IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/lojare/0126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factores que inciden en el uso de transporte sustentable en Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Hugo Erazo

    (Departamento de Economía, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador)

  • Elisa Toledo

    (Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Carrera de Economía, Loja, Ecuador)

Abstract

La presente investigación analiza los determinantes del uso del transporte sustentable en el Ecuador en el año 2017. La metodología consiste en un modelo logit multinomial a una muestra de 24.606 individuos. Como variable dependiente se establece el modo de transporte, mientras que como variables independientes se utiliza variables que caracterizan socioeconómicamente al individuo como: edad, género, ingreso, nivel de instrucción, área y estado civil; y, variables que caracterizan el modo de transporte como: razón del uso de medio de transporte. Los resultados obtenidos permiten concluir que los principales factores para que un individuo utilice un medio movilidad sustentable son el área, sexo, jefatura del hogar, y, las razones de movilidad como la necesidad de trasladarse, seguridad, preocupación por el medio ambiente, salud, ahorro y cercanía. Nuestros hallazgos permiten evidenciar la necesidad de asegurar la accesibilidad a la movilidad urbana a un precio razonable y de calidad que reduzcan los tiempos de viaje y garanticen la comodidad con el objetivo de evitar el uso de los vehículos particulares.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugo Erazo & Elisa Toledo, 2023. "Factores que inciden en el uso de transporte sustentable en Ecuador," Revista Económica, Centro de Investigaciones Sociales y Económicas, Universidad Nacional de Loja, vol. 11(1), pages 9-15.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:lojare:0126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.unl.edu.ec/index.php/economica/article/view/1614
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gössling, Stefan & Choi, Andy S., 2015. "Transport transitions in Copenhagen: Comparing the cost of cars and bicycles," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 106-113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Conny Grunicke & Jan Christian Schluter & Jani-Pekka Jokinen, 2020. "Implementation of a cost-benefit analysis of Demand-Responsive Transport with a Multi-Agent Transport Simulation," Papers 2011.12869, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    2. Echeverría, Lucía & Giménez-Nadal, J. Ignacio & Alberto Molina, José, 2022. "Who uses green mobility? Exploring profiles in developed countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 247-265.
    3. Shibayama, Takeru & Laa, Barbara, 2024. "Sustainable Mobility Guarantee: Developing the concept from a transport planning perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 287-299.
    4. Xue, Mengtian & Zhang, Bin & Chen, Siyuan & Zhao, Yuandong & Wang, Zhaohua, 2024. "How does extreme temperature affect shared travel? Evidence from bike-sharing order flow in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Ralph Chapman & Michael Keall & Philippa Howden-Chapman & Mark Grams & Karen Witten & Edward Randal & Alistair Woodward, 2018. "A Cost Benefit Analysis of an Active Travel Intervention with Health and Carbon Emission Reduction Benefits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-10, May.
    6. José Alberto Molina & J. Ignacio Giménez-Nadal & Jorge Velilla, 2020. "Sustainable Commuting: Results from a Social Approach and International Evidence on Carpooling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-12, November.
    7. Echeverría, Lucía & Gimenez-Nadal, José Ignacio & Molina, José Alberto, 2021. "Carpooling: User Profiles and Well-being," IZA Discussion Papers 14736, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Kwiatkowski Michał Adam, 2018. "Urban Cycling as an Indicator of Socio-Economic Innovation and Sustainable Transport," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 37(4), pages 23-32, December.
    9. Bimala Sharma & Hae Kweun Nam & Wanglin Yan & Ha Yun Kim, 2019. "Barriers and Enabling Factors Affecting Satisfaction and Safety Perception with Use of Bicycle Roads in Seoul, South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-10, March.
    10. David Hearne & Erez Yerushalmi, 2025. "The Amenity Value of Bicycle Infrastructure: A Hedonic Application to Greater Manchester, UK," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(2), pages 425-457, February.
    11. Aldred, Rachel, 2016. "Cycling near misses: Their frequency, impact, and prevention," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 69-83.
    12. Iwińska, Katarzyna & Blicharska, Malgorzata & Pierotti, Livia & Tainio, Marko & de Nazelle, Audrey, 2018. "Cycling in Warsaw, Poland – Perceived enablers and barriers according to cyclists and non-cyclists," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 291-301.
    13. Kamila Turečková & Jan Nevima, 2020. "The Cost Benefit Analysis for the Concept of a Smart City: How to Measure the Efficiency of Smart Solutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Gössling, Stefan, 2016. "Urban transport justice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-9.
    15. AlSabbagh, Maha & Siu, Yim Ling & Guehnemann, Astrid & Barrett, John, 2017. "Integrated approach to the assessment of CO2e-mitigation measures for the road passenger transport sector in Bahrain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 203-215.
    16. Giovannipaolo Ferrari & Yingxin Tan & Paolo Diana & Maria Palazzo, 2024. "The Platformisation of Cycling—The Development of Bicycle-Sharing Systems in China: Innovation, Urban and Social Regeneration and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    17. Michał Adam Kwiatkowski & Daniela Szymańska, 2021. "Cycling policy in strategic documents of Polish cities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10357-10377, July.
    18. Suah Kim & Namjo Kim, 2020. "A Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Vehicle Restriction Policy for Reducing Overtourism in Udo, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Guillermo Mateu & Alberto Sanz, 2021. "Public Policies to Promote Sustainable Transports: Lessons from Valencia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Kearns, Michelle & Ledsham, Trudy & Savan, Beth & Scott, James, 2019. "Increasing cycling for transportation through mentorship programs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 34-45.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Transporte sustentable; Logit multinomial; Ecuador;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • R40 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:lojare:0126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristian Ortiz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceunlec.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.