IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Measured, Unmeasured, Mismeasured, and Unjustified Pessimism: A Review Essay of Thomas Piketty’s Capitalism in the Twenty First Century

Listed author(s):
  • McCloskey, Deirdre Nansen

    ()

    (University of Illinois at Chicago; Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany)

Registered author(s):

    Thomas Piketty has wrote a serious empirical work on economic history. The central thesis of the work is that the force of interest on inherited wealth causes inequality of the income earned from the wealth to increase in inevitable and stable manner. The author has collected and presented a huge bulk of empirical data. But despite all its advantages the book contains many serious flaws. In fact its own data suggest that the inequality of income has increased much only in a few countries and only recently. Moreover, all the way a steady share of rich people constantly have been dropping out of riches or coming into them, in evolutionary fashion. Piketty does not see the key role of entry of new entrepreneurs into the markets and their exit from them while this is the key to understanding of the process of market-tested betterment that has made the poor rich. Piketty’s definition of wealth does not include human capital, owned by the workers. The fundamental ethical problem in the book, is that Piketty has not reflected on the ethical relevance of equality as such and in comparison with raising of the poor. It is the latter notion that is ethically relevant from the point of view of their human dignity. If income is correctly measured the real income of the poor has risen in sustained way from 1800 because of rising productivity, and consumption of basic necessities is very much more equally enjoyed nowadays

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: ftp://w82.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1647.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration in its journal Economic Policy.

    Volume (Year): 4 (2016)
    Issue (Month): (August)
    Pages: 153-195

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1647
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    82, Vernadsky pr., 117571, Moscow

    Phone: +7 (499) 956 95 86
    Fax: (095) 564-85-80
    Web page: http://www.rane.ru/
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as
    in new window


    1. Alan Barreca & Karen Clay & Olivier Deschenes & Michael Greenstone & Joseph S. Shapiro, 2013. "Adapting to Climate Change: The Remarkable Decline in the U.S. Temperature-Mortality Relationship over the 20th Century," NBER Working Papers 18692, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Branko Milanovic & Peter H. Lindert & Jeffrey G. Williamson, 2011. "Pre‐Industrial Inequality," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(551), pages 255-272, March.
    3. William D. Nordhaus, 2004. "Schumpeterian Profits in the American Economy: Theory and Measurement," NBER Working Papers 10433, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. repec:sae:ecolab:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:205-218 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. A M. C Waterman, 2012. "Adam Smith and Malthus on high wages," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 409-429, June.
    6. Ian Gazeley & Andrew Newell, 2010. "The end of destitution: Evidence from British working households 1904-1937," Working Paper Series 0210, Department of Economics, University of Sussex.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RANEPA maintainer)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.