IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Pacte de stabilité, crédibilité et stabilisation dans l'union monétaire européenne

  • Dominique Bureau
Registered author(s):

    [eng] The Growth and Stability Pact: Stabilisation, Credibility and the EMU Fiscal Criteria . by Dominique Bureau . The monetary credibility versus regional stabilisation dilemma that underlies discussions about EMU fiscal criteria can be illustrated using a simple model, in which opting for an independent European Central Bank is assumed to solve monetary credibility problems, but the Member States are also assumed to maintain a strong capacity for fiscal stabilisation to cope with demand shocks. . We show how, in this context, the trade-off between anti-inflation credibility and stabilisation after asymmetric shocks is a delicate issue, since the central bank does not have a simple means of curbing fiscal authorities' expansionary bias. As monetary policy is a public good in a certain way, national governments should free ride on it. Our model does not highlight the intrinsic externalities between the Member States' fiscal policies through imports or interest rates. Instead it puts the accent on the externality arising from a single monetary policy. This means we can regard the introduction of mechanisms, such as those called for in the Growth and Stability Pact, as an additional instrument aimed at alleviating the credibility/stabilisation dilemma. This would enable fiscal authorities to remain autonomous, but make them accountable, as long as sanctions are perceived as being relatively automatic. [fre] Pacte de stabilité, crédibilité et stabilisation dans l'Union monétaire européenne . par Dominique Bureau . Le dilemme entre crédibilité monétaire et stabilisation régionale sous jacent au débat sur les critères budgétaires de l'UEM peut être illustré dans le cadre d'un modèle simple, où le choix d'une banque centrale européenne indépendante est supposé résoudre les problèmes de crédibilité monétaire, mais où les États-membres sont supposés conserver une forte capacité de stabilisation budgétaire face à des chocs de demande. . On montre que dans un tel contexte, l'arbitrage entre la crédibilité anti-inflationniste et la stabilisation des chocs asymétriques est délicat, la banque centrale ne pouvant discipliner simplement le biais expansionniste des autorités budgétaires. La politique monétaire constituant d'une certaine manière un bien public, les autorités nationales ont intérêt à se comporter vis- à- vis de celle-ci en passager clandestin. Dans le modèle considéré, qui met donc au premier plan, non pas les externalités intrinsèques, par les importations ou le taux d'intérêt, entre politiques budgétaires des États-membres, mais celle résultant de l'unicité de la politique monétaire, la mise en place de mécanismes tels que ceux envisagés dans le Pacte de stabilité peut alors être vu comme un instrument complémentaire, visant à alléger ce dilemme crédibilité et stabilisation. Permettant de maintenir l'autonomie des autorités budgétaires, il les responsabiliserait cependant si les sanctions sont perçues comme relativement automatiques.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.3406/ecop.1998.5897
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.persee.fr/articleAsPDF/ecop_0249-4744_1998_num_132_1_5897/ecop_0249-4744_1998_num_132_1_5897.pdf?mode=light
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Économie & prévision.

    Volume (Year): 132 (1998)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 49-57

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1998_num_132_1_5897
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1998.5897
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/revue/ecop

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Artis, Michael J & Winkler, Bernhard, 1997. "The Stability Pact: Safeguarding the Credibility of the European Central Bank," CEPR Discussion Papers 1688, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. repec:imf:imfpdp:9607 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Beetsma, R.M.W.J. & Bovenberg, A.L., 1995. "Does Monetary Unification Lead to Excessive Debt Accumulation?," DELTA Working Papers 95-23, DELTA (Ecole normale supérieure).
    4. Walsh, Carl E, 1995. "Optimal Contracts for Central Bankers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(1), pages 150-67, March.
    5. Barry Eichengreen & Charles Wyplosz, 1998. "The Stability Pact: more than a minor nuisance?," Economic Policy, CEPR;CES;MSH, vol. 13(26), pages 65-113, 04.
    6. Bennett T. McCallum, 1995. "Two Fallacies Concerning Central Bank Independence," NBER Working Papers 5075, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Rogoff, Kenneth, 1985. "The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Monetary Target," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 100(4), pages 1169-89, November.
    8. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 1996. "Federal Fiscal Constitutions: Risk Sharing and Moral Hazard," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 623-46, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1998_num_132_1_5897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.