IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0317619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Machine Learning and Deep Learning models for predicting Wind Turbine power output from environmental factors

Author

Listed:
  • Montaser Abdelsattar
  • Mohamed A. Ismeil
  • Karim Menoufi
  • Ahmed AbdelMoety
  • Ahmed Emad-Eldeen

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models for predicting Wind Turbine (WT) power output based on environmental variables such as temperature, humidity, wind speed, and wind direction. Along with Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), the following ML models were looked at: Linear Regression (LR), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), Random Forest (RF), Extra Trees (ET), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). Using a dataset of 40,000 observations, the models were assessed based on R-squared, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). ET achieved the highest performance among ML models, with an R-squared value of 0.7231 and a RMSE of 0.1512. Among DL models, ANN demonstrated the best performance, achieving an R-squared value of 0.7248 and a RMSE of 0.1516. The results show that DL models, especially ANN, did slightly better than the best ML models. This means that they are better at modeling non-linear dependencies in multivariate data. Preprocessing techniques, including feature scaling and parameter tuning, improved model performance by enhancing data consistency and optimizing hyperparameters. When compared to previous benchmarks, the performance of both ANN and ET demonstrates significant predictive accuracy gains in WT power output forecasting. This study’s novelty lies in directly comparing a diverse range of ML and DL algorithms while highlighting the potential of advanced computational approaches for renewable energy optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Montaser Abdelsattar & Mohamed A. Ismeil & Karim Menoufi & Ahmed AbdelMoety & Ahmed Emad-Eldeen, 2025. "Evaluating Machine Learning and Deep Learning models for predicting Wind Turbine power output from environmental factors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-31, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317619
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317619
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317619&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0317619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad Shalby & Mohamed R. Gomaa & Ahmad Salah & Abdullah Marashli & Talal Yusaf & Mohamd Laimon, 2023. "Impact of the Air Filtration in the Nacelle on the Wind Turbine Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Neshat, Mehdi & Nezhad, Meysam Majidi & Abbasnejad, Ehsan & Mirjalili, Seyedali & Groppi, Daniele & Heydari, Azim & Tjernberg, Lina Bertling & Astiaso Garcia, Davide & Alexander, Bradley & Shi, Qinfen, 2021. "Wind turbine power output prediction using a new hybrid neuro-evolutionary method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Marvuglia, Antonino & Messineo, Antonio, 2012. "Monitoring of wind farms’ power curves using machine learning techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 574-583.
    4. Stetco, Adrian & Dinmohammadi, Fateme & Zhao, Xingyu & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Barnes, Mike & Keane, John & Nenadic, Goran, 2019. "Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 620-635.
    5. Davide Astolfi & Raymond Byrne & Francesco Castellani, 2020. "Analysis of Wind Turbine Aging through Operation Curves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camila Correa-Jullian & Sergio Cofre-Martel & Gabriel San Martin & Enrique Lopez Droguett & Gustavo de Novaes Pires Leite & Alexandre Costa, 2022. "Exploring Quantum Machine Learning and Feature Reduction Techniques for Wind Turbine Pitch Fault Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    2. Ana Rita Nunes & Hugo Morais & Alberto Sardinha, 2021. "Use of Learning Mechanisms to Improve the Condition Monitoring of Wind Turbine Generators: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Francisco Bilendo & Angela Meyer & Hamed Badihi & Ningyun Lu & Philippe Cambron & Bin Jiang, 2022. "Applications and Modeling Techniques of Wind Turbine Power Curve for Wind Farms—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-38, December.
    4. Erik Möllerström & Sean Gregory & Aromal Sugathan, 2021. "Improvement of AEP Predictions with Time for Swedish Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    5. Meyer, Angela, 2021. "Multi-target normal behaviour models for wind farm condition monitoring," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    6. Cuesta, Jokin & Leturiondo, Urko & Vidal, Yolanda & Pozo, Francesc, 2025. "A review of prognostics and health management techniques in wind energy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    7. Reddy, Sohail R., 2021. "A machine learning approach for modeling irregular regions with multiple owners in wind farm layout design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    8. Chen, Wanqiu & Qiu, Yingning & Feng, Yanhui & Li, Ye & Kusiak, Andrew, 2021. "Diagnosis of wind turbine faults with transfer learning algorithms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 2053-2067.
    9. Mehrjoo, Mehrdad & Jafari Jozani, Mohammad & Pawlak, Miroslaw, 2021. "Toward hybrid approaches for wind turbine power curve modeling with balanced loss functions and local weighting schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    10. Yang, Mao & Wang, Da & Zhang, Wei & Yv, Xinnan, 2024. "A centralized power prediction method for large-scale wind power clusters based on dynamic graph neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    11. Francesco Castellani & Ravi Pandit & Francesco Natili & Francesca Belcastro & Davide Astolfi, 2023. "Advanced Methods for Wind Turbine Performance Analysis Based on SCADA Data and CFD Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Gonzalez, Elena & Stephen, Bruce & Infield, David & Melero, Julio J., 2019. "Using high-frequency SCADA data for wind turbine performance monitoring: A sensitivity study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 841-853.
    13. Lei Fu & Tiantian Zhu & Kai Zhu & Yiling Yang, 2019. "Condition Monitoring for the Roller Bearings of Wind Turbines under Variable Working Conditions Based on the Fisher Score and Permutation Entropy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Stetco, Adrian & Dinmohammadi, Fateme & Zhao, Xingyu & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Barnes, Mike & Keane, John & Nenadic, Goran, 2019. "Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 620-635.
    15. Ti, Zilong & Deng, Xiao Wei & Zhang, Mingming, 2021. "Artificial Neural Networks based wake model for power prediction of wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 618-631.
    16. Deng, Wanru & Liu, Liqin & Dai, Yuanjun & Wu, Haitao & Yuan, Zhiming, 2024. "A prediction method for blade deformations of large-scale FVAWTs using dynamics theory and machine learning techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    17. Lu, Xuefei & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "A data-driven framework for identifying important components in complex systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    18. Xingda Tian & Handong Huang & Suo Cheng & Chao Wang & Pengfei Li & Yaju Hao, 2022. "A Carbonate Reservoir Prediction Method Based on Deep Learning and Multiparameter Joint Inversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Davide Astolfi & Raymond Byrne & Francesco Castellani, 2021. "Estimation of the Performance Aging of the Vestas V52 Wind Turbine through Comparative Test Case Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    20. Jiang, Wenjun & Liu, Bo & Liang, Yang & Gao, Huanxiang & Lin, Pengfei & Zhang, Dongqin & Hu, Gang, 2024. "Applicability analysis of transformer to wind speed forecasting by a novel deep learning framework with multiple atmospheric variables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.