IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v18y2008i2p85-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour Market Efficiency and Fairness: Agreements and the Independent Resolution of Difference

Author

Listed:
  • John Buchanan

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • John Buchanan, 2008. "Labour Market Efficiency and Fairness: Agreements and the Independent Resolution of Difference," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 18(2), pages 85-95, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:18:y:2008:i:2:p:85-95
    DOI: 10.1177/103530460801800211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/103530460801800211
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/103530460801800211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ron McCallum, 2008. "Australian Labour Law and the Rudd Vision: Some Observations," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 18(2), pages 23-31, May.
    2. Deakin, Simon & Wilkinson, Frank, 2005. "The Law of the Labour Market: Industrialization, Employment, and Legal Evolution," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198152811, Decembrie.
    3. Buchanan, J. & Watson, I. & Briggs, C. & Campbell, I., 2006. "Beyond Voodoo Economics and Backlash Social Policy: Where Next for Working Life Research and Policy," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 32(2), pages 183-201.
    4. Buchanan, John & van Wanrooy, Brigid & Oxenbridge, Sarah & Jakubauskas, Michelle, 2008. "Industrial Relations and Labour Market Reform - Time to build on Proven Legacies," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 9-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon DEAKIN & Jonas MALMBERG & Prabirjit SARKAR, 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970–2010," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 153(1), pages 1-27, March.
    2. repec:ilo:ilowps:403814 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Zoe Adams & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "'Wage', 'Salary' & 'Remuneration': A Genealogical Exploration of Juridical Terms & Their Significance for the Employer's Power to Make Deductions from Wages," Working Papers wp499, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    4. Antonio OJEDA AVILÉS, 2009. "The “externalization” of labour law," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 148(1-2), pages 47-67, June.
    5. Simon Deakin & Shelley Marshall & Sanjay Pinto, 2020. "Labour Laws, Informality, and Development: Comparing India and China," Working Papers wp518, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    6. Sheila C. Blackburn, 2009. "Curse or Cure? Why Was the Enactment of Britain's 1909 Trade Boards Act so Controversial?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(2), pages 214-239, June.
    7. Antonio ALOISI & Valerio DE STEFANO, 2020. "Regulation and the future of work: The employment relationship as an innovation facilitator," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 47-69, March.
    8. repec:ilo:ilowps:486240 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Toms, Steven & Fleischman, Richard K., 2015. "Accounting fundamentals and accounting change: Boulton & Watt and the Springfield Armory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-20.
    10. Zoe Adams & Simon Deakin, 2014. "Institutional Solutions to Precariousness and Inequality in Labour Markets," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(4), pages 779-809, December.
    11. Simon Deakin, 2013. "Addressing Labour Market Segmentation: The Role of Labour Law," Working Papers wp446, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    12. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2009. "Promoting Labour Market Efficiency and Fairness through a Legal Minimum Wage: The Webbs and the Social Cost of Labour," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(2), pages 306-326, June.
    13. Simon Deakin, 2016. "The Contribution of Labour Law to Economic Development & Growth," Working Papers wp478, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    14. Chen Ding & Deakin Simon, 2015. "On Heaven’s Lathe: State, Rule of Law, and Economic Development," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 123-145, June.
    15. Simon DEAKIN & Priya LELE & Mathias SIEMS, 2007. "The evolution of labour law: Calibrating and comparing regulatory regimes," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 146(3-4), pages 133-162, September.
    16. Didry, Claude, 2012. "Labour law as social questioning: The contribution of the "Labour Conventions Approach" to a different history of socioeconomic institutions," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 14(1), pages 11-19.
    17. Hupfel, Simon, 2022. "The Economists and The Combination Laws: A Reappraisal," SocArXiv uvfqa, Center for Open Science.
    18. Colm McLaughlin, 2009. "The Productivity‐Enhancing Impacts of the Minimum Wage: Lessons from Denmark and New Zealand," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(2), pages 327-348, June.
    19. Simon Deakin, 2017. "Tony Lawson’s Theory of the Corporation: Towards a Social Ontology of Law," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 41(5), pages 1505-1523.
    20. Wenjia ZHUANG & Kinglun NGOK, 2014. "Labour inspection in contemporary China: Like the Anglo-Saxon model, but different," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 153(4), pages 561-585, December.
    21. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2010. "The Theoretical Foundation of Industrial Relations and its Implications for Labor Economics and Human Resource Management," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 64(1), pages 74-108, October.
    22. Simon Deakin & Christopher Markou & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "The Law-Technology Cycle & the Future of Work," Working Papers wp504, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:18:y:2008:i:2:p:85-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.