IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partage explicite ou implicite du profit dans la détermination des salaires


  • Sandeep Bhargava
  • Tim Jenkinson


[eng] Explicit Versus Implicit Profit Sharing and the Determination of Wages by Sandeep Bhargava and Tim Jenkinson . This paper considers the claim that explicit profit sharing reduces the marginal cost of labour. This is contrasted with the view that implicit profit sharing occurs through wage bargaining. Using a microeconomic data set from the U.K. we find no evidence that the introduction of profit sharing reduces base wages and, hence, the marginal cost of labour. However, firm profitability is found to have a positive effect on wages, which supports the hypothesis of implicite profit sharing through wage bargaining. These findings suggest that it is hard to justify the favourable tax treatment of profit-related pay found in the U.K. [fre] Partage explicite du profit ou partage implicite du profit dans la détermination des salaires . par Sandeep Bhargava et Tim Jenkinson . L'objet de cet article est de s'interroger sur l'affirmation stipulant que le partage explicite du profit réduit le coût marginal du travail. Cette vue se différencie de celle qui considère que le partage implicite du profit peut résulter des négociations salariales. En utilisant des données micro-économiques sur le Royaume-Uni, nous ne trouvons pas de confirmation que l'introduction d'un mécanisme de partage du profit conduit à une baisse du salaire, et donc à une diminution du coût marginal du travail. Cependant, la profitabilité des entreprises semble avoir un effet positif sur les salaires, ce qui tendrait à confirmer l'hypothèse d'un partage implicite du profit à travers les négociations salariales. Ces résultats suggèrent qu'il y a peu de justification aux avantages fiscaux accordés au système d'intéressement des salariés au profit de l'entreprise que l'on observe au Royaume-Uni.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandeep Bhargava & Tim Jenkinson, 1996. "Partage explicite ou implicite du profit dans la détermination des salaires," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 126(5), pages 19-29.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1996_num_126_5_5820
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1996.5820

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Nickell, Stephen J & Wadhwani, Sushil, 1990. "Insider Forces and Wage Determination," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 100(401), pages 496-509, June.
    2. Wadhwani, Sushil & Wall, Martin, 1990. "The Effects of Profit-Sharing on Employment, Wages, Stock Returns and Productivity: Evidence from UK Micro-data," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 100(399), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Anderson, T. W. & Hsiao, Cheng, 1982. "Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 47-82, January.
    4. Weitzman, Martin L, 1987. "Steady State Unemployment under Profit Sharing," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 97(385), pages 86-105, March.
    5. Wadhwani, Sushil B, 1987. "The Effects of Inflation and Real Wages on Employment," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 54(213), pages 21-40, February.
    6. Hoel, Michael & Moene, Karl O, 1988. " Profit Sharing, Unions and Investments," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(4), pages 493-505.
    7. Cable, John & Wilson, Nicholas, 1989. "Profit-Sharing and Productivity: An Analysis of UK Engineering Firms," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(396), pages 366-375, June.
    8. Nickell, Stephen J, 1981. "Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(6), pages 1417-1426, November.
    9. FitzRoy, Felix R & Kraft, Kornelius, 1992. "Forms of Profit Sharing and Firm Performance: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Problems," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 209-225.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1996_num_126_5_5820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.