IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0321525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How can multiple benefit drivers improve corporate ESG performance?—The effects of green technology innovation and peer pressure

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Ma
  • Xiaoqi Dong
  • Peng Shao
  • Zhen Chen

Abstract

To achieve the ‘carbon peaking and carbon neutrality’ objectives, there has been a growing interest in corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance from governmental and supervisory bodies. This heightened focus has posed critical theoretical and practical questions on how firms can enhance their ESG performance to facilitate their transition to a green economy. From a stakeholder perspective, this study examines data from 724 listed Chinese companies spanning 2015–2021. It aims to elucidate the relationship between benefit drivers (such as media attention, financing constraints, and government subsidies) and corporate ESG performance, along with investigating the mediating role of green technology innovation and the moderating influence of peer pressure in this context. The findings suggest that both media attention and government subsidies positively correlate with ESG performance, while financing constraints exhibit a negative correlation. Moreover, green technology innovation serves as a mediator between benefit drivers and corporate ESG performance. Furthermore, peer pressure can serve as a positive moderator in the relationship between media attention and green technology innovation, as well as in the negative relationship between financing constraints and green technology innovation. Conversely, it can negatively moderate the positive relationship between government subsidies and green technology innovation. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that in enterprises with superior resource acquisition capabilities, benefit drivers exert a more pronounced influence on corporate ESG performance. Similarly, in state-owned enterprises, benefit drivers also have a heightened impact on corporate ESG performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Ma & Xiaoqi Dong & Peng Shao & Zhen Chen, 2025. "How can multiple benefit drivers improve corporate ESG performance?—The effects of green technology innovation and peer pressure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321525
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321525
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321525&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0321525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.