IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v40y2026i1p88-100.html

Lessons from Atlanta and Baltimore About Linking Economic and Community Development

Author

Listed:
  • Robert P. Stoker
  • Michael Rich
  • Eric Stokan

Abstract

This commentary describes selected revitalization initiatives in Atlanta, Georgia and Baltimore, Maryland to illustrate the challenges and opportunities local policy makers face when linking economic and community development. The authors draw on more than 30 years of observation and research. Fragmented power, complexity, conflict, mistrust, and resource scarcity make policy coordination a daunting challenge. The cities studied have faced these challenges by creating organizations and intermediary institutions to plan and execute local revitalizations initiatives with mixed success. The authors discuss the challenge of coordinating economic and community development (Ec&CD) policies and then compare the economic context of Atlanta and Baltimore and summarize several efforts to coordinate economic and community development policy making. The authors review the cases to discuss their commonalities and differences and conclude with advice for local leaders who hope to pursue a coordinated Ec&CD policy agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert P. Stoker & Michael Rich & Eric Stokan, 2026. "Lessons from Atlanta and Baltimore About Linking Economic and Community Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 40(1), pages 88-100, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:88-100
    DOI: 10.1177/08912424251388882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08912424251388882
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/08912424251388882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan H. Peters & Peter S. Fisher, 2002. "State Enterprise Zone Programs: Have They Worked?," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number sezp.
    2. Stone, Clarence N., 1980. "Systemic Power in Community Decision Making: A Restatement of Stratification Theory," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 74(4), pages 978-990, December.
    3. Laura Wolf-Powers, 2010. "Community Benefits Agreements and Local Government," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(2), pages 141-159, April.
    4. Edward (Ned) Hill, 2023. "What Is Economic Development? And What Is the Job of an Economic Development Professional?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(1), pages 34-48, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edward (Ned) Hill & Andrew J. Van Leuven, 2026. "In this Special Issue: Complementary Practices—Community, Workforce, and Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 40(1), pages 5-9, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirk E. Harris, 2015. "Because We Can Doesn’t Mean We Should and if We Do," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 29(3), pages 245-261, August.
    2. Matias Busso & Patrick Kline, 2008. "Do Local Economic Development Programs Work? Evidence from the Federal Empowerment Zone Program," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1639, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    3. Yung, Esther H.K. & Sun, Yi, 2020. "Power relationships and coalitions in urban renewal and heritage conservation: The Nga Tsin Wai Village in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Andy Hultquist & Tricia L. Petras, 2012. "An Examination of the Local Economic Impacts of Military Base Closures," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 26(2), pages 151-161, May.
    5. Givord, Pauline & Quantin, Simon & Trevien, Corentin, 2018. "A long-term evaluation of the first generation of French urban enterprise zones," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 149-161.
    6. James H. Spencer & Paul Ong, 2004. "An Analysis of the Los Angeles Revitalization Zone: Are Place-Based Investment Strategies Effective Under Moderate Economic Conditions?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 18(4), pages 368-383, November.
    7. Janina Jędrzejczak-Gas & Joanna Wyrwa & Anetta Barska, 2024. "Sustainable Energy Development and Sustainable Economic Development in EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Krupka, Douglas J. & Noonan, Douglas S., 2009. "Empowerment Zones, neighborhood change and owner-occupied housing," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 386-396, July.
    9. Anna Alberini, 2007. "Determinants And Effects On Property Values Of Participation In Voluntary Cleanup Programs: The Case Of Colorado," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 25(3), pages 415-432, July.
    10. Sumei Zhang, 2015. "Impacts of Enterprise Zone Policy on Industry Growth," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 29(4), pages 347-362, November.
    11. Alan Sage & Mike Langen & Alex van de Minne, 2023. "Where is the opportunity in opportunity zones?," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 51(2), pages 338-371, March.
    12. Anna Alberini & Dennis Guignet, 2008. "Voluntary Cleanups and Redevelopment Potential: Lessons from Baltimore, Maryland," Working Papers 2008.87, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    13. Mark Sandford, 2020. "Conceptualising ‘generative power’: Evidence from the city-regions of England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(10), pages 2098-2114, August.
    14. Timothy J. Bartik, 2007. "Solving the Problems of Economic Development Incentives," Book chapters authored by Upjohn Institute researchers, in: Ann Markusen (ed.), Reining in the Competition for Capital, chapter 5, pages 103-139, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    15. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5405 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Stephen Billings, 2009. "Do Enterprise Zones Work?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 37(1), pages 68-93, January.
    17. Laura Wolf-Powers, 2013. "Predictors of Employment Growth and Unemployment in U.S. Central Cities, 1990-2010," Upjohn Working Papers 13-199, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    18. Holstenkamp, Lars & Degenhart, Heinrich, 2013. "Bürgerbeteiligungsmodelle für erneuerbare Energien - Eine Begriffsbestimmung aus finanzwirtschaftlicher Perspektive [Citizen Participation Schemes for Renewable Energies - A Definition from a Financial Economics Point of View]," MPRA Paper 81263, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Timothy J. Bartik, 2003. "Local Economic Development Policies," Upjohn Working Papers 03-91, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    20. Madeline Streiff Buitelaar, 2019. "Cui Bono? Assessing Community Engagement in San Francisco Community Benefit Agreements," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, March.
    21. Timothy Bates, 2006. "Alleviating the lagging performance of economically depressed communities and regions," Proceedings: Community Affairs Dept. Conferences, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, issue Jul, pages 1-16.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:88-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.