IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v11y2022i7p385-392.html

The strategy of health insurance-bpjs in efforts to increase jkn-kis participation in business entity on the segment of workers receiving wage

Author

Listed:
  • Debi Indah Permatasari

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Ring road Condong Catur Depok, 55283 Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

  • Dessy Isfianadewi

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Ring road Condong Catur Depok, 55283 Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

The system implemented by the Health Social Security Administering Agency (BPJS) Samarinda is to carry out the Socialization program of the National Health Insurance for Healthy Indonesia Card (JKN-KIS) program to the Business Entity Wage Recipient Workers segment, the program to increase membership by conducting Telemarketing, Mapping, Canvasing, O.S.X. & O.S.S., and synergizing with the relevant District Attorney providing administrative sanctions based on Presidential Regulation number 86 the year 2013. This study aims to identify obstacles and strategies implemented by Health Insurance-BPJS Samarinda to increase membership in the Business Entity Wage Recipient Workers segment. The method used in this study is a qualitative approach by analyzing the data descriptively. Data collection techniques were by conducting observations, interviews, and questionnaires to business entities in the city of Samarinda; as many as 60 respondents were to find out that the business entity had registered its workers in the J.K.N.'s program. This study found obstacles such as a lack of awareness of health insurance, workers registered in the non-wage and unemployees, high turnover of workers, and administrative sanctions that have not been implemented according to the applicable law. Key Words:J.K.N., Obstacles, Strategies, Membership Improvement, Wage Recipient Workers Segments

Suggested Citation

  • Debi Indah Permatasari & Dessy Isfianadewi, 2022. "The strategy of health insurance-bpjs in efforts to increase jkn-kis participation in business entity on the segment of workers receiving wage," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(7), pages 385-392, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:385-392
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i7.2049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/2049/1504
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i7.2049
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i7.2049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kairies-Schwarz, Nadja & Kokot, Johanna & Vomhof, Markus & Weßling, Jens, 2017. "Health insurance choice and risk preferences under cumulative prospect theory – an experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 374-397.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wettstein, Dominik J. & Boes, Stefan, 2022. "How value-based policy interventions influence price negotiations for new medicines: An experimental approach and initial evidence," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 112-121.
    2. Ana Cecilia Quiroga Gutierrez & Stefan Boes, 2024. "Bridging the gap: Experimental evidence on information provision and health insurance choices," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 1368-1386, June.
    3. Huong Trang Kim & Quang Nguyen, 2024. "Linking top managers’ behavioural traits with business practices and firm performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(11), pages 3253-3296, November.
    4. Ding, Yihong & Robinson, Elizabeth & Balcombe, Kelvin, 2025. "The role of experience in climate adaptation: Evidence from a field experiment in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PB).
    5. Yunfan Wu & Keita Kinoshita & Yi Zhang & Rena Kagami & Shintaro Sato, 2022. "Influence of COVID-19 Crisis on Motivation and Hiking Intention of Gen Z in China: Perceived Risk and Coping Appraisal as Moderators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Stefan A. Lipman & Arthur E. Attema, 2019. "Rabin's paradox for health outcomes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(8), pages 1064-1071, August.
    7. Crainich, David & Goldzahl, Léontine & Jusot, Florence & Mignon, Doriane, 2025. "Explaining the long-term care insurance puzzle: The role of preferences for correlation and for quality of life over wealth," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Hermanns, Benedicta & Kairies-Schwarz, Nadja & Kokot, Johanna & Vomhof, Markus, 2023. "Heterogeneity in health insurance choice: An experimental investigation of consumer choice and feature preferences," hche Research Papers 29, University of Hamburg, Hamburg Center for Health Economics (hche).
    9. Angerer, Silvia & Glätzle-Rützler, Daniela & Waibel, Christian, 2023. "Framing and subject pool effects in healthcare credence goods," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Fey, Jan-Christian & Schmeiser, Hato & Schreiber, Florian, 2024. "Optimal insurance deductibles under limited information," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 202-221.
    11. Maren Baars & Michael Goedde‐Menke, 2022. "Ignorance illusion in decisions under risk: The impact of perceived expertise on probability weighting," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(1), pages 35-62, March.
    12. Leon Li & Nen-Chen Richard Hwang, 2017. "Prospect Theory and Earnings Manipulation: Examination of the Non-Uniform Relationship between Earnings Manipulation and Stock Returns Using Quantile Regression," Working Papers in Economics 17/25, University of Waikato.
    13. Jeannette Brosig‐Koch & Burkhard Hehenkamp & Johanna Kokot, 2023. "Who benefits from quality competition in health care? A theory and a laboratory experiment on the relevance of patient characteristics," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(8), pages 1785-1817, August.
    14. Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Hajiheydari, Nastaran, 2020. "On-demand service platforms pro/anti adoption cognition: Examining the context-specific reasons," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 180-194.
    15. Herrmann, Oliver & Jong-A-Pin, Richard & Schoonbeek, Lambert, 2019. "A prospect-theory model of voter turnout," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 362-373.
    16. Quiroga Gutierrez, Ana Cecilia, 2024. "Picture this: Making health insurance choices easier for those who need it," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    17. Silvia Angerer & Daniela Glätzle-Rützler & Christian Waibel, 2021. "Trust in health care credence goods: Experimental evidence on framing and subject pool effects," Working Papers 2021-13, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    18. Finocchiaro Castro, Massimo & Guccio, Calogero & Romeo, Domenica, 2022. "A systematic literature review of 10 years of behavioral research on health services," EconStor Preprints 266248, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    19. Raquel J. Fonseca & Luísa Cunha, 2020. "A net present value approach to health insurance choice," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 709-724, December.
    20. Silvia Angerer & Daniela Glätzle‐Rützler & Christian Waibel, 2021. "Monitoring institutions in healthcare markets: Experimental evidence," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 951-971, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:385-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.