IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v31y2017i3p183-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Emergence of Local Practices in a Devolved Workforce Investment System: Barriers and Possibilities for Enhancing Degree Completion

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Nisbet
  • Heather A. McKay
  • Sara Haviland

Abstract

Former President Obama’s 2020 Goal for the United States to have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world required that both new and disengaged college students attain degrees. The workforce development system could assist the latter by supporting credit-bearing education as training. Its ability to address this need depends on the controlled devolved structure established by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, which allows states and local workforce investment areas to set priorities and make a range of choices bounded by federal constraints. Analyzing interview data with frontline staff, case managers, and leadership in workforce systems in four states, the authors identify obstacles and opportunities for supporting degree completion. Three federal Workforce Investment Act mandates are particularly influential: individual training accounts, eligible training provider lists, and emphasis on demand occupations. The authors also model factors such as local partnerships and staff knowledge that can mediate how policy and practice shape local workforce investment area support for college.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Nisbet & Heather A. McKay & Sara Haviland, 2017. "The Emergence of Local Practices in a Devolved Workforce Investment System: Barriers and Possibilities for Enhancing Degree Completion," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 31(3), pages 183-195, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:31:y:2017:i:3:p:183-195
    DOI: 10.1177/0891242417719831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0891242417719831
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0891242417719831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bell, Stephen H. & Orr, Larry L., 2002. "Screening (and creaming?) applicants to job training programs: the AFDC homemaker-home health aide demonstrations," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 279-301, April.
    2. Joe Soss & Richard C. Fording & Sanford F. Schram, 2008. "The Color of Devolution: Race, Federalism, and the Politics of Social Control," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 536-553, July.
    3. repec:mpr:mprres:7217 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:mpr:mprres:7419 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:mpr:mprres:7141 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Paul T. Decker, 2011. "Ten Years of WIA Research," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 6f5198a0ebb6497ca878fe066, Mathematica Policy Research.
    7. Paul T. Decker & Jillian A. Berk, 2011. "Ten years of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA): Interpreting the research on WIA and related programs," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 906-926, September.
    8. Irma Perez-Johnson & Quinn Moore & Robert Santillano, "undated". "Improving the Effectiveness of Individual Training Accounts: Long-Term Findings from an Experimental Evaluation of Three Service Delivery Models," Mathematica Policy Research Reports ddb772ea2aa242a1a74579eb0, Mathematica Policy Research.
    9. Christopher T. King, 0. "Federalism and Workforce Policy Reform," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 29(2), pages 53-71.
    10. Paul T. Decker & Jillian A. Berk, "undated". "Ten Years of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA): Interpreting the Research on WIA and Related Programs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports aecf2c5c6f334999b46a7cda5, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burt S. Barnow & Jeffrey Smith, 2015. "Employment and Training Programs," NBER Chapters, in: Economics of Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the United States, Volume 2, pages 127-234, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Edwin Meléndez & Ramon Borges-Mendez & M. Anne Visser & Anna Rosofsky, 2015. "The Restructured Landscape of Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 29(2), pages 150-166, May.
    3. Adrian Fleissig, 2014. "Return on Investment from Training Programs and Intensive Services," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 42(1), pages 39-51, March.
    4. Carlos J. L. Balsas & Anthony Swingruber & Yen-Fu Lin, 2018. "Evaluating local workforce development programs in Upstate New York, USA," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(4), pages 349-366, June.
    5. Erin Todd Bronchetti & Melissa McInerney, 2017. "Does Increased Access to Health Insurance Impact Claims for Workers' Compensation? Evidence from Massachusetts Health Care Reform," Upjohn Working Papers 17-277, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    6. Marie T. Mora & Alberto Dávila & James Boudreau, 2016. "Social networks and Black–White differentials in public employment agency usage among mature job seekers," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 56(2), pages 433-448, March.
    7. Coleen K. Chrisinger, 2017. "Veterans in Workforce Development: Participation and Labor Market Outcomes," Upjohn Working Papers 17-274, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    8. Colleen K. Chrisinger, 2013. "Earnings Progression and the Workforce Investment Act: Evidence from Washington State," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 853-877, October.
    9. Peter Z. Schochet & Ronald D'Amico & Jillian Berk & Sarah Dolfin & Nathan Wozny, "undated". "Estimated Impacts for Participants in the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) Program Under the 2002 Amendments," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 582d8723f6884d4eb7a3f95a4, Mathematica Policy Research.
    10. Michael C Knaus & Michael Lechner & Anthony Strittmatter, 2021. "Machine learning estimation of heterogeneous causal effects: Empirical Monte Carlo evidence," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 24(1), pages 134-161.
    11. Marco Caliendo & Reinhard Hujer & Stephan Thomsen, 2008. "Identifying effect heterogeneity to improve the efficiency of job creation schemes in Germany," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(9), pages 1101-1122.
    12. Michael Rosholm & Jonas Staghøj & Michael Svarer, 2007. "A Statistical Programme Assignment Model," Economics Working Papers 2007-16, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    13. Sianesi, Barbara, 2017. "Evidence of randomisation bias in a large-scale social experiment: The case of ERA," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 41-64.
    14. Lechner, Michael & Smith, Jeffrey, 2007. "What is the value added by caseworkers?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 135-151, April.
    15. Bolhaar, Jonneke & Ketel, Nadine & van der Klaauw, Bas, 2020. "Caseworker's discretion and the effectiveness of welfare-to-work programs," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    16. Guillaume Blache, 2011. "Active labour market policies in Denmark: A comparative analysis of post-program effects," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 11071, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    17. Schmieder, Johannes F & Trenkle, Simon, 2020. "Disincentive effects of unemployment benefits and the role of caseworkers," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    18. Quinn Moore & Irma Perez-Johnson & Robert Santillano, 2018. "Decomposing Differences in Impacts on Survey- and Administrative-Measured Earnings From a Job Training Voucher Experiment," Evaluation Review, , vol. 42(5-6), pages 515-549, October.
    19. Stefanie Behncke & Markus Frölich & Michael Lechner, 2009. "Targeting Labour Market Programmes - Results from a Randomized Experiment," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 145(III), pages 221-268, September.
    20. Honorati, Maddalena & McArdle, Thomas P, 2013. "The nuts and bolts of designing and implementing training programs in developing countries," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 78980, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:31:y:2017:i:3:p:183-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.