IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ecoint/0643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From the Theory of Value to the Debate about Débouchés: A Comparison between Say and Malthus - Dalla teoria del valore al dibattito sugli sbocchi: un confronto fra Say e Malthus

Author

Listed:
  • Soliani, Riccardo

    (Università di Genova, Dipartimento di Economia e Metodi Quantitativi)

Abstract

Between J-B. Say and R. Malthus an important debate took place, witnessed by a number of letters and quotations, mainly concerning the débouchés problem. Quite surprisingly, the respective theories of values are never under discussion in their correspondence, nor quotations on them can be easily found in their works. In this paper we discuss how Say’s and Malthus’s theories, which are so close as long as the value’s theme is concerned, could lead to utterly opposite conclusions about the problem of débouchés. The roots of the remarkable difference between them is to be traced: first, in their respective vision of composition and evolution of demand stemming from the different social classes and, secondly, in a less explicit analytical divergency about the role played by demand in determining profits. Thus the contrast in the social vision of Say and Malthus, coupled with the difference in their analytical approach, can explain the puzzle of two authors whose theories of value were quite similar and expectations about the future landscape of capitalism were divergent. - Fra J-B. Say e R. Malthus ebbe luogo un importante dibattito, testimoniato da numerose lettere e citazioni, concernente soprattutto il problema degli sbocchi. Curiosamente, le rispettive teorie del valore non vengono mai discusse nella loro corrispondenza, né è agevole trovarle citate nei loro testi. In questo studio discutiamo come le teorie di Say e di Maltus, vicine per quanto riguarda il tema del valore, possano condurre a conclusioni del tutto opposte circa la questione degli sbocchi. Le radici della notevole differenza fra di essi si devono rintracciare: in primo luogo, nelle rispettive visioni della composizione ed evoluzione della domanda proveniente dalle diverse classi sociali, e, in secondo luogo, in una divergenza analitica meno evidente circa il ruolo svolto dalla domanda nella determinazione dei profitti. Così il contrasto nella visione sociale di Say e Malthus, insieme con la differenza nel loro approccio analitico, possono spiegare la circostanza di due autori le cui teorie del valore sono piuttosto simili e le aspettative sul futuro assetto del capitalismo sono divergenti.

Suggested Citation

  • Soliani, Riccardo, 2012. "From the Theory of Value to the Debate about Débouchés: A Comparison between Say and Malthus - Dalla teoria del valore al dibattito sugli sbocchi: un confronto fra Say e Malthus," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 65(1), pages 149-171.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iei1946.it/RePEc/ccg/SOLIANI%20149_171.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evelyn Forget, 1993. "J.-B. Say and Adam Smith: An Essay in the Transmission of Ideas," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 121-133, February.
    2. Garegnani, Pierangelo, 1984. "Piero Sraffa," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 1-2, March.
    3. Costabile, Lilia & Rowthorn, Bob, 1985. "Malthus's Theory of Wages and Growth," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 95(378), pages 418-437, June.
    4. Richard Arena, 1979. "Note sur la conception classique de la concurrence," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 5(1), pages 119-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pier Luigi Porta, 2013. "What remains of Sraffa's economics," Working Papers 242, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised May 2013.
    2. Sydney Afriat, 2006. "Sraffa's Prices," Department of Economics University of Siena 474, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    3. José Felix Catano, 1996. "¿Un defecto en la mercancía patrón de Sraffa?," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, June.
    4. Neri Salvadori & Rodolfo Signorino, 2013. "The Classical Notion of Competition Revisited," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 149-175, Spring.
    5. Lee, Maw Lin & Loschky, David, 1987. "Malthusian Population Oscillations," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 97(387), pages 727-739, September.
    6. Fabio Ravagnani, 2008. "Classical Theory and Exhaustible Natural Resources: Notes on the Current Debate," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 79-93.
    7. Rowthorn, Robert & Guzmán, Ricardo Andrés & Rodríguez-Sickert, Carlos, 2008. "The economics of early social stratification," MPRA Paper 10115, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Levrero, Enrico Sergio, 2009. "Marx on absolute and relative wages," MPRA Paper 20976, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Fabio Ravagnani, 2001. "Notes on a Mischaracterization of the Classical Theory of Value," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 355-363.
    10. Menudo, Jose M., 2011. "Market Stability in Adam Smith: Competitive Process and Institutions," MPRA Paper 15361, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Marek Loužek, 2014. "Populační teorie Thomase Malthuse," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(1), pages 1-19.
    12. Frederic Lee & Tae-Hee Jo, 2011. "Social Surplus Approach and Heterodox Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 857-876.
    13. Fabio Ravagnani, 2007. "The classical theory of normal price and the analysis of economic Changes: A comment on D'Orlando," Working Papers in Public Economics 104, Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Roma.
    14. Martin, Catherine, 2003. "Une ambiguïté de la relation entre Keynes et Malthus : Rejet de la loi de Say, monnaie et rapport salarial," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 79(1), pages 117-132, Mars-Juin.
    15. Waterman, A M C, 1992. "Analysis and Ideology in Malthus's Essay on Population," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(58), pages 203-217, June.
    16. Cavalieri, Duccio, 2001. "On Some Controversial Aspects of Sraffa's Theoretical System in the Second Half of the 1920s," MPRA Paper 43737, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Enrico Sergio Levrero, 1999. "Worker Bargaining Power and Real Wages from 1870 to 1913: Phelps Brown reconsidered," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 183-203.
    18. Canning, David J, 1988. "Increasing Returns in Industry and the Role of Agriculture in Growth," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 40(3), pages 463-476, September.
    19. Michel Rosier, 1992. "Déviations temporaires et permanentes des prix de marché dans la richesse des nations," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 20(1), pages 231-258.
    20. Reiner Franke, 1987. "Les forces accidentelles dans un processus smithien de gravitation : une saisie par un modèle probabiliste," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 13(1), pages 73-89.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Classical Political Economy; Theory of Value and Distribution; Malthus; Thomas Robert; Say; Jean-Baptiste;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Procopio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cacogit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.