IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

What Should EDA Fund? Developing a Model for Preassessment of Economic Development Investments

Listed author(s):
  • Brad R. Watts

    (W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI, USA,

  • George A. Erickcek

    (W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI, USA)

  • Jacob Duritsky

    (TeamNEO, Cleveland, OH, USA)

  • Kevin O'Brien

    (Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA)

  • Claudette Robey

    (Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA)

  • James Robey

    (TeamNEO, Cleveland, OH, USA)

Registered author(s):

    This article describes a comprehensive study of regionalism conducted by a joint team of economists and economic development specialists for the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA). The project consisted of two main activities: an examination of the factors associated with economic development success and the creation of a practical interactive tool for EDA project assessment and comparison. Findings from surveys, interviews, and project case studies are discussed in terms of their support for a positive relationship between successful economic development efforts and factors such as leadership and private investment. The authors also discuss the creation of a quantitative assessment model using well-known approaches such as economic impact multipliers and cluster theory. The primary contribution of this work to the existing body of EDAfocused research and evaluation literature is its introduction of a means of using standardized scores, also known as z -scores, to compare and assess economic development projects across both industries and regions.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by in its journal Economic Development Quarterly.

    Volume (Year): 25 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 1 (February)
    Pages: 65-78

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:25:y:2011:i:1:p:65-78
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:25:y:2011:i:1:p:65-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.