IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0313600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survival machine learning methods for mortality prediction after heart transplantation in the contemporary era

Author

Listed:
  • Lathan Liou
  • Elizabeth Mostofsky
  • Laura Lehman
  • Soziema Salia
  • Francisco J Barrera
  • Ying Wei
  • Amal Cheema
  • Anuradha Lala
  • Andrew Beam
  • Murray A Mittleman

Abstract

Although prediction models for heart transplantation outcomes have been developed previously, a comprehensive benchmarking of survival machine learning methods for mortality prognosis in the most contemporary era of heart transplants following the 2018 donor heart allocation policy change is warranted. This study assessed seven statistical and machine learning algorithms–Lasso, Ridge, Elastic Net, Cox Gradient Boost, Extreme Gradient Boost Linear, Extreme Gradient Boost Tree, and Random Survival Forests in a post-policy cohort of 7,160 adult heart-only transplant recipients in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database who received their first transplant on or after October 18, 2018. A cross-validation framework was designed in mlr. Model performance was also compared in a seasonally-matched pre-policy cohort. In the post-policy cohort, Random Survival Forests and Cox Gradient Boost had the highest performances with C-indices of 0.628 and 0.627. The relative importance of some predictive variables differed between the pre-policy and post-policy cohorts, such as the absence of ECMO in the post-policy cohort. Survival machine learning models provide reasonable prediction of 1-year posttransplant mortality outcomes and continual updating of prediction models is warranted in the contemporary era.

Suggested Citation

  • Lathan Liou & Elizabeth Mostofsky & Laura Lehman & Soziema Salia & Francisco J Barrera & Ying Wei & Amal Cheema & Anuradha Lala & Andrew Beam & Murray A Mittleman, 2025. "Survival machine learning methods for mortality prediction after heart transplantation in the contemporary era," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313600
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313600
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313600&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0313600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon, Noah & Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Rob, 2011. "Regularization Paths for Cox's Proportional Hazards Model via Coordinate Descent," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 39(i05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soave, David & Lawless, Jerald F., 2023. "Regularized regression for two phase failure time studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Hua Xin & Yuhlong Lio & Hsien-Ching Chen & Tzong-Ru Tsai, 2024. "Zero-Inflated Binary Classification Model with Elastic Net Regularization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Zemin Zheng & Jie Zhang & Yang Li, 2022. "L 0 -Regularized Learning for High-Dimensional Additive Hazards Regression," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2762-2775, September.
    4. Simon Bussy & Mokhtar Z. Alaya & Anne‐Sophie Jannot & Agathe Guilloux, 2022. "Binacox: automatic cut‐point detection in high‐dimensional Cox model with applications in genetics," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1414-1426, December.
    5. Biagini, Francesca & Groll, Andreas & Widenmann, Jan, 2013. "Intensity-based premium evaluation for unemployment insurance products," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 302-316.
    6. Benedicte Sjo Tislevoll & Monica Hellesøy & Oda Helen Eck Fagerholt & Stein-Erik Gullaksen & Aashish Srivastava & Even Birkeland & Dimitrios Kleftogiannis & Pilar Ayuda-Durán & Laure Piechaczyk & Dagi, 2023. "Early response evaluation by single cell signaling profiling in acute myeloid leukemia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Matthew F Dixon, 2017. "A High Frequency Trade Execution Model for Supervised Learning," Papers 1710.03870, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    8. Leandro C. Hermida & E. Michael Gertz & Eytan Ruppin, 2022. "Predicting cancer prognosis and drug response from the tumor microbiome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Takumi Saegusa & Tianzhou Ma & Gang Li & Ying Qing Chen & Mei-Ling Ting Lee, 2020. "Variable Selection in Threshold Regression Model with Applications to HIV Drug Adherence Data," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(3), pages 376-398, December.
    10. Zhixuan Fu & Shuangge Ma & Haiqun Lin & Chirag R. Parikh & Bingqing Zhou, 2017. "Penalized Variable Selection for Multi-center Competing Risks Data," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 9(2), pages 379-405, December.
    11. Wenhua Liang & Jianhua Yao & Ailan Chen & Qingquan Lv & Mark Zanin & Jun Liu & SookSan Wong & Yimin Li & Jiatao Lu & Hengrui Liang & Guoqiang Chen & Haiyan Guo & Jun Guo & Rong Zhou & Limin Ou & Niyun, 2020. "Early triage of critically ill COVID-19 patients using deep learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, December.
    12. Tatyana Deryugina & Garth Heutel & Nolan H. Miller & David Molitor & Julian Reif, 2019. "The Mortality and Medical Costs of Air Pollution: Evidence from Changes in Wind Direction," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(12), pages 4178-4219, December.
    13. Andreas Groll & Gerhard Tutz, 2017. "Variable selection in discrete survival models including heterogeneity," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 305-338, April.
    14. Kevin He & Yue Wang & Xiang Zhou & Han Xu & Can Huang, 2019. "An improved variable selection procedure for adaptive Lasso in high-dimensional survival analysis," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 569-585, July.
    15. Guilherme W F Barros & Marie Eriksson & Jenny Häggström, 2023. "Performance of modeling and balancing approach methods when using weights to estimate treatment effects in observational time-to-event settings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Das Ujjwal & Ebrahimi Nader, 2018. "A New Method For Covariate Selection In Cox Model," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 19(2), pages 297-314, June.
    17. Reid, Stephen & Tibshirani, Rob, 2014. "Regularization Paths for Conditional Logistic Regression: The clogitL1 Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 58(i12).
    18. Long, Xueying & Bui, Quang & Oktavian, Grady & Schmidt, Daniel F. & Bergmeir, Christoph & Godahewa, Rakshitha & Lee, Seong Per & Zhao, Kaifeng & Condylis, Paul, 2025. "Scalable probabilistic forecasting in retail with gradient boosted trees: A practitioner’s approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    19. Vincent Loubiere & Bernardo P. Almeida & Michaela Pagani & Alexander Stark, 2024. "Developmental and housekeeping transcriptional programs display distinct modes of enhancer-enhancer cooperativity in Drosophila," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Matthew F Dixon, 2017. "Sequence Classification of the Limit Order Book using Recurrent Neural Networks," Papers 1707.05642, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.