IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v35y2014i2p245-266.html

The end of the normal working day? A study of change in Irish, Norwegian and Swedish banking

Author

Listed:
  • Heidi Nicolaisen

    (Fafo – Institute for Labour and Social Research, Norway)

Abstract

Since 1980 debates about the regulation of working time have been characterized by demands for flexibility and deregulation. This article looks at how the regulation of the normal working day has changed during the last 30 years and examines how these regulative changes interplay with new work practices. Based on theories on institutional change the article compares the development in working time regulations in the banking sector in three countries, Norway, Ireland and Sweden. Although the majority of the regulations remain intact, they have become considerably more flexible in all three countries. The normal working day is most weakened in Ireland, but it is also undermined in the two Nordic countries. New rules, practices and ideas result in more unsocial hours working, which increasingly remains uncompensated. These similarities across the countries are uncovered because of a research design that allows for examination of institutional change at a detailed level over a long period of time.

Suggested Citation

  • Heidi Nicolaisen, 2014. "The end of the normal working day? A study of change in Irish, Norwegian and Swedish banking," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 35(2), pages 245-266, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:35:y:2014:i:2:p:245-266
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X12475243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X12475243
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X12475243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franz Traxler, 2003. "Bargaining (De)centralization, Macroeconomic Performance and Control over the Employment Relationship," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 41(1), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Jill Rubery, 1998. "Working time in the UK," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 4(4), pages 657-677, November.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7182 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Hyman, Richard, 2001. "Trade union research and cross-national comparison," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 757, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. James Arrowsmith & Keith Sisson, 1999. "Pay and Working Time: Towards Organization-based Systems?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 37(1), pages 51-75, March.
    6. Chris Howell & Rebecca Kolins Givan, 2011. "Rethinking Institutions and Institutional Change in European Industrial Relations," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 49(2), pages 231-255, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Dufour & Adelheid Hege, 2013. "Special Issue. Edited by: Gregor Murray, Christian Lévesque, Christian Dufour and Adelheid Hege," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 355-372, July.
    2. repec:ces:ifodic:v:1:y:2003:i:2:p:14567948 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Snower, Dennis, 2025. "Labor Markets as Human Ecosystems: The Insider-Outsider Theory Reconsidered," INET Oxford Working Papers 2025-21, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    4. Jesús Ferreiro & Carmen Gómez, 2008. "Is Wages Policy on the Agenda of Trade Unions Again? Voluntary Wage Moderation in Spain," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 29(1), pages 64-95, February.
    5. Nicola Acocella & Giovanni Bartolomeo & Wilfried Pauwels, 2010. "Is there any scope for corporatism in macroeconomic policies?," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 37(4), pages 403-424, November.
    6. Sung Ho Park, 2013. "Capital openness, monetary integration, and wage-setting coordination in developed European countries," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 34(4), pages 637-666, November.
    7. Ulrike Weske & Peter Leisink & Eva Knies, 2014. "Local government austerity policies in the Netherlands: the effectiveness of social dialogue in preserving public service employment," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 403-416, August.
    8. Sukti DASGUPTA, 2002. "Attitudes towards trade unions in Bangladesh, Brazil, Hungary and Tanzania," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 141(4), pages 413-440, December.
    9. Bengt Furåker & Mattias Bengtsson, 2013. "Collective and individual benefits of trade unions: a multi-level analysis of 21 European countries," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5-6), pages 548-565, November.
    10. Schnabel, Claus & Zagelmeyer, Stefan & Kohaut, Susanne, 2005. "Collective bargaining structure and its determinants : an empirical analysis with British and German establishment data," IAB-Discussion Paper 200516, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    11. Franz Traxler & Bernd Brandl, 2012. "Collective Bargaining, Inter‐Sectoral Heterogeneity and Competitiveness: A Cross‐National Comparison of Macroeconomic Performance," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 73-98, March.
    12. Torsten Geelan, 2013. "Responses of trade union confederations to the youth employment crisis," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 19(3), pages 399-413, August.
    13. Rutvica Andrijasevic & Devi Sacchetto & Ngai Pun, 2020. "One firm, two countries, one workplace model? The case of Foxconn’s internationalisation," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(2), pages 262-278, June.
    14. FAIOLI, Michele, 2017. "The Quest For A New Generationof Labor Chapter In The Ttip," LawRxiv 6byw5, Center for Open Science.
    15. Peter Turnbull, 2022. "Slow, slow, quick, quick, slow: The ‘thick and thin’ of comparative (statactivist) research with a European trade union federation," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 28(4), pages 427-449, December.
    16. repec:clr:wugarc:y:2011:v:37i:4p:555 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Berthold, Norbert & Gründler, Klaus, 2011. "Nation size and unemployment," Discussion Paper Series 116, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    18. Ola Bergström & Alexander Styhre, 2022. "It takes change to remain the same: The transformation of Swedish government policy making in economic crises and the involvement of social partners," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(4), pages 1564-1587, November.
    19. Damian Grimshaw & Mat Johnson & Stefania Marino & Jill Rubery, 2017. "Towards more disorganised decentralisation? Collective bargaining in the public sector under pay restraint," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 22-41, January.
    20. Paul Marginson & Franz Traxler, 2005. "After enlargement: preconditions and prospects for bargaining coordination," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 11(3), pages 423-438, August.
    21. Prasnikar, Janez & Mikerevic, Dragan & Voje, Damjan, 2014. "Blockholding and organisational diversity: the case of a transition economy," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 19(3), pages 277-304.
    22. Eli Moen, 2017. "Weakening trade union power," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(4), pages 425-439, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:35:y:2014:i:2:p:245-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.