IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v101y2025ics0047235225001692.html

Temporal analyses of American Indian disadvantage

Author

Listed:
  • Redner-Vera, Erica N.

Abstract

Federal sentencing research examining disadvantages has mainly focused on Black and Latino defendants. More recently, attention has been given to how American Indians are treated and sentenced in the federal criminal justice system. However, additional research is needed to understand the nuances of American Indian disadvantage, particularly related to sentencing decisions over time. The current study examines sentencing decisions for years 1994 to 2012 using the focal concerns perspective. Data is analyzed using the U.S. Census and the Federal Justice Statistics Program Data Series. Theory, research, and policy implications are considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Redner-Vera, Erica N., 2025. "Temporal analyses of American Indian disadvantage," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001692
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001692
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102520?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolyn Liebler & Timothy Ortyl, 2014. "More Than One Million New American Indians in 2000: Who Are They?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(3), pages 1101-1130, June.
    2. Ojmarrh Mitchell, 2005. "A Meta-Analysis of Race and Sentencing Research: Explaining the Inconsistencies," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 439-466, December.
    3. Leiber, Michael J. & Johnson, Joseph & Fox, Kristan & Lacks, Robyn, 2007. "Differentiating among racial/ethnic groups and its implications for understanding juvenile justice decision making," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 471-484.
    4. Mustard, David B, 2001. "Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(1), pages 285-314, April.
    5. Mishler, William & Sheehan, Reginald S., 1993. "The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(1), pages 87-101, March.
    6. Alvarez, Alexander & Bachman, Ronet D., 1996. "American Indians and sentencing disparity: An Arizona test," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 549-561.
    7. Ronald S. Everett & Roger A. Wojtkiewicz, 2002. "Difference, Disparity, and Race/Ethnic Bias in Federal Sentencing," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 189-211, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xia Wang & Daniel P. Mears, 2010. "A Multilevel Test of Minority Threat Effects on Sentencing," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 191-215, June.
    2. Uhl, Andrzej & Mamak, Kamil, 2026. "Are sentencing disparities unavoidable? Lessons from centralized judicial training," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Bryan Holmes & Ben Feldmeyer, 2024. "Modeling Matters: Comparing the Presumptive Sentence Versus Base Offense Level Approaches for Estimating Racial/Ethnic Effects on Federal Sentencing," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 395-420, June.
    4. Bontrager Ryon, Stephanie, 2013. "Gender as social threat: A study of offender sex, situational factors, gender dynamics and social control," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 426-437.
    5. Nancy Nicosia & John M. MacDonald & Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, 2017. "Does Mandatory Diversion to Drug Treatment Eliminate Racial Disparities in the Incarceration of Drug Offenders? An Examination of California’s Proposition 36," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 179-205, March.
    6. Rhys Hester & Todd K. Hartman, 2017. "Conditional Race Disparities in Criminal Sentencing: A Test of the Liberation Hypothesis From a Non-Guidelines State," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 77-100, March.
    7. Cassia C. Spohn & Byungbae Kim & Steven Belenko & Pauline K. Brennan, 2014. "The Direct and Indirect Effects of Offender Drug Use on Federal Sentencing Outcomes," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 549-576, September.
    8. Shamena Anwar & Patrick Bayer & Randi Hjalmarsson, 2012. "The Impact of Jury Race in Criminal Trials," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 127(2), pages 1017-1055.
    9. Christoph Valentin Steinert, 2023. "The duration of political imprisonment: Evidence from China," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(4), pages 349-372, July.
    10. Eduardo Gandelman & Nestor Gandelman & Julie Rothschild, 2008. "Diferencias entre los sexos en los procedimientos judiciales: Pruebas de campo de causas de vivienda en Uruguay," Research Department Publications 3251, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    11. Vadim Volkov, 2016. "Legal and Extralegal Origins of Sentencing Disparities: Evidence from Russia's Criminal Courts," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 637-665, December.
    12. Jennifer Glick & Seung Han, 2015. "Socioeconomic Stratification from Within: Changes Within American Indian Cohorts in the United States: 1990–2010," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 34(1), pages 77-112, February.
    13. Shawn D. Bushway & Allison D. Redlich, 2012. "Is Plea Bargaining in the “Shadow of the Trial” a Mirage?," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 437-454, September.
    14. Bindler, Anna Louisa & Hjalmarsson, Randi & Machin, Stephen Jonathan & Rubio, Melissa, 2023. "Murphy's Law or luck of the Irish? Disparate treatment of the Irish in 19th century courts," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121339, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Andrew W. Nutting, 2013. "The Booker Decision And Discrimination In Federal Criminal Sentences," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 51(1), pages 637-652, January.
    16. Ryon, Stephanie Bontrager & Chiricos, Ted & Siennick, Sonja E. & Barrick, Kelle & Bales, William, 2017. "Sentencing in light of collateral consequences: Does age matter?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-11.
    17. Petersen, Kevin, 2025. "Is it all relative? Proposing the use of marginal effects for meta-analysis of binary outcomes in criminology and criminal justice," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Stephanie Wallace & Brian Francis, 2025. "Developing a Complete Sentence Severity Scale using Extended Goodman RC models," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 75-102, March.
    19. Tom S. Clark, 2009. "The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(4), pages 971-989, October.
    20. Eren, Ozkan & Mocan, Naci, 2020. "Judge Peer Effects in the Courthouse," IZA Discussion Papers 13937, IZA Network @ LISER.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.