IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0336928.html

Accessibility measurement of highway transportation networks based on closeness-accessibility

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanyuan Zhang
  • Weidong Song
  • Jinguang Sun
  • Peng Dai

Abstract

Accessibility is a central concept in transport geography research. Quantitative assessment of highway network accessibility aids in assessing road network efficiency, urban layout optimization, functional zoning and sustainable development. Current metrics for assessing accessibility primarily concentrate on examining the relationship between land use and transportation networks, overlooking the influence of trip demand and node centrality on highway network accessibility. To clarify these impacts, borrowing from concepts in network science, we propose a new centrality measure called closeness-accessibility. This approach utilizes closeness centrality of network nodes as a weight to assess the interaction potential between nodes, enhances the gravity-based accessibility of demand points based on trip time, and incorporates network connectivity to evaluate the impact of travel demand on highway network accessibility and the significance of node centrality non-uniformity. Liaoning Province provides an empirical case study to showcase the usefulness of closeness-accessibility. The findings indicate a positive correlation between the gravity-based and closeness-accessibility generated by various β values, showing a linear relationship between the two. Closeness-accessibility takes into account the number and centrality of demand points in influencing travel demand, enhances the calculation of the shortest paths of the spatial location of the demand nodes, and improves the accuracy of accessibility calculations. Nodes with higher centrality exhibit greater accessibility, leading to clearer delineation of accessibility levels for demand points and highway network across different regions. In Liaoning Province, the areas with high demand attraction and highway network accessibility are concentrated in the coastal area and the provincial capital center, while accessibility services in western part are inadequate. Although all grades of highway accessibility service are high, higher-grade highways sometimes show lower accessibility. This research offers a methodological tool for transportation experts and holds significant importance in the scientific and effective evaluation of transportation system performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanyuan Zhang & Weidong Song & Jinguang Sun & Peng Dai, 2025. "Accessibility measurement of highway transportation networks based on closeness-accessibility," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336928
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336928
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336928&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0336928?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B J Linneker & N A Spence, 1992. "Accessibility Measures Compared in an Analysis of the Impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway on Britain," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(8), pages 1137-1154, August.
    2. Michael Wegener & Franz Fuerst, 2004. "Land-Use Transport Interaction: State of the Art," Urban/Regional 0409005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rivera-Gonzalez, Carlos & Amaral, Julia C., 2024. "Assessment of freight accessibility in New York City: A spatial-temporal approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Toşa, Cristian & Sato, Hitomi & Morikawa, Takayuki & Miwa, Tomio, 2018. "Commuting behavior in emerging urban areas: Findings of a revealed-preferences and stated-intentions survey in Cluj-Napoca, Romania," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 78-93.
    3. Chen, Shaopei & Claramunt, Christophe & Ray, Cyril, 2014. "A spatio-temporal modelling approach for the study of the connectivity and accessibility of the Guangzhou metropolitan network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 12-23.
    4. Raimbault, Juste & Le Néchet, Florent, 2021. "Introducing endogenous transport provision in a LUTI model to explore polycentric governance systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Han, Feng & Ke, Shanzi, 2016. "The effects of factor proximity and market potential on urban manufacturing output," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 31-45.
    6. Seya, Hajime & Nakamichi, Kumiko & Yamagata, Yoshiki, 2016. "The residential parking rent price elasticity of car ownership in Japan," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 123-134.
    7. Paul Lawless & Tony Gore, 1999. "Urban Regeneration and Transport Investment: A Case Study of Sheffield 1992-96," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 527-545, March.
    8. Áron Kovács & András Bozóti & Zsuzsanna Pótó & Márta Bakucz, 2014. "Medicinal and Thermal Spas in South and West Transdanubia - The Significance of Accessibility," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 5(5), pages 81-98, October.
    9. Chandra, Shailesh & Naik, R. Thirumaleswara & Venkatesh, Manoj & Mudgal, Abhisek, 2021. "Accessibility evaluations of the proposed road user charge (RUC) program in California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 12-26.
    10. Pokharel, Ramesh & Bertolini, Luca & te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Acharya, Surya Raj, 2021. "Spatio-temporal evolution of cities and regional economic development in Nepal: Does transport infrastructure matter?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Gao, Jiong & Ma, Shoufeng & Zou, Hongyang & Du, Huibin, 2023. "How does population agglomeration influence the adoption of new energy vehicles? Evidence from 290 cities in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    12. Jasper Willigers, 2003. "High-speed railway developments and corporate location decisions. The role of accessibility," ERSA conference papers ersa03p61, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Robson, Edward N. & Wijayaratna, Kasun P. & Dixit, Vinayak V., 2018. "A review of computable general equilibrium models for transport and their applications in appraisal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 31-53.
    14. J Gutiérrez & A Monzón & J M Piñero, 1998. "Accessibility, Network Efficiency, and Transport Infrastructure Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(8), pages 1337-1350, August.
    15. Condeço-Melhorado, Ana & Gutiérrez, Javier & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2011. "Spatial impacts of road pricing: Accessibility, regional spillovers and territorial cohesion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 185-203, March.
    16. Benevenuto, Rodolfo & Caulfield, Brian, 2020. "Measuring access to urban centres in rural Northeast Brazil: A spatial accessibility poverty index," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    17. P Lawless & G Dabinett, 1995. "Urban Regeneration and Transport Investment: A Research Agenda," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(7), pages 1029-1048, July.
    18. Veronique Van Acker & Frank Witlox, 2005. "Exploring the relationship between land-use system and travel behaviour - some first findings," ERSA conference papers ersa05p601, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Zhu, Pengyu & Tan, Xinying & Zhao, Songnian & Shi, Shuai & Wang, Mingshu, 2022. "Land use regulations, transit investment, and commuting preferences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    20. Nimrod Serok & Orr Levy & Shlomo Havlin & Efrat Blumenfeld-Lieberthal, 2019. "Unveiling the inter-relations between the urban streets network and its dynamic traffic flows: Planning implication," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(7), pages 1362-1376, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.