IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v6y2012i1p175-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Concerning View In The Liquidity Crisis Through The Game Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Larisa Țâmpu

    () (ASE Bucharest, DSCQM, Doctoral School in Business Administration, Bucharest –Romania)

  • Carmen Costea

    () (ASE Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide a substantiating view on the crises started in 2007 and of which consequences transcended around the world recession. The paper is, essentially, based on a static game theory managing the limits of classic finance theory to provide satisfactory explanations of different financial events. Our intention was to analyze two cases of application of the game theory in the financial intermediation, with impact on the crisis. The proposed games correspond to deposits and loans. The end of the game managed to the idea that balance is reached only when the players (both deponent and borrower) will withdraw money from the bank together. This will have a major impact on the bank resources. The approach path manages to the idea that new considerations may come near the current crises through the game theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Larisa Țâmpu & Carmen Costea, 2012. "A Concerning View In The Liquidity Crisis Through The Game Theory," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 6(1), pages 175-184, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:175-184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/jisomg/SP12/JISOM-SP12-A16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franklin Allen & Stephen Morris, 1998. "Finance Applications of Game Theory," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 98-23, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    2. Stiglitz, Joseph E & Weiss, Andrew, 1981. "Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, pages 393-410.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:175-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alex Tabusca). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/firauro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.