2023. "Demand-side flexibility in distribution grids: Voluntary versus mandatory contracting," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    14. Grimm, Veronika & Schewe, Lars & Schmidt, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2017. "Uniqueness of market equilibrium on a network: A peak-load pricing approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 971-983.
    15. Martin Weibelzahl & Alexandra Märtz, 2020. "Optimal storage and transmission investments in a bilevel electricity market model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(2), pages 911-940, April.
    16. Steven A. Gabriel & Supat Kiet & Jifang Zhuang, 2005. "A Mixed Complementarity-Based Equilibrium Model of Natural Gas Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 799-818, October.
    17. Brunekreeft, Gert & Neuhoff, Karsten & Newbery, David, 2005. "Electricity transmission: An overview of the current debate," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 73-93, June.
    18. Hassan Shavandi & Mehrdad Pirnia & J. David Fuller, 2018. "Extended opportunity cost model to find near equilibrium electricity prices under non-convexities," Papers 1809.09734, arXiv.org.
    19. de Frutos Cachorro, Julia & Willeghems, Gwen & Buysse, Jeroen, 2020. "Exploring investment potential in a context of nuclear phase-out uncertainty: Perfect vs. imperfect electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    20. Brayam Valqui & Mort D. Webster & Shanxia Sun & Thomas W. Hertel, 2023. "Coal-Biomass Co-firing within Renewable Portfolio Standards: Strategic Adoption by Heterogeneous Firms and Emissions Implications," The Energy Journal, , vol. 44(5), pages 115-148, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:39:y:2018:i:6:p:99-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.