IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0342410.html

Drivers of international convergence in digital two-sided platform markets: The case of dominant business model components in online lending

Author

Listed:
  • Sabine Pur
  • Stefan Huesig
  • Christoph Schmidhammer

Abstract

Online lending marketplaces have emerged as potentially disruptive players in the financial industry by digitally connecting borrowers and lenders. However, little is known about the emergence of dominant business model patterns in this regulated, platform-based service industry. Drawing on dominant design theory, this study examines the international convergence of business model components in online lending since 2005. Using a comparative, longitudinal case study of the market leaders Funding Circle (the UK), LendingClub (the USA), and auxmoney (Germany), we analyze the Business Model Canvas components “customer segments” and “value propositions.” Our findings reveal a convergence toward peer-to-institution models, shaped by regulatory pressures, technological advances, and institutional capital. All marketplaces now address underserved borrower segments such as SMEs, the self-employed, and founders, while excluding retail investors. This indicates the emergence of internationally dominant business model components in potentially disruptive two-sided platform markets. We synthesize these findings into a generic, process-oriented model explaining how platform convergence unfolds across national contexts. This study extends dominant design theory to business models in regulated service industries and highlights external forces as key drivers of standardization. It offers practical insights for policymakers, institutional investors, and marketplace operators navigating scalability, regulation, and financial integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabine Pur & Stefan Huesig & Christoph Schmidhammer, 2026. "Drivers of international convergence in digital two-sided platform markets: The case of dominant business model components in online lending," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-30, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342410
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342410
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342410&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0342410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nataliya Barasinska & Nicola Jentzsch & Dorothea Schäfer, 2011. "Internet-Kreditplattformen ziehen immer mehr traditionelle Kreditnehmer an," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 78(36), pages 2-9.
    2. Andre Boik, 2018. "Prediction and Identification in Two-Sided Markets," CESifo Working Paper Series 6857, CESifo.
    3. Fernando F. Suárez & James M. Utterback, 1995. "Dominant designs and the survival of firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(6), pages 415-430.
    4. Haselmann, Rainer & Tröger, Tobias, 2021. "What are the main differences between the practice of supervising large banks in the UK and in the euro area, and what are the main risks of regulatory divergence?," SAFE White Paper Series 86, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    5. B. Demil & X. Lecocq, 2010. "Business model evolution : in search of dynamic consistency," Post-Print hal-00572915, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ionica Oncioiu & Sorinel Căpuşneanu & Dan Ioan Topor & Ana Maria Ifrim & Ramona Camelia Silvestru & Monica Ioana Toader, 2021. "Improving Business Processes in a Construction Project and Increasing Performance by Using Target Costing," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    2. Christiana Müller & Stefan Vorbach, 2015. "Enabling Business Model Change: Evidence from High-Technology Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 11(1), pages 53-75.
    3. Hagedoorn, John & Carayannis, Elias & Alexander, Jeffrey, 2001. "Strange bedfellows in the personal computer industry: technology alliances between IBM and Apple," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 837-849, May.
    4. Emmanuelle Reuter, 2022. "Hybrid business models in the sharing economy: The role of business model design for managing the environmental paradox," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 603-618, February.
    5. Régis Coeurderoy & Rodolphe Durand, 2001. "La cohérence des choix stratégiques:l'impact des décisions d'entrée et des stratégies génériques sur la performance organisationnelle des firmes," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 4(3), pages 57-88, September.
    6. Omar Shafqat & Elena Malakhatka & Nina Chrobot & Per Lundqvist, 2021. "End Use Energy Services Framework Co-Creation with Multiple Stakeholders—A Living Lab-Based Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    7. Hock-Doepgen, Marianne & Clauss, Thomas & Kraus, Sascha & Cheng, Cheng-Feng, 2021. "Knowledge management capabilities and organizational risk-taking for business model innovation in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 683-697.
    8. Hualde, Alfredo & Micheli, Jordy, 2016. "The evolution of call centres and the implications for service quality and workforce management in Mexico," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 43205.
    9. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    10. Amandine Maus & Sylvie Sammut, 2018. "Business model innovation in incubators: the role played by dynamic capabilities theory," Post-Print hal-02466175, HAL.
    11. Gerrit Remane & Andre Hanelt & Jan F. Tesch & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2017. "The Business Model Pattern Database — A Tool For Systematic Business Model Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-61, January.
    12. Tim Benijts, 2014. "A Business Sustainability Model for Government Corporations. A Belgian Case Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 204-216, March.
    13. Shuting Chen & Liping Huang & Aojie Zhou, 2025. "How Knowledge Management Capability Drives Sustainable Business Model Innovation: A Combination of Symmetric and Asymmetric Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Puie Florina Răzvanţă, 2019. "Conceptual framework for rural business models," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Paradigm, vol. 13(1), pages 1130-1139, May.
    15. Karen Ruckman & Nilesh Saraf & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2015. "Market Positioning by IT Service Vendors Through Imitation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 100-126, March.
    16. Edwige Fain & Stéphane Lemarié & Aline Fugeray-Scarbel & Adrien Hervouet, 2026. "Towards reduced pesticide use in agriculture: A multiple-case study of agrosupply business models for low pesticide solutions," Post-Print hal-05476198, HAL.
    17. Souto, Jaime E., 2015. "Business model innovation and business concept innovation as the context of incremental innovation and radical innovation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 142-155.
    18. Qinying Fang & Liwen Chen & Dalin Zeng & Lin Zhang, 2019. "Drivers of Professional Service Model Innovation in the Chinese Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Alexis Laszczuk & Lionel Garreau & Bernard de Montmorillon, 2017. "Understanding emergence in business model development: how companies interact with stakeholders to deal with environmental ambiguity," Post-Print hal-01787276, HAL.
    20. Jianyu Zhao & Yining Huang & Xi Xi & Shanshan Wang, 2021. "How knowledge heterogeneity influences business model design: mediating effects of strategic learning and bricolage," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 889-919, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.