IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison Of The Profitability Of Top 1000 Firms In Canada And Usa


  • Shah SAUD

    () (Lakehead University, Canada)

  • Waqar BADSHAH

    () (Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Istanbul, Turkey)


This study examines large Canadian and US firms to decompose the variation of firm profitability into year, industry, year-industry and firm components. Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Sales (ROS) provide three measures of firm profitability. For all three measures and both countries, firm effects provide the biggest contribution to the variability in firm profits with year-industry effects second, year effects third, and industry effects last. These results match those of previous studies. Comparing Canadian and US firms, firm effects explain more of the variation in the profitability of Canadian firms. Finally, the combination of industry, year and firm factors explain more the overall variation in profitability of our sample of Canadian firms than our sample of US firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Shah SAUD & Waqar BADSHAH, 2016. "Comparison Of The Profitability Of Top 1000 Firms In Canada And Usa," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 15(1), pages 16-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2016:i:1:p:16-32

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Schmalensee, Richard, 1985. "Do Markets Differ Much?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 341-351, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Return on Equity (ROE); Return on Asset (ROA); Return on Sale (ROS).;

    JEL classification:

    • F65 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Finance
    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2016:i:1:p:16-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Logica Banica). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.