IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v40y2026i1p88-100.html

Lessons from Atlanta and Baltimore About Linking Economic and Community Development

Author

Listed:
  • Robert P. Stoker
  • Michael Rich
  • Eric Stokan

Abstract

This commentary describes selected revitalization initiatives in Atlanta, Georgia and Baltimore, Maryland to illustrate the challenges and opportunities local policy makers face when linking economic and community development. The authors draw on more than 30 years of observation and research. Fragmented power, complexity, conflict, mistrust, and resource scarcity make policy coordination a daunting challenge. The cities studied have faced these challenges by creating organizations and intermediary institutions to plan and execute local revitalizations initiatives with mixed success. The authors discuss the challenge of coordinating economic and community development (Ec&CD) policies and then compare the economic context of Atlanta and Baltimore and summarize several efforts to coordinate economic and community development policy making. The authors review the cases to discuss their commonalities and differences and conclude with advice for local leaders who hope to pursue a coordinated Ec&CD policy agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert P. Stoker & Michael Rich & Eric Stokan, 2026. "Lessons from Atlanta and Baltimore About Linking Economic and Community Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 40(1), pages 88-100, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:88-100
    DOI: 10.1177/08912424251388882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08912424251388882
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/08912424251388882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:88-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.