Los límites de la eficiencia económica en una sociedad democrática
During the 20th century, Marxism and non-egalitarian or classical liberalism debated the properties of economic reasoning, that is, the way economic institutions value multiple ends. This debate produced an implicit consensus between market socialists and non-egalitarian liberals about democracy. In this consensus, the Rousseau’s general will was replaced by the individual will, and popular sovereignty reflected in consumer sovereignty. This essay uses a Rawlsian perspective to analyze the limits of economic efficiency in a democratic society.
Volume (Year): 9 (2007)
Issue (Month): 16 (January-June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Cra. 1 No. 12-68 Casa de las Mandolinas|
Phone: (571) 2826066 Ext. 1307
Fax: (571) 2826066 Ext. 1304
Web page: http://www.economiainstitucional.com
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Vaughn, Karen I, 1980. "Economic Calculation under Socialism: The Austrian Contribution," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(4), pages 535-554, October.
- Pranab Bardhan & John E. Roemer, 1992.
"Market Socialism: A Case for Rejuvenation,"
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 101-116, Summer.
- Pranab Bardhan and John E. Roemer., 1991. "Market Socialism: A Case for Rejuvenation," Economics Working Papers 91-175, University of California at Berkeley.
- A. P. Lerner, 1936. "A Note on Socialist Economics," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 72-76.
- A. P. Lerner, 1935. "Economic Theory and Socialist Economy: A Rejoinder," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 152-154.
- Johansson, Sten, 2001. "Conceptualizing and Measuring Quality of Life for National Policy," Working Paper Series 171, Trade Union Institute for Economic Research.
- Frank H. Knight, 1946. "Freedom Under Planning," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54, pages 451-451.
- Milton Friedman & L. J. Savage, 1952. "The Expected-Utility Hypothesis and the Measurability of Utility," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 60, pages 463-463.
- Frank H. Knight, 1950. "Economic and Social Policy in Democratic Society," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58, pages 513-513.
- Dimitris Milonakis, 2003. "New market socialism: a case for rejuvenation or inspired alchemy?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 97-121, January.
- Cooter, Robert & Rappoport, Peter, 1984. "Were the Ordinalists Wrong about Welfare Economics?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 507-530, June. Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rei:ecoins:v:9:y:2007:i:16:p:89-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Paola Rodríguez)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.