IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pstr00/0000235.html

Relational aspects and care-based support in Zero-Deforestation Commitments

Author

Listed:
  • Adelina Chandra
  • Janina Grabs
  • Eva-Marie Meemken
  • Rachael D Garrett

Abstract

A rising number of companies have made zero-deforestation commitments (ZDCs) to decouple deforestation from their supply chains, encapsulated in No Deforestation, No Peat, and No Exploitation (NDPE) commitments. These interventions are designed by powerful downstream supply chain actors, typically without the involvement of the upstream-level non-industrial producers who are affected both directly and indirectly. This study draws on bottom-up perspectives from oil palm smallholders, cooperatives, and other local stakeholders in Indonesia to explore the state of company-community relationships and the implementation and expectations of corporate ZDCs. Through an analysis of 28 focus group discussions and 25 expert interviews in two provinces in Sumatra, Indonesia, our findings reveal significant gaps in procedural equity, highlighting inadequate mechanisms for voicing concerns, insufficient procedures for meaningful participation, and a lack of attention to expected implementation procedures. Most importantly, we uncover the critical need to recognise historical and ongoing relationships between communities and companies when designing corporate sustainability policies. Recognising equity as an evolving concept that ideally should be shaped by contextual realities, our study advocates for the integration of relational aspects and care-based support into ZDCs, complementing the current understanding of equity.Author summary: We explore how Zero Deforestation Commitments (ZDCs) are perceived and implemented at the local level in Indonesia, focusing on the interactions between communities and corporations. Through 28 focus groups and 25 expert interviews, we uncover shortfalls in procedural equity related to ZDCs, including poor community feedback mechanisms, limited meaningful participation, and insensitivity towards the local communities’ expectations of ZDCs. This study emphasizes the necessity to view equity not just as a policy checklist but as a dynamic, evolving concept deeply influenced by local contexts and historical relationships. By advocating for the integration of relational and care-based perspectives into ZDCs, we enrich the current understanding of equity, urging sustainability actors to foster deeper, more meaningful engagements in the landscapes where they operate.

Suggested Citation

  • Adelina Chandra & Janina Grabs & Eva-Marie Meemken & Rachael D Garrett, 2026. "Relational aspects and care-based support in Zero-Deforestation Commitments," PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000235
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000235
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000235&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katrina Brown & Esteve Corbera, 2003. "Exploring equity and sustainable development in the new carbon economy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(sup1), pages 41-56, November.
    2. Thomas Addoah & Joss Lyons‐White & Federico Cammelli & Keessy Maria‐Prisca Kouakou & Sophia Carodenuto & William J. Thompson & Cécile Renier & Rachael D. Garrett, 2025. "Is the Implementation of Cocoa Companies' Forest Policies on Track to Effectively and Equitably Address Deforestation in West Africa?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 5197-5213, August.
    3. McDermott, Constance L. & Addoah, Thomas & Agyarko-Kwarteng, Tawiah & Asare, Rebecca & Assanvo, Alex & Lima, Mairon Bastos & Bellfield, Helen & Berlan, Amanda & Carodenuto, Sophia & Gardner, Toby & Ga, 2025. "Equity in unilateral value chain policies: A monitoring framework for the EUDR and beyond," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Macdonald, Kate & Diprose, Rachel & Grabs, Janina & Schleifer, Philip & Alger, Justin & Cashore, Benjamin William & Cisneros, Paúl & Delgado Pugley, Deborah & Garrett, Rachael & Hopkinson, William, 2023. "Jurisdictional approaches to sustainable commodity governance," Sustainable Global Supply Chains Discussion Papers 4, Research Network Sustainable Global Supply Chains.
    5. Thorpe, Jodie, 2018. "Procedural Justice in Value Chains Through Public–private Partnerships," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 162-175.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McGrath, F.L. & Carrasco, L.R. & Leimona, B., 2017. "How auctions to allocate payments for ecosystem services contracts impact social equity," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 44-55.
    2. Kosoy, Nicolás & Corbera, Esteve, 2010. "Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1228-1236, April.
    3. Soliman, Salma & Papanastassiou, Marina & Saka-Helmhout, Ayse, 2023. "The role of subsidiaries in Global Value Chains (GVCs): An institutional voids perspective on LVC upgrading and integration," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    4. Kathleen McAfee, 2012. "The Contradictory Logic of Global Ecosystem Services Markets," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(1), pages 105-131, January.
    5. Chelsea Batavia & Michael Paul Nelson, 2018. "Translating climate change policy into forest management practice in a multiple-use context: the role of ethics," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 81-94, May.
    6. Richey, Lisa Ann & Ponte, Stefano, 2021. "Brand Aid and coffee value chain development interventions: Is Starbucks working aid out of business?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    7. Fisher, J.A. & Cavanagh, C.J. & Sikor, T. & Mwayafu, D.M., 2018. "Linking notions of justice and project outcomes in carbon offset forestry projects: Insights from a comparative study in Uganda," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 259-268.
    8. Haas, Johannes Christian & Loft, Lasse & Pham, Thuy Thu, 2019. "How fair can incentive-based conservation get? The interdependence of distributional and contextual equity in Vietnam's payments for Forest Environmental Services Program," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 205-214.
    9. Teresia Rindefjäll & Emma Lund & Johannes Stripple, 2011. "Wine, fruit, and emission reductions: the CDM as development strategy in Chile," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 7-22, March.
    10. Tschakert, Petra, 2007. "Environmental services and poverty reduction: Options for smallholders in the Sahel," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 75-86, April.
    11. Muflikh, Y.N. & Smith, C. & Brown, C. & Aziz, A.A., 2021. "Analysing price volatility in agricultural value chains using systems thinking: A case study of the Indonesian chilli value chain," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    12. Baynes, Jack & Herbohn, John & Dressler, Wolfram, 2016. "Power relationships: Their effect on the governance of community forestry in the Philippines," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 169-176.
    13. Peter Newell, 2007. "The Kyoto Protocol and Beyond: The World After 2012," Human Development Occasional Papers (1992-2007) HDOCPA-2007-37, Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
    14. Stephen Axon, 2024. "Unveiling Understandings of the Rio Declaration’s Sustainability Principles: A Case of Alternative Concepts, Misaligned (Dis)Connections, and Terminological Evolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Esteve Corbera & Adrian Martin, 2015. "Carbon offsets: Accommodation or resistance?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(10), pages 2023-2030, October.
    16. Dwi Ratna Hidayati & Elena Garnevska & Paul Childerhouse, 2021. "Sustainable Agrifood Value Chain—Transformation in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Gannon, Kate & Crick, Florence & Atela, Joanes & Babagaliyeva, Shanna & Batool, Samavia & Bedelian, Claire & Conway, Declan & Diop, Mamadou & Fankhauser, Samuel & Jobbins, Guy & Ludi, Eva & Qaisrani, , 2020. "Private adaptation in semi-arid lands: a tailored approach to ‘leave no one behind’," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102537, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Sell, Joachim & Koellner, Thomas & Weber, Olaf & Pedroni, Lucio & Scholz, Roland W., 2006. "Decision criteria of European and Latin American market actors for tropical forestry projects providing environmental services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 17-36, June.
    19. Evans Appiah Kissi & Christian Herzig, 2024. "The implications of governance factors for economic and social upgrading in Ghana’s cocoa value chain," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Maxwell T Boykoff & Adam Bumpus & Diana Liverman & Samual Randalls, 2009. "Theorizing the Carbon Economy: Introduction to the Special Issue," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(10), pages 2299-2304, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: sustaintransform (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.