IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346669.html

The correction of the urban-rural wealth Gini coefficient of China

Author

Listed:
  • Pingsheng Dai
  • Zhaohui Jin

Abstract

Due to the lack of top wealth records in household surveys, many scholars believe that China’s wealth Gini coefficient is seriously underestimated. Based on data from CFPS (China Household Panel Survey), this paper corrects the urban-rural wealth Gini coefficient of China in combination with the Hurun Rich List. The study finds that real estate accounts for more than 75% of total assets, and financial assets account for less than 20% of total assets. Housing inequality contributes more than 75% to wealth inequality. The urban-rural decomposition of the wealth Gini coefficient shows that the contribution rate of urban-rural wealth inequality to the total wealth Gini coefficient is more than 50%. After the correction based on data from the Rich List, the urban wealth Gini coefficient of China is at the level of 0.70, and the urban-rural wealth Gini coefficient of China shows an inverted U-shaped change.

Suggested Citation

  • Pingsheng Dai & Zhaohui Jin, 2026. "The correction of the urban-rural wealth Gini coefficient of China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346669
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346669
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346669&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dagum, Camilo, 1997. "A New Approach to the Decomposition of the Gini Income Inequality Ratio," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 515-531.
    2. Satya Paul & Sriram Shankar, 2020. "An alternative single parameter functional form for Lorenz curve," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1393-1402, September.
    3. Wang, Anbang & Ma, Junqiao & He, Ke, 2026. "Citizenization and urban–rural income inequality: Evidence from the reform of hukou system in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Philip Vermeulen, 2018. "How Fat is the Top Tail of the Wealth Distribution?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 64(2), pages 357-387, June.
    5. Klass, Oren S. & Biham, Ofer & Levy, Moshe & Malcai, Ofer & Solomon, Sorin, 2006. "The Forbes 400 and the Pareto wealth distribution," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 290-295, February.
    6. Dongyub Lee & Sangwon Suh, 2025. "Measuring Income and Wealth Inequality: A Note on the Gini Coefficient for Samples with Negative Values," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 947-965, February.
    7. Chen, Chau-Nan & Tsaur, Tien-Wang & Rhai, Tong-Shieng, 1982. "The Gini Coefficient and Negative Income," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 473-478, November.
    8. Vanesa Jorda & José María Sarabia & Markus Jäntti, 2021. "Inequality measurement with grouped data: Parametric and non‐parametric methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(3), pages 964-984, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ji Hyung Lee & Yuya Sasaki & Alexis Akira Toda & Yulong Wang, 2022. "Capital and Labor Income Pareto Exponents in the United States, 1916-2019," Papers 2206.04257, arXiv.org.
    2. Toda, Alexis Akira, 2019. "Wealth distribution with random discount factors," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 101-113.
    3. Achille VERNIZZI & Maria Giovanna MONTI & Marek KOSNY, 2006. "An overall inequality reducing and horizontally equitable tax system with application to Polish data," Departmental Working Papers 2006-15, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    4. Tippet, Benjamin & Onaran, Özlem & Wildauer, Rafael, 2024. "The case for a progressive annual wealth tax in the UK updated," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 47322, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    5. Stachurski, John & Toda, Alexis Akira, 2019. "An impossibility theorem for wealth in heterogeneous-agent models with limited heterogeneity," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1-24.
    6. Sałach, Katarzyna & Brzeziński, Michał, 2022. "Political connections and the super-rich in Poland," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    7. David Gallusser & Matthias Krapf, 2022. "Joint Income-Wealth Inequality: Evidence from Lucerne Tax Data," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 251-295, August.
    8. Engel, Janina & Ohlwerter, Dennis & Scherer, Matthias, 2023. "On the estimation of distributional household wealth: addressing under-reporting via optimization problems with invariant Gini coefficient," Working Paper Series 2865, European Central Bank.
    9. Arun Advani & George Bangham & Jack Leslie, 2021. "The UK's wealth distribution and characteristics of high‐wealth households," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3-4), pages 397-430, September.
    10. Michal Brzezinski & Katarzyna Sałach & Marcin Wroński, 2019. "Wealth inequality in Central and Eastern Europe: evidence from joined household survey and rich lists’ data," Working Papers 2019-09, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    11. Alexis Akira Toda & Yulong Wang, 2021. "Efficient minimum distance estimation of Pareto exponent from top income shares," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 228-243, March.
    12. Dongyub Lee & Sangwon Suh, 2025. "Measuring Income and Wealth Inequality: A Note on the Gini Coefficient for Samples with Negative Values," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 947-965, February.
    13. De Rosa, Mauricio & Vilá, Joan, 2026. "Taxing the rich in Latin America: Effects of a wealth tax on revenue and distribution," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1440-1466.
    14. José María Sarabia & Vanesa Jordá & Mercedes Tejería, 2025. "Estimating Income Inequality Using Single-Parameter Lorenz Curves: A New Proposal," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 581-597, August.
    15. Sofie R. Waltl & Robin Chakraborty, 2022. "Missing the wealthy in the HFCS: micro problems with macro implications," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(1), pages 169-203, March.
    16. von Fintel, Dieter & Orthofer, Anna, 2020. "Wealth inequality and financial inclusion: Evidence from South African tax and survey records," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 568-578.
    17. Michał Brzeziński & Katarzyna Sałach & Marcin Wroński, 2020. "Wealth inequality in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from household survey and rich lists’ data combined," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 637-660, October.
    18. David Gallusser & Matthias Krapf, 2019. "Joint Income-Wealth Inequality: An Application Using Administrative Tax Data," CESifo Working Paper Series 7876, CESifo.
    19. Benjamin Ferschli & Jakob Kapeller & Bernhard Schütz & Rafael Wildauer, 2017. "Bestände und Konzentration privater Vermögen in Österreich 2014/2015," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 43(4), pages 499-533.
    20. Gouin-Bonenfant, Emilien & Toda, Alexis Akira, 2018. "Pareto Extrapolation: Bridging Theoretical and Quantitative Models of Wealth Inequality," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt90n2h2bb, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.