IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral choice of manufacturers, recyclers and customers in Trade-In Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Chan He
  • Qianru An

Abstract

This study investigates the behavioral choices of manufacturers, recyclers, and customers in Trade-In Programs designed to promote recycling and environmental sustainability. Using a manufacturer-led evolutionary game model, the research explores how factors such as government policies, market demand, financial incentives, and the simplicity of participation impact stakeholder engagement in these programs. Numerical simulations were conducted to analyze the effects of specific parameters on each participants’ willingness to participate. Results show that increased subsidies and investment in innovation by manufacturers significantly enhance recycler and customer participation in ethic Trade-In Programs. Conversely, higher revenue-sharing by manufacturers tends to reduce engagement from both parties, while manufacturers receiving substantial brand and social benefits alongside government subsidies to encourage broader stakeholder involvement. These findings offer critical insights for designing effective Trade-In Programs, supporting sustainable recycling practices and circular economy principles. The study provides actionable guidance for policymakers and industry leaders aiming to boost participation in environmentally focused recycling initiatives, laying a foundation for more sustainable industrial practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Chan He & Qianru An, 2024. "Behavioral choice of manufacturers, recyclers and customers in Trade-In Programs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-28, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316344
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316344
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316344&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Sijie & Zheng, Bin & Jia, Dongfeng, 2024. "Optimal decisions for hybrid manufacturing and remanufacturing with trade-in program and carbon tax," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Özden Tozanlı & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2020. "Trade-in-to-upgrade as a marketing strategy in disassembly-to-order systems at the edge of blockchain technology," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(23), pages 7183-7200, December.
    3. Kate J. Li & Duncan K. H. Fong & Susan H. Xu, 2011. "Managing Trade-in Programs Based on Product Characteristics and Customer Heterogeneity in Business-to-Business Markets," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 108-123, October.
    4. Daniel A. Levinthal & Devavrat Purohit, 1989. "Durable Goods and Product Obsolescence," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 35-56.
    5. Wilson, Matthew & Goffnett, Sean, 2022. "Reverse logistics: Understanding end-of-life product management," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 643-655.
    6. Li, Kate J. & Xu, Susan H., 2015. "The comparison between trade-in and leasing of a product with technology innovations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 134-146.
    7. Liu, Jingchen & Zhai, Xin & Chen, Lihua, 2019. "Optimal pricing strategy under trade-in program in the presence of strategic consumers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-17.
    8. Jiaru Bai & Shu Hu & Luyi Gui & Kut C. So & Zu‐Jun Ma, 2021. "Optimal Subsidy Schemes and Budget Allocations for Government‐Subsidized Trade‐in Programs," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2689-2706, August.
    9. Yongbo Xiao & Liming Wang & Jian Chen, 2020. "Dynamic pricing in a trade‐in program with replacement and new customers," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(5), pages 334-352, August.
    10. Cancan Tang & Qiang Hou & Tianhui He, 2024. "Research on closed-loop supply chain decision-making of power battery echelon utilization under the scenario of trade-in," Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 272-302, July.
    11. Kaiying Cao & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2022. "Optimal Trade‐in Return Policies: Is it Wise to be Generous?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1309-1331, March.
    12. Han, Xiaohua & Yang, Qianxia & Shang, Jennifer & Pu, Xujin, 2017. "Optimal strategies for trade-old-for-remanufactured programs: Receptivity, durability, and subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 602-616.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Shu & Zhu, Stuart X. & Fu, Ke, 2023. "Optimal trade-in and refurbishment strategies for durable goods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 133-151.
    2. Xu, Yuqiu & Wang, Jia & Cao, Kaiying, 2024. "Dynamic joint strategy of channel encroachment and logistics choice considering trade-in service and strategic consumers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Kaiying Cao & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2022. "Optimal Trade‐in Return Policies: Is it Wise to be Generous?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1309-1331, March.
    4. Li, Sijie & Zheng, Bin & Jia, Dongfeng, 2024. "Optimal decisions for hybrid manufacturing and remanufacturing with trade-in program and carbon tax," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    5. Cao, Kaiying & Han, Guoxin & Xu, Bing & Wang, Jia, 2020. "Gift card payment or cash payment: Which payment is suitable for trade-in rebate?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Özden Tozanlı & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2020. "Evaluation of Waste Electronic Product Trade-in Strategies in Predictive Twin Disassembly Systems in the Era of Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-33, July.
    7. Xiao, Lu & Wang, Xian-Jia & Chin, Kwai-Sang, 2020. "Trade-in strategies in retail channel and dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    8. Wang, Wei & Feng, Lipan & Chen, Xiaoxu & Yang, Lei & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2024. "Impacts of selling models: Who should offer trade-in programs in e-commerce supply chains?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    9. Fei Tang & Ying Dai & Zu‐Jun Ma, 2023. "Optimal joint trade‐in rebate strategies in a retailer‐led supply chain," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 399-415, January.
    10. Zheng, Bin & Cai, Yajun & Li, Sijie, 2025. "Trade-in and resale in a platform supply chain: Manufacturer’s choice of selling strategies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Hu, Shu & Tang, Yanli, 2024. "Impact of product sharing and heterogeneous consumers on manufacturers offering trade-in programs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    12. Cao, Kaiying & Su, Yunyi & Han, Guoxin & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2022. "Is it wise to offer rebates for unused extended warranties under trade-in programs in supply chains?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Shin, Youngchul & Lee, Sangyoon & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2020. "Robust multiperiod inventory model considering trade-in program and refurbishment service: Implications to emerging markets," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    14. Schwarz, Justus Arne & Tan, Barış, 2021. "Optimal sales and production rollover strategies under capacity constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 507-524.
    15. Cao, Kaiying & Xu, Xiaoyan & Bian, Yiwen & Sun, Yanhong, 2019. "Optimal trade-in strategy of business-to-consumer platform with dual-format retailing model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 181-192.
    16. Chen, Yan & Fang, Yanli & Kuo, Yong-Hong, 2024. "Demand cannibalization during product rollovers in the presence of strategic customers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    17. Quan, Yuting & Hong, Jiangtao & Song, Jingpu & Leng, Mingming, 2021. "Game-theoretic analysis of trade-in services in closed-loop supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    18. Li, Yongjian & Wang, Kun & Xu, Fangchao & Fan, Chunxing, 2022. "Management of trade-in modes by recycling platforms based on consumer heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    19. Wan, Yao & Yang, Lei & Zhang, Jiahua & Feng, Lipan, 2024. "Optimal trade-in programs for quality differentiated recycled products," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    20. Haitao Chen & Qiang Xu & Zhaohui Dong & Hetian Zhao, 2023. "Recycling Versus Leasing in Closed-Loop Supply Chain: A Comparative Analysis Anchored on Consumer Ownership Perceptions," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.