IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Contrats agraires ou conventions agraires ?

  • Jean-Philippe Colin
Registered author(s):

    [fre] Alors que l'économie des contrats agraires s'inscrit dans le paradigme contractualiste, cet article propose de conceptualiser les contrats agraires comme des arrangements institutionnels « composites », aux dimensions contractuelle, conventionnelle et réglementaire, ce qui n'est pas sans implications théoriques (recours à un certain éclectisme) et méthodologiques (légitimation d'une démarche comprehensive). Une attention plus particulière est portée à la dimension conventionnelle des contrats agraires, illustrée au travers du contrat de métayage dans le contexte mexicain. [eng] Whereas the economics of agrarian contracts is rooted in the contractual paradigm, this paper offer a conceptualization of agrarian contracts as «composite» institutional arrangements, with contractual, conventional and regulatory dimensions. The theoretical and methodological implications of this conceptualization are explored. The paper focuses more specifically on the conventional dimension of agrarian contracts, with the illustration of sharecropping arrangements in Mexico.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Économie rurale.

    Volume (Year): 272 (2002)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 57-73

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2002_num_272_1_5357
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecoru.2002.5357
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Eric Brousseau & Jean-Michel Glachant, 2000. "Introduction : Économie des contrats et renouvellements de l'analyse économique," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 92(1), pages 23-50.
    2. Jacques Ghestin, 2000. "Le contrat en tant qu'échange économique," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 92(1), pages 81-100.
    3. J. -P. Dupuy & F. Eymard-Duvernay & O. Favereau & A. Orléan & R. Salais & L. Thévenot, 1989. "Introduction," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(2), pages 141-146.
    4. Scott E. Masten & Stéphane Saussier, 2000. "Econometrics of Contracts : an Assessment of Developments in the Empirical Literature on Contracting," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 92(1), pages 215-236.
    5. Smith, Vernon L, 1989. "Theory, Experiment and Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 151-69, Winter.
    6. Masahiko Aoki, 1998. "The Subjective Game Form and Institutional Evolution as Punctuated Equilibrium," Working Papers 98011, Stanford University, Department of Economics.
    7. Williamson, Oliver E, 1988. "The Logic of Economic Organization," Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 65-93, Spring.
    8. Siddhartha Dasgupta & Thomas O. Knight & H. Alan Love, 1999. "Evolution of Agricultural Land Leasing Models: A Survey of the Literature," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 148-176.
    9. Nabli, Mustapha K. & Nugent, Jeffrey B., 1989. "The New Institutional Economics and its applicability to development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 17(9), pages 1333-1347, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2002_num_272_1_5357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.