IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0342593.html

Scenario-based portfolio optimization via bootstrapping and machine learning methods: Theory development and empirical evidence from the Tehran Stock Market

Author

Listed:
  • Morteza Amini
  • Sajedeh Javadi
  • Majid Soleimani-damaneh

Abstract

Predicting future returns and modeling return uncertainty are essential yet challenging tasks in portfolio optimization. To address these issues, this study proposes a hybrid approach combining machine learning for return prediction, bootstrapping for uncertainty modeling, and scenario optimization for portfolio selection in the presence of uncertainty. Bootstrap samples are used to generate multiple return trajectories via machine learning, with each trajectory treated as a distinct scenario in a scenario-based mean-variance optimization framework. Empirical results using data from the Tehran Stock Market demonstrate that the proposed model produces optimal portfolios that align more closely with those derived from actual prices, compared to those generated by traditional techniques. Our results show that the combination of bootstrapping, machine learning-based prediction, and scenario optimization is a compelling alternative to classical methods. Indeed, by combining bootstrapping, as a non-parametric method for uncertainty quantification, with machine learning, the model avoids strong distributional assumptions (e.g., normality of returns) and works without assuming a predefined form of uncertainty set. In addition to illustrating the advantages of our approach by implementing it on real-world datasets, we theoretically prove that the resulting scenario optimization problem is a convex program that generates efficient solutions superior to those produced by worst-case robust optimization techniques. Furthermore, the developed framework can accommodate different machine learning models and bootstrapping techniques. Moreover, the use of scenario optimization is computationally tractable and aligns with even large-scale projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Morteza Amini & Sajedeh Javadi & Majid Soleimani-damaneh, 2026. "Scenario-based portfolio optimization via bootstrapping and machine learning methods: Theory development and empirical evidence from the Tehran Stock Market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-49, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342593
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342593
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342593&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0342593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tze Leung Lai & Haipeng Xing & Zehao Chen, 2011. "Mean--variance portfolio optimization when means and covariances are unknown," Papers 1108.0996, arXiv.org.
    2. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Christina Dan & Chen, Zhao & Lian, Yimin & Chen, Min, 2022. "Asset selection based on high frequency Sharpe ratio," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 168-188.
    2. Sujan Adhikari & Pawan Kumar Jha, Ph.D., 2016. "Applicability of Portfolio Theory in Nepali Stock Market," NRB Economic Review, Nepal Rastra Bank, Economic Research Department, vol. 28(1), pages 65-92, April.
    3. Lian, Yu-Min & Chen, Jun-Home, 2019. "Portfolio selection in a multi-asset, incomplete-market economy," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 228-238.
    4. Ka Wai Tsang & Zhaoyi He, 2020. "Mean-Variance Portfolio Management with Functional Optimization," Papers 2005.12774, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.
    5. Shi, Huai-Long & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2022. "Factor volatility spillover and its implications on factor premia," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Ho, Ron Yiu-wah & Strange, Roger & Piesse, Jenifer, 2006. "On the conditional pricing effects of beta, size, and book-to-market equity in the Hong Kong market," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 199-214, July.
    7. Muhammad Kashif & Thomas Leirvik, 2022. "The MAX Effect in an Oil Exporting Country: The Case of Norway," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Michel Fliess & Cédric Join, 2009. "Systematic risk analysis: first steps towards a new definition of beta," Post-Print inria-00425077, HAL.
    9. Barbara Fidanza & Ottorino Morresi, 2021. "Size and Value Anomalies in European Bank Stocks," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(12), pages 227-227, July.
    10. Bo-Hung Chiou & Shen-Ho Chang, 2020. "Influence of Investment Efficiency by Managers and Accounting Conservatism on Idiosyncratic Risks to Investors," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8.
    11. Constantinos Antoniou & John A. Doukas & Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, 2016. "Investor Sentiment, Beta, and the Cost of Equity Capital," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 347-367, February.
    12. Radosław Kurach, 2013. "Does Beta Explain Global Equity Market Volatility – Some Empirical Evidence," Contemporary Economics, Vizja University, vol. 7(2), June.
    13. Zabolotnyy, Serihiy & Wasilewski, Mirosław, 2018. "Operating and financial leverage as risk measures in agricultural companies," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 276377, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    14. Shi, Yun & Cui, Xiangyu & Zhou, Xunyu, 2020. "Beta and Coskewness Pricing: Perspective from Probability Weighting," SocArXiv 5rqhv, Center for Open Science.
    15. Abugri, Benjamin A. & Dutta, Sandip, 2014. "Are we overestimating REIT idiosyncratic risk? Analysis of pricing effects and persistence," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 249-259.
    16. David E. Allen & Michael McAleer & Abhay K. Singh, 2019. "Daily market news sentiment and stock prices," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(30), pages 3212-3235, June.
    17. Sree Vinutha Venkataraman, 2023. "A remark on mean‐semivariance behaviour: Downside risk and capital asset pricing," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2683-2695, July.
    18. Flouris, Triant & Walker, Thomas, 2005. "Financial Comparisons Across Different Business Models in the Canadian Airline Industry," 46th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Washington, D.C., March 6-8, 2005 208157, Transportation Research Forum.
    19. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2256 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Dipankar Mondal & N. Selvaraju, 2022. "Convexity, two-fund separation and asset ranking in a mean-LPM portfolio selection framework," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 225-248, March.
    21. Anders Johansson, 2009. "An analysis of dynamic risk in the Greater China equity markets," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 299-320.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.