IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v623y2009i1p64-76.html

The Effects of Race/Ethnicity and National Origin on Length of Sentence in the United States Virgin Islands

Author

Listed:
  • Gale Iles

    (University of Tennessee, Chattanooga)

Abstract

Although researchers have acknowledged the importance of environmental and contextual factors in the judicial decision-making process, there is a lack of attention to sentencing decisions and outcomes in territorial courts of the United States. Drawing on the focal concerns perspective, this study analyzes the sentences of 583 federal defendants sentenced in the District Court of the United States Virgin Islands between 1997 and 2004. The findings reveal that net of legally relevant factors, Hispanics receive harsher sentences than blacks, and legal aliens receive prison sentences that are significantly longer than those received by U.S. citizens. However, the influence of legal alien status is driven by the harsher sentences imposed on defendants who are citizens of the Dominican Republic. The meaning and implications of the influence of citizenship status and race/ethnicity in a context where race/ethnicity are not overriding statuses, as they are on the U.S. mainland, are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gale Iles, 2009. "The Effects of Race/Ethnicity and National Origin on Length of Sentence in the United States Virgin Islands," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 623(1), pages 64-76, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:623:y:2009:i:1:p:64-76
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716208330705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716208330705
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716208330705?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mustard, David B, 2001. "Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(1), pages 285-314, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shamena Anwar & Patrick Bayer & Randi Hjalmarsson, 2012. "The Impact of Jury Race in Criminal Trials," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 127(2), pages 1017-1055.
    2. Eduardo Gandelman & Nestor Gandelman & Julie Rothschild, 2008. "Diferencias entre los sexos en los procedimientos judiciales: Pruebas de campo de causas de vivienda en Uruguay," Research Department Publications 3251, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    3. Vadim Volkov, 2016. "Legal and Extralegal Origins of Sentencing Disparities: Evidence from Russia's Criminal Courts," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 637-665, December.
    4. Shawn D. Bushway & Allison D. Redlich, 2012. "Is Plea Bargaining in the “Shadow of the Trial” a Mirage?," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 437-454, September.
    5. Bindler, Anna Louisa & Hjalmarsson, Randi & Machin, Stephen Jonathan & Rubio, Melissa, 2023. "Murphy's Law or luck of the Irish? Disparate treatment of the Irish in 19th century courts," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121339, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Andrew W. Nutting, 2013. "The Booker Decision And Discrimination In Federal Criminal Sentences," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 51(1), pages 637-652, January.
    7. Ryon, Stephanie Bontrager & Chiricos, Ted & Siennick, Sonja E. & Barrick, Kelle & Bales, William, 2017. "Sentencing in light of collateral consequences: Does age matter?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Stephanie Wallace & Brian Francis, 2025. "Developing a Complete Sentence Severity Scale using Extended Goodman RC models," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 75-102, March.
    9. Eren, Ozkan & Mocan, Naci, 2020. "Judge Peer Effects in the Courthouse," IZA Discussion Papers 13937, IZA Network @ LISER.
    10. Lochner, L., 1999. "Education, Work, and Crime: Theory and Evidence," RCER Working Papers 465, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
    11. Shawn D. Bushway & Emily G. Owens & Anne Morrison Piehl, 2012. "Sentencing Guidelines and Judicial Discretion: Quasi‐Experimental Evidence from Human Calculation Errors," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 291-319, June.
    12. Redner-Vera, Erica N., 2025. "Temporal analyses of American Indian disadvantage," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    13. Vickers, Chris, 2016. "Socioeconomic status and judicial disparities in England and Wales, 1870–1910," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 32-53.
    14. Simone Bertoli & Morgane Laouenan & Jérôme Valette, 2022. "Border Apprehensions and Federal Sentencing of Hispanic Citizens in the United States," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03818735, HAL.
    15. Chester L. Britt, 2009. "Modeling the Distribution of Sentence Length Decisions Under a Guidelines System: An Application of Quantile Regression Models," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 341-370, December.
    16. Sarah Marx Quintanar, 2011. "Do Driver Decisions in Traffic Court Motivate Police Discrimination in Issuing Speeding Tickets?," Departmental Working Papers 2011-13, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    17. Shana M. Judge & Jenna L. Dole, 2022. "Charging sex traffickers under federal law: What dispositions should we expect when applying theories on prosecutorial decision‐making?," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 677-715, September.
    18. Artūras Tereškinas & Rūta Vaičiūnienė & Liubovė Jarutienė, 2022. "Gender and Sentencing in Lithuania: More Mercy for Women?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, September.
    19. Max Schanzenbach, 2005. "Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District-Level Judicial Demographics," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(1), pages 57-92, January.
    20. Xia Wang & Daniel P. Mears, 2010. "A Multilevel Test of Minority Threat Effects on Sentencing," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 191-215, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:623:y:2009:i:1:p:64-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.