IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0344081.html

Hybridizing deep learning algorithms and geostatistical approaches for improved crop yield disaggregation

Author

Listed:
  • Saravanakumar R.
  • Rajni Jain
  • Vaibhav Kumar Singh
  • Anshu Bharadwaj
  • Vinay Kumar Sehgal
  • Ankur Biswas
  • Alka Arora
  • Hari Krishna

Abstract

Reliable crop yield estimates at fine spatial resolution are essential for precision agriculture, food security planning, and insurance schemes. However, yield statistics are reported at coarser administrative levels, limiting their applicability for field-scale analysis. This study proposes a multi-stage hybridized framework that integrates deep learning (DL) models with geostatistical residual kriging to disaggregate village-level crop yield statistics to the pixel level. The proposed methodology is demonstrated using wheat and mustard crops as case study in the semi-arid districts, Haryana, India. The study identifies suitable data combination by evaluating multiple combinations of soil, weather, Sentinel-1, and Sentinel-2 bands data for yield disaggregation. Results show that datasets combining spectral and weather information consistently outperform other data combinations. Validation results showed that the strongest numerical accuracy was observed for machine learning algorithms, e.g., random forest, with an R2 of 0.9949, but it lacks spatial realism. On the other hand, DL models had comparable numerical accuracy and also produced smoother and more realistic spatial transitions but exhibited spatially structured residuals. To mitigate these spatial biases, residual kriging was applied to DL outputs, resulting in RMSE reduction of 35–45% and generating smoother pixel-level maps that preserved fine-scale heterogeneity and aligned with reported village yields. Moran’s I analysis confirmed significant residual spatial autocorrelation for DL models, justifying the use of geostatistical correction. Thus, the proposed hybridized framework emerged as best for balancing statistical accuracy with spatially realistic yield disaggregation. This study provides one of the first empirical demonstrations of village-to-pixel yield disaggregation using the identified weather and satellite band data combination.

Suggested Citation

  • Saravanakumar R. & Rajni Jain & Vaibhav Kumar Singh & Anshu Bharadwaj & Vinay Kumar Sehgal & Ankur Biswas & Alka Arora & Hari Krishna, 2026. "Hybridizing deep learning algorithms and geostatistical approaches for improved crop yield disaggregation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-30, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344081
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344081&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0344081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Carter & Alain de Janvry & Elisabeth Sadoulet & Alexandros Sarris, 2017. "Index Insurance for Developing Country Agriculture: A Reassessment," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 421-438, October.
    2. Michael Carter & Alain de Janvry & Elisabeth Sadoulet & Alexandros Sarris, 2017. "Index Insurance for Developing Country Agriculture: A Reassessment," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 421-438, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quentin Stoeffler & Michael Carter & Catherine Guirkinger & Wouter Gelade, 2022. "The Spillover Impact of Index Insurance on Agricultural Investment by Cotton Farmers in Burkina Faso," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 36(1), pages 114-140.
    2. Kramer, Berber & Cecchi, Francesco & Levine, Madison & Waithaka, Lilian, 2025. "See it grow: A randomized evaluation of a digital innovation to improve crop insurance contract design," IFPRI discussion papers 2396, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Castaing, Pauline & Gazeaud, Jules, 2025. "Do index insurance programs live up to their promises? Aggregating evidence from multiple experiments," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Christian Hott & Judith Regner, 2023. "Weather extremes, agriculture and the value of weather index insurance," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 48(2), pages 230-259, September.
    5. de Janvry, Alain & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 2020. "Using agriculture for development: Supply- and demand-side approaches," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. B. Kelsey Jack & Seema Jayachandran & Namrata Kala & Rohini Pande, 2025. "Money (Not) to Burn: Payments for Ecosystem Services to Reduce Crop Residue Burning," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 7(1), pages 39-55, March.
    7. Bozzola, Martina & Smale, Melinda, 2020. "The welfare effects of crop biodiversity as an adaptation to climate shocks in Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Schwab, Benjamin & Yu, Jisang, 2022. "Guaranteed Storage? Risk and Credit Constraints in the Demand for Postharvest Technology and Rice Seed Storage Decisions in Bangladesh," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322475, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Matthieu Stigler & Apratim Dey & Andrew Hobbs & David Lobell, 2022. "With big data come big problems: pitfalls in measuring basis risk for crop index insurance," Papers 2209.14611, arXiv.org.
    10. Laura Moritz & Lena Kuhn & Ihtiyor Bobojonov, 2025. "The Impact of Agricultural Index Insurance on Farmers' Welfare and Climate Resilience: Findings From Uzbekistan," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 69(3), pages 598-610, July.
    11. Adong, Annet & Ambler, Kate & Bloem, Jeffrey R. & de Brauw, Alan & Herskowitz, Sylvan & Islam, A.H.M. Saiful & Wagner, Julia, 2025. "The unmet financial needs of intermediary firms within agri-food value chains in Uganda and Bangladesh," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    12. Olivier Lopez & Daniel Nkameni, 2025. "Combination of traditional and parametric insurance: calibration method based on the optimization of a criterion adapted to heavy tail losses," Papers 2507.18207, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    13. James B. Keller & Tina L. Saitone, 2022. "Basis risk in the pasture, rangeland, and forage insurance program: Evidence from California," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(4), pages 1203-1223, August.
    14. Erwin Bulte & Rein Haagsma, 2021. "The Welfare Effects of Index-Based Livestock Insurance: Livestock Herding on Communal Lands," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(4), pages 587-613, April.
    15. Belissa, Temesgen K. & Lensink, Robert & Marr, Ana, 2025. "The impact of bundling index insurance with credit and input vouchers: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    16. Stoeffler, Quentin & Opuz, Gülce, 2022. "Price, information and product quality: Explaining index insurance demand in Burkina Faso," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    17. Laura Moritz & Lena Kuhn & Ihtiyor Bobojonov, 2023. "The role of peer imitation in agricultural index insurance adoption: Findings from lab‐in‐the‐field experiments in Kyrgyzstan," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 1649-1672, August.
    18. Kuhn, Lena & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor, 2024. "How sustainable is premium subsidization for index insurance? - A quantitative impact analysis along a global program database," GEWISOLA 64th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 25–27, 2024 364721, GEWISOLA.
    19. Elinor Benami & Michael R. Carter, 2021. "Can digital technologies reshape rural microfinance? Implications for savings, credit, & insurance," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1196-1220, December.
    20. Lichtenberg, Erik & Iglesias, Eva, 2022. "Index insurance and basis risk: A reconsideration," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.