IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v27y2026i1p136-178.html

The politics of the Court of Justice of the European Union: A review

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Gabel
  • Silje Synnøve Lyder Hermansen
  • Jay Krehbiel

Abstract

This essay reviews recent research on how the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) influences the development and enforcement of European Union (EU) law. First, we focus on the supply of cases and how the procedural routes to the court affect the impact of its rulings. Second, we discuss how the collective and individual preferences of the judges shape how they dispose of those cases. To that end, we present a measurement strategy and original dataset of ideological preferences on the court. Third, we examine the productivity of the court and the prospects for reducing the current backlog of the court. Finally, we present novel empirical analyses that connect these three sections and identify questions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Gabel & Silje Synnøve Lyder Hermansen & Jay Krehbiel, 2026. "The politics of the Court of Justice of the European Union: A review," European Union Politics, , vol. 27(1), pages 136-178, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:27:y:2026:i:1:p:136-178
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165251405487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165251405487
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165251405487?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Florian Smuda & Patrice Bougette & Kai Hüschelrath, 2015. "Determinants of the Duration of European Appellate Court Proceedings in Cartel Cases," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 1352-1369, November.
    2. Deniz Aksoy, 2012. "Institutional Arrangements and Logrolling: Evidence from the European Union," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(3), pages 538-552, July.
    3. Cheruvu, Sivaram & Krehbiel, Jay N., 2024. "Do Preliminary References Increase Public Support for European Law? Experimental Evidence from Germany," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 78(1), pages 170-187, January.
    4. Timothy Yu-Cheong Yeung & Michal Ovádek & Nicolas Lampach, 2022. "Time efficiency as a measure of court performance: evidence from the Court of Justice of the European Union," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 209-234, April.
    5. Mattli, Walter & Slaughter, Anne-Marie, 1998. "Revisiting the European Court of Justice," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(1), pages 177-209, January.
    6. Carrubba, Clifford J. & Gabel, Matthew & Hankla, Charles, 2008. "Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 102(4), pages 435-452, November.
    7. Marton Varju & Veronika Czina & Katalin Cseres & Ernő Várnay, 2024. "Annulment Actions and the V4: Taking Legislative Conflicts Before the CJEU," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    8. Garrett, Geoffrey, 1992. "International cooperation and institutional choice: the European Community's internal market," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 533-560, April.
    9. Junge, Dirk & König, Thomas & Luig, Bernd, 2015. "Legislative Gridlock and Bureaucratic Politics in the European Union," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 777-797, October.
    10. Garrett, Geoffrey, 1995. "The politics of legal integration in the European Union," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(01), pages 171-181, December.
    11. Weingast, Barry R & Marshall, William J, 1988. "The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 96(1), pages 132-163, February.
    12. Simon Hix & Abdul Noury & Gérard Roland, 2006. "Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(2), pages 494-520, April.
    13. Carruba, Clifford J. & Gabel, Matthew & Hankla, Charles, 2012. "Understanding the Role of the European Court of Justice in European Integration," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 106(1), pages 214-223, February.
    14. Chris W. Bonneau & Thomas H. Hammond & Forrest Maltzman & Paul J. Wahlbeck, 2007. "Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(4), pages 890-905, October.
    15. Sivaram Cheruvu, 2022. "When does the European Commission Pursue Noncompliance?," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(3), pages 375-397, September.
    16. Charles M. Cameron, 2007. "Bargaining and Opinion Assignment on the US Supreme Court," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 276-302, June.
    17. Karen J. Alter & Renaud Dehousse & Georg Vanberg, 2002. "Law, Political Science and EU Legal Studies," European Union Politics, , vol. 3(1), pages 113-136, March.
    18. Stefan Voigt, 2016. "Determinants of judicial efficiency: a survey," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 183-208, October.
    19. Thomas König & Stefan Eschenwecker, 2026. "The European Court of Justice and legal European integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 27(1), pages 32-59, March.
    20. Miriam Hartlapp, 2018. "Power Shifts via the Judicial Arena: How Annulments Cases between EU Institutions Shape Competence Allocation," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(6), pages 1429-1445, September.
    21. Gibson, James L. & Caldeira, Gregory A., 1998. "Changes in the Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice: A Post-Maastricht Analysis," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 63-91, January.
    22. Fjelstul, Joshua C. & Carrubba, Clifford J., 2018. "The Politics of International Oversight: Strategic Monitoring and Legal Compliance in the European Union," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 112(3), pages 429-445, August.
    23. Sivaram Cheruvu, 2025. "Are European Court of Justice judges biased towards their member states?," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 281-295, June.
    24. Larsson, Olof & Naurin, Daniel, 2016. "Judicial Independence and Political Uncertainty: How the Risk of Override Affects the Court of Justice of the EU," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 70(2), pages 377-408, April.
    25. Gareth Davies, 2016. "The European Union Legislature as an Agent of the European Court of Justice," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 846-861, July.
    26. Wessel Wijtvliet & Arthur Dyevre, 2021. "Judicial ideology in economic cases: Evidence from the General Court of the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(1), pages 25-45, March.
    27. Keith Krehbiel, 2007. "Supreme Court Appointments as a Move‐the‐Median Game," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(2), pages 231-240, April.
    28. Angela Huyue Zhang & Jingchen Liu & Nuno Garoupa, 2018. "Judging In Europe: Do Legal Traditions Matter?," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 144-178.
    29. Stein Arne Brekke & Daniel Naurin & Urška Šadl & Lucía López‐Zurita, 2023. "That's an Order! How the Quest for Efficiency Is Transforming Judicial Cooperation in Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 58-75, January.
    30. Marlene Wind, 2010. "The Nordics, the EU and the Reluctance Towards Supranational Judicial Review," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 1039-1063, September.
    31. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:1039-1063 is not listed on IDEAS
    32. Sheehan, Reginald S. & Mishler, William & Songer, Donald R., 1992. "Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 86(2), pages 464-471, June.
    33. Garrett, Geoffrey & Kelemen, R. Daniel & Schulz, Heiner, 1998. "The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(1), pages 149-176, January.
    34. Burley, Anne-Marie & Mattli, Walter, 1993. "Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 41-76, January.
    35. Sivaram Cheruvu, 2019. "How do institutional constraints affect judicial decision-making? The European Court of Justice’s French language mandate," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(4), pages 562-583, December.
    36. Carrubba, Clifford J. & Murrah, Lacey, 2005. "Legal Integration and Use of the Preliminary Ruling Process in the European Union," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(2), pages 399-418, April.
    37. Ferejohn, John A. & Weingast, Barry R., 1992. "A positive theory of statutory interpretation," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 263-279, June.
    38. Pavone, Tommaso & Stiansen, Øyvind, 2022. "The Shadow Effect of Courts: Judicial Review and the Politics of Preemptive Reform," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 116(1), pages 322-336, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas König & Stefan Eschenwecker, 2026. "The European Court of Justice and legal European integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 27(1), pages 32-59, March.
    2. Michal Ovádek, 2021. "Supranationalism, constrained? Locating the Court of Justice on the EU integration dimension," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(1), pages 46-69, March.
    3. Sivaram Cheruvu, 2025. "Are European Court of Justice judges biased towards their member states?," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 281-295, June.
    4. José Luis Castro-Montero & Edwin Alblas & Arthur Dyevre & Nicolas Lampach, 2018. "The Court of Justice and treaty revision: A case of strategic leniency?," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 570-596, December.
    5. Grimmel, Andreas, 2011. "Politics in robes? The European Court of Justice and the myth of judicial activism," Discussion Papers 2/11, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration.
    6. Andreas Grimmel, 2011. "Integration and the Context of Law: Why the European Court of Justice is not a Political Actor," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 3, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.
    7. Dederke, Julian, 2014. "Bahnliberalisierung in der Europäischen Union: Die Rolle des EuGH als politischer und politisch restringierter Akteur bei der Transformation staatsnaher Sektoren," PIPE - Papers on International Political Economy 20/2014, Free University Berlin, Center for International Political Economy, revised 2014.
    8. Lauren Peritz, 2018. "Obstructing integration: Domestic politics and the European Court of Justice," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(3), pages 427-457, September.
    9. Lucía López Zurita & Stein Arne Brekke, 2024. "A Spoonful of Sugar: Deference at the Court of Justice," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 1177-1203, September.
    10. Joshua C Fjelstul, 2019. "The evolution of European Union law: A new data set on the Acquis Communautaire," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(4), pages 670-691, December.
    11. Carsten Hefeker & Michael Neugart, 2016. "Policy deviations, uncertainty, and the European Court of Justice," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 547-567, December.
    12. Clifford J. Carrubba, 2003. "The European Court of Justice, Democracy, and Enlargement," European Union Politics, , vol. 4(1), pages 75-100, March.
    13. Keith Dowding, 2000. "Institutionalist Research on the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 1(1), pages 125-144, February.
    14. Mark A. Pollack, 2007. "The New Institutionalisms and European Integration," The Constitutionalism Web-Papers p0031, University of Hamburg, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science.
    15. Tridimas, George & Tridimas, Takis, 2004. "National courts and the European Court of Justice: a public choice analysis of the preliminary reference procedure," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 125-145, June.
    16. Denise Carolin Hübner, 2016. "The ‘National Decisions’ database (Dec.Nat): Introducing a database on national courts’ interactions with European Law," European Union Politics, , vol. 17(2), pages 324-339, June.
    17. Susanne K. Schmidt, 2000. "Only an Agenda Setter?," European Union Politics, , vol. 1(1), pages 37-61, February.
    18. Höpner, Martin & Schäfer, Armin, 2012. "Integration among unequals: How the heterogeneity of European varieties of capitalism shapes the social and democratic potential of the EU," MPIfG Discussion Paper 12/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    19. Wessel Wijtvliet & Arthur Dyevre, 2021. "Judicial ideology in economic cases: Evidence from the General Court of the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(1), pages 25-45, March.
    20. George Tridimas, 2004. "A Political Economy Perspective of Judicial Review in the European Union: Judicial Appointments Rule, Accessibility and Jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 99-116, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:27:y:2026:i:1:p:136-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.