IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/restud/v4y1936i1p72-76..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Note on Socialist Economics

Author

Listed:
  • A. P. Lerner

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • A. P. Lerner, 1936. "A Note on Socialist Economics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 72-76.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:4:y:1936:i:1:p:72-76.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2967661
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jael, Paul, 2015. "Socialist Calculation and Market Socialism," MPRA Paper 64255, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Bonnisseau Jean-Marc & Jamin Alexandrine, 2011. "The Survival Assumption in Intertemporal Economies," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Peter Zweifel & H. E. Frech, 2016. "Why ‘Optimal’ Payment for Healthcare Providers Can Never be Optimal Under Community Rating," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 9-20, February.
    4. Lopes, Tiago Camarinha, 2022. "Humans, technology and control: An essay based on the metalanguage of economic calculation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 631-642.
    5. Fišer, Drago & Kyn, Oldrich, 1967. "Mnohaletá Mezinárodní Diskuse O Socialismu A Trhu," MPRA Paper 26, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Garrett R. Wood, 2023. "Assumed military solutions to central economic planning problems: evidence from soviet military journals," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(3), pages 383-401, September.
    7. Jacques Sapir, 2022. "Is Economic Planning Our Future?," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 583-597, December.
    8. Jean-Marc Bonnisseau & Alexandrine Jamin, 2004. "General equilibrium theory and increasing returns: an alternative to the survival assumption," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b04017, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    9. Boettke, Peter J. & Candela, Rosolino A., 2023. "On the feasibility of technosocialism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 44-54.
    10. Duranton, Gilles & Haniotis, Toni, 2004. "A comparison between economic systems with an application to transition," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(9-10), pages 2125-2157, August.
    11. Samuelson, Paul, 1995. "Some uneasiness with the Coase Theorem," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, May.
    12. Hubert Gabrisch, 2020. "Elements, origins and future of Great Transformations: Eastern Europe and global capitalism," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(2), pages 172-190, June.
    13. Alejandro Agafonow, 2007. "Los límites de la eficiencia económica en una sociedad democrática," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 9(16), pages 89-119, January-J.
    14. Mario A. González-Corzo, 2018. "Principal Elements of Agricultural Reforms in Transition Economies: Implications For Cuba?," Annual Proceedings, The Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy, vol. 28.
    15. Jael, Paul, 2018. "Calcul socialiste et socialisme de marché [Socialist Calculation and Market Socialism]," MPRA Paper 89521, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Bakonyi, Zoltán, 2015. "Centralizáció - utolsó mentsvár vagy a bukás előszele?. A tervezés általános természetéről [Centralization: last chance or a foreshadowing of collapse?. On the general nature of planning]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 305-328.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:4:y:1936:i:1:p:72-76.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/restud .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.