IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0330989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boosting health provider performance with non-financial incentives: A cluster-randomized controlled trial in Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Calvin Chiu
  • Agatha Mnyippembe
  • Lila A Sheira
  • Laura Packel
  • Emmanuel Katabaro
  • Werner Maokola
  • Jenny X Liu

Abstract

Background: Non-financial incentives are frequently used to improve performance among healthcare providers, capitalizing on mission-driven intrinsic pro-social motivation. However, the effectiveness of incentives varies across settings and may depend on whether they are provided privately or publicly. Using a cluster-randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05525533) among drug shopkeepers in Tanzania, we designed and evaluated the effectiveness of non-financial incentives in boosting provider performance. Methods: We developed a non-financial incentive that involved providing shopkeepers with monthly reports of aggregated customer feedback compiled from anonymous surveys from young women (15–24) to appeal to shopkeepers’ pro-social motivation for helping these customers. We randomized whether the feedback was provided privately (via a report) or publicly (displaying certificates of the customer feedback ratings). We estimated linear regression models on provider performance as measured by sales across different categories to young women from administrative point-of sales data over 12 months and estimated whether performance measures were correlated with shopkeepers’ pro-social motivation and concern for social image measured by surveys at Baseline. Results: Young women customers completed 9,108 anonymous surveys across 99 shops. Shops receiving non-financial incentives privately did not increase performance. However, shops receiving non-financial incentives publicly reported an increase in sales to young women customers (58%, 95% CI: 20%, 97%), most notably for sexual and reproductive health products (96%, 95% CI: 4%, 187%), specifically oral contraception (154%, 95% CI: 9%, 306%) and pregnancy tests (75%, 95% CI: 8%, 143%). Performance measures were correlated with concern for social image but not pro-social motivation at baseline. Conclusions: Publicly provided non-financial incentives increased performance among drug shopkeepers in Tanzania serving young women. Performance was strongest among those with higher concern for their social image at baseline, rather than those with stronger pro-social motivation. Future interventions using non-financial incentives to motivate healthcare providers should consider leveraging providers’ social image concerns to amplify the effectiveness of incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Calvin Chiu & Agatha Mnyippembe & Lila A Sheira & Laura Packel & Emmanuel Katabaro & Werner Maokola & Jenny X Liu, 2025. "Boosting health provider performance with non-financial incentives: A cluster-randomized controlled trial in Tanzania," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330989
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330989
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330989&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0330989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonardo Bursztyn & Robert Jensen, 2017. "Social Image and Economic Behavior in the Field: Identifying, Understanding, and Shaping Social Pressure," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 131-153, September.
    2. Armin Falk & Anke Becker & Thomas Dohmen & David Huffman & Uwe Sunde, 2023. "The Preference Survey Module: A Validated Instrument for Measuring Risk, Time, and Social Preferences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 1935-1950, April.
    3. Paul Gertler & Ada Kwan, 2024. "The Essential Role of Altruism in Medical Decision Making," NBER Working Papers 32151, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boneva, Teodora & Brás-Monteiro, Ana & Golin, Marta & Rauh, Christopher, 2024. "Are Men's Preferences for Couple Equity Misperceived? Evidence from Six Countries," IZA Discussion Papers 17493, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Glätzle-Rützler, Daniela & Lergetporer, Philipp & Sutter, Matthias, 2021. "Collective intertemporal decisions and heterogeneity in groups," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 131-147.
    3. Daniel Horn & Hubert Kiss Janos & Sára Khayouti, 2020. "Does trust associate with political regime?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2013, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    4. Johannes Abeler & Armin Falk & Fabian Kosse, 2025. "Malleability of Preferences for Honesty," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 135(667), pages 982-998.
    5. Gary Bolton & Eugen Dimant & Ulrich Schmidt, 2018. "When a Nudge Backfires. Using Observation with Social and Economic Incentives to Promote Pro-Social Behavior," PPE Working Papers 0017, Philosophy, Politics and Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    6. Raman Kachurka & Michał W. Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2021. "Persuasive messages will not raise COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Evidence from a nation-wide online experiment," Working Papers 2021-07, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    7. C. Mónica Capra & Bing Jiang & Yuxin Su, 2022. "Do pledges lead to more volunteering? An experimental study," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 87-100, January.
    8. Goytom Abraha Kahsay & Daniel Osberghaus, 2018. "Storm Damage and Risk Preferences: Panel Evidence from Germany," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(1), pages 301-318, September.
    9. Uwe Sunde & Thomas Dohmen & Benjamin Enke & Armin Falkbriq & David Huffman & Gerrit Meyerheim, 2022. "Patience and Comparative Development," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(5), pages 2806-2840.
    10. Fabian Kosse & Thomas Deckers & Pia Pinger & Hannah Schildberg-Hörisch & Armin Falk, 2020. "The Formation of Prosociality: Causal Evidence on the Role of Social Environment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(2), pages 434-467.
    11. Bartels, Lara & Kesternich, Martin, 2022. "Motivate the crowd or crowd- them out? The impact of local government spending on the voluntary provision of a green public good," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-040, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Buser, Thomas & Sangi, Sahar, 2025. "Willingness to Compete in Dirty Competitions," IZA Discussion Papers 17676, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Magnus A. H. Gulbrandsen, 2021. "Peer effects and debt accumulation: Evidence from lottery winnings," Working Paper 2021/10, Norges Bank.
    14. Non, Arjan & Rohde, Ingrid & de Grip, Andries & Dohmen, Thomas, 2022. "Mission of the company, prosocial attitudes and job preferences: A discrete choice experiment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. Cucciniello, Maria & Pin, Paolo & Imre, Blanka & Porumbescu, Gregory A. & Melegaro, Alessia, 2022. "Altruism and vaccination intentions: Evidence from behavioral experiments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    16. Rodríguez Chatruc, Marisol & Rozo, Sandra, 2021. "How Does it Feel to Be Part of the Minority?: Impacts of Perspective Taking on Prosocial Behavior," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 11599, Inter-American Development Bank.
    17. Paola Giuliano & Paola Sapienza, 2020. "The Cost of Being Too Patient," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 110, pages 314-318, May.
    18. Carvajal, Daniel & Franco, Catalina & Isaksson, Siri, 2024. "Will Artificial Intelligence Get in the Way of Achieving Gender Equality?," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 3/2024, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics, revised 28 Apr 2025.
    19. Alain Cohn & Tobias Gesche & Michel André Maréchal, 2022. "Honesty in the Digital Age," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 827-845, February.
    20. Nicolás Ajzenman & Bruno Ferman & Pedro C. Sant'Anna, 2025. "Discrimination in the Formation of Academic Networks: A Field Experiment on #EconTwitter," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 357-375, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.